🧵 Untitled Thread
Barkon at Sun, 19 May 2024 20:05:23 UTC No. 16183251
Causality is not to be confused with correlation, but it is to be understood not confused. I know cause an effect leads to infinite regress, but that's because it's consistent ever since the initial existence. Does it really have infinite regress, or does it lead to a first cause?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 20:08:12 UTC No. 16183256
>>16183251
Rationality alone is insufficient for some enquiries, however I think an infinite regress is a logical impossibility.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 20:11:29 UTC No. 16183263
Causality is incomplete. There are many things without a cause. The principle of sufficient reason has been deboonked.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 20:55:08 UTC No. 16183309
>Causality is not to be confused with correlation
Midwit take, Very popular with redditards and left for some reason. High iq take is, They're the same and it's left as an exercise to the reader
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 21:07:17 UTC No. 16183315