Image not available

743x527

1710959066468670.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16182631

Why do philosophists always claim metaphysics is more fundamental than physics when actually theoretical physics is basically metaphysics?

Metaphysics = questions about fundamental nature of reality
Theoretical physics = the same but more rigorous and with math

Theoretical physics just takes all the metaphysical questions (causality, (non)determinism, time, mind vs matter, information, etc), formulates them mathematically and explores their consequences. To me it seems philosophers have been cucked out of their former field.

Anonymous No. 16182633

>>16182631
Most philosophers have no education in physics beyond their terrible high school. Can't expect them to know much

Anonymous No. 16182640

>>16182631
>physics formulates causality
>>16182633
>philosophers have no education in physics
seems to me like it's the other way around

Anonymous No. 16182646

>>16182640
>seems to me
Gain more experience

Image not available

720x1480

1716118224285.jpg

Anonymous No. 16182648

>>16182640
>physics formulates causality
Yes

Anonymous No. 16182820

>>16182631
>Metaphysics = questions about fundamental nature of reality
>Theoretical physics = the same but more rigorous and with math
this is dumb. you don't know what the fuck theoretical physics and metaphysics are. I suggest you to read some more books before flaunting your retarded takes on the internet.

Anonymous No. 16182848

>>16182820
He's not wrong you know

Image not available

3840x2160

1300711-Wolfgang-....jpg

Anonymous No. 16182864

>>16182848

Anonymous No. 16183370

>>16182820
>dude what if the universe is made from tiny vibrating strings
Tell me how Ed Witten is different from an ancient Greek metaphysicist. Except that he knows enough math to prove that gravity and QFT can emerge from this idea.