🧵 What Causes People to be This Retarded?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:10:16 UTC No. 16183384
>here's like 20 minutes of explanation for something you can count on your fucking fingers
do math fags really?
can we just all admit this is all fucking retarded??
Like this level of shizophrenically pretending math is some "construct" that we just invented is such fucking psuedo intellectual horse shit.
Its a sign of a dying society when people pretend like any of this shit is real, unironically i think the vide should be taken down from youtube as should all videos about
>>>"""""mathmatic proofs"""""
Math is math.
You dont need any of this hogwash
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:18:27 UTC No. 16183395
>>16183384
I see all of these words you've written, yet I don't really understand what you're trying to say
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:18:37 UTC No. 16183397
2+2=4 is not a mathematical but a political statement. In fact it is far right hate speech.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:20:29 UTC No. 16183401
>>16183395
Math past the point where you are actually doing math is bullshit.
If it doesn't exist in the real world then it doesn't exist.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:21:44 UTC No. 16183403
>>16183384
The cheese is old.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 22:25:59 UTC No. 16183409
>>16183401
>If it doesn't exist in the real world then it doesn't exist.
>t. pseud
>>16183384
Unfortunately some "intellectuals" (mostly atheists, of course) will assert that there's no proof that 2+2 actually and will always equal 4. They do this because they think it makes their arguments against God stronger when in reality it just makes them look like dishonest retards.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 23:25:44 UTC No. 16183502
>>16183403
Why?... why do obviously older women pretend to be 'young'?
Lady, be the grandmother you are!
Anonymous at Sun, 19 May 2024 23:55:32 UTC No. 16183549
>>16183401
>>16183384
You sound like a woke leftist technophile. You fags are still seething about Godels theorem 90 ears later. Math isn't all about muh practical applications, and pretty much all of modern math and physics relies on logic and set theory.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:06:59 UTC No. 16183566
>>16183384
Abstract math is a valid field of study, these pedants who peddle it should be shot in the chest. This is akin to your local fat bar trucker discussing "string theory."
>>16183397
True, all thought is hate speech.
>>16183401
Not the case. Theory often lays the foundation for later experimentation to make reality. Most of the things we take for granted today began as "impossible" silly theory. These youtube faggots begging for views notwithstanding.
>>16183409
I don't know what the letters you typed mean.
> IF
theists opinions have any credibility: I disagree
> IF
People arguing that 2+2 doesn't equal 4 for some obscure philosophical reason: I disagree
The symbol 2 only has the meaning we give it. But within that structure and agreement / communication / language whatever the fuck, 2 and 4 have the meaning their symbols communicate.
1 1 1 1
2 2
3 1
These are all symbols for the same thing, outside argument is just as pedantic and dumb as the cucks in the bait youtube videos.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:23:02 UTC No. 16183597
>>16183549
>Math isn't all about muh practical applications
You are cancer on the side of western civilization that is dragging us down and you must be purged
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:24:06 UTC No. 16183600
>>16183502
Bro she's only 28. That's not that old.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:50:16 UTC No. 16183637
>>16183384
That's nice but have you considered pretending to be smart instead?
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 00:51:27 UTC No. 16183640
>>16183600
Yeah she's still young she still has like 8% of her eggs left
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 01:08:13 UTC No. 16183658
>>16183384
I need 4 Tibees at 16, 18, 22 and 30
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 01:08:59 UTC No. 16183660
>>16183640
yeah it sucks we all age mate. i used to be like this when i was an edgy kid too but now i feel bad bc im old af myself too and cant even get boners
>>16183600
she looks 35 though
>>16183384
it's just a loser women who can only make a living telling this cringy pseud shit to literally sub 12 year old children on youutbe (or sub 100 IQ normies)
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 01:12:52 UTC No. 16183664
>>16183403
>>16183600
>>16183640
She and I should do a study on if big dicks are effective at causing pregnancy in milfs
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 01:17:08 UTC No. 16183671
>>16183397
Hitler believed 2+2=4, do you want to share the same beliefs as that man?
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 02:55:23 UTC No. 16183754
>>16183384
>5 years ago
That’s the year “2+2=5, or else you hate niggers and trannies” was an unironic twitter “discourse”. I guess she was trying to capitalize on that for views.
>20 minutes
Reasonable length for a slow-talking, feminine intro to these ideas.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 03:08:04 UTC No. 16183771
>>16183403
Woah even though she looks like a hag I am even more hard for her for some reason.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 03:09:24 UTC No. 16183774
>>16183754
>aussies were racist just only 5 years ago
when did it go so wrong with Australia?
They used to be some of the most based people ever, now they are probably the most soi.
How can we scientifically describe and model this phenomenon.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 03:13:51 UTC No. 16183780
>>16183384
I can prove that 2+2=4!
It involves dark matter.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 06:14:31 UTC No. 16184014
They're utterly pedantic for no reason.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:03:01 UTC No. 16184105
>>16183384
It looks more convoluted than it is; pic related is just a way to say "A+B is the number you arrive at by starting at A and counting B steps forward" using equations instead of a bunch of words.
Instead of unfolding the definition in one long chain the way she does, simulating how an unthinking computer would evaluate it, I think it's clearer to write it as a 2-step process, like this:
2+1 = 2+S(0) = S(2+0) = S(2) = 3
2+2 = 2+S(1) = S(2+1) = S(3) = 4
Reading this should give you some sense of how the equations in the pic encode the concept of "start at A and count B steps forward."
It's not really correct to say she spent 20 minutes proving that 2+2=4. That part only took her 2 minutes. Most of the video was spent explaining Peano's axioms for the natural numbers, most of which aren't needed for this trivial proof, along with talking about her channel, her sponsor, and a clip from VeggieTales.
Cult of Passion at Mon, 20 May 2024 08:31:57 UTC No. 16184144
>>16183384
>Like this level of shizophrenically pretending math is some "construct" that we just invented is such fucking psuedo intellectual horse shit.
You are not a Physics or Mathematics professor.
I can tell...some how, for some reason, by some means...
https://youtu.be/w4-Bm5NI2wU
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 11:34:05 UTC No. 16184315
>>16183384
Bertrand Russel and Alfred North Whitehead once proved 1+1=2 in two long volumes.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 11:43:56 UTC No. 16184326
>>16184315
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Awb
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 11:47:03 UTC No. 16184331
>>16183780
>2+2=4!
>2+2 = 4*3*2*1!
>4 = 24
>4 = [2]4
Theres an extra dark matter [2] that can't be observed with the naked eye but makes up 50% of the digits
Cult of Passion at Mon, 20 May 2024 12:51:50 UTC No. 16184420
>>16183384
https://youtu.be/LA4RRdfvXIo
Actually...she is right. This is perfect for a cup of tea or a home cooked meal.
(But Im laying in bed and her calm demeanor is just right.)
Im sold, subscribed. Thanks OP.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 18:23:26 UTC No. 16184816
>>16183600
Zoomers are aging like milk
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 19:25:40 UTC No. 16184931
>>16183771
Good child bearing hips.
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 20:50:57 UTC No. 16185059
>>16183384
i dont know man but i do know that i hate this cunt bitch. Just imagine how much wild sex she has on the daily and not even have to try meanwhile im turning 28 and will be a virgin still. I fucking hate women
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 00:30:10 UTC No. 16185361
>>16183384
Can I get some r34 of this bitch fucking the count from sesame street and the count counting his trusts and this bitch saying she loves math
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 16:15:02 UTC No. 16186341
>>16186336
Or a set proof for that matter. (I'm a mathlet who doesn't know anything about set theory or if set proof is something that even exists, and I'm not looking it up)
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 17:20:16 UTC No. 16186411
>>16186341
set i'd say, {a stone, b stone}union{c stone, d stone}={a stone, b stone, c stone, d stone}, and the cardinality of each set does correspond with "2+2=4"
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 17:45:50 UTC No. 16186449
>>16183384
>t. ADHD-ridden zoomer who can't sit still for 15 minutes
She's being pedantic but nothing she said is incorrect. This is just a thorough explanation of the meaning of numbers and arithmetic operations.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 17:50:51 UTC No. 16186457
>>16183401
>If it doesn't exist in the real world then it doesn't exist.
Your thoughts on the following statement?
>if it can be used to model and describe a physical, chemical, or biological process, it's real and therefore legitimate
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 19:16:32 UTC No. 16186597
>>16183600
australian sun
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 20:08:49 UTC No. 16186643
>>16183384
>let women in STEM
>this happens
Did you expect anything else? Women are hardwired to provoke men. Let them in power and they invert things. Mia Malkova Professor here turns a simple:
2 = 1+1
3 = 2+1
4 = 3+1
2+2 = 2 + 1 + 1 = (2 + 1) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 4
into a bottomless pit. Feminism implies BASIC truths are forbidden and complex ideologies are forced down your throat, because BASIC truths are male-friendly since the dawn of time and are what is required for a good life with a lot of expansion. All that lateral thinking will yield uncertainty at critical times. Better spend time with problem solving channels.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 23:02:32 UTC No. 16186934
>>16183384
This doesn't prove anything, because the solution is implied in the grammar of the equation. It's just a language game, which doesn't mean it can't be incredibly useful, but it's just language.
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 17:38:01 UTC No. 16188186
>>16183384
What's your point?
Of course it's obvious that 2+2=4, but more complex statements do require proof.
Going through a proof that 2+2=4 is just a neat exercise for grad students to learn the concept of mathematical proofs on something simple.
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:15:19 UTC No. 16188854
a) 1+1=2 (by definition of 2 as a symbol)
Similarly by defining 3 and 4 symbolically
b) 2+1=3
c) 3+1=4
Further
d) 2+1+1=4 (Substituting 3 in c using b)
e) 2+2=4 (Substituting 1+1 in a and assuming associative property of addition)
QED
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:17:50 UTC No. 16188858
>>16186643
>t. first year cs incel
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:25:09 UTC No. 16188862
>>16183384
You can say that 2 + 2 obviously equals 4 but to go into depth in the WHY is much more impressive
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:32:43 UTC No. 16188871
>>16185059
Start Zyzzmaxxing and stop crying.
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 06:09:51 UTC No. 16189031
>>16186643
>Mia Malkova Professor here turns a simple:
>2 = 1+1
>3 = 2+1
>4 = 3+1
>2+2 = 2 + 1 + 1 = (2 + 1) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 4
>into a bottomless pit.
You would think that, but by replacing x+1 with a unary operation S(x), she is laying the groundwork for a systematic study of natural numbers viewed as strings of symbols. This is an interesting point of view, and it is very useful for certain kinds of theorems (like Godel’s incompleteness theorem), though probably not useful for other kinds of theorems (like the prime number theorem).
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 06:21:13 UTC No. 16189045
>>16183384
Instead of telling you, I'll show you
>>>/x/37967859/
>>>/x/37970101
This remaining contents of that thread is why.
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 06:38:27 UTC No. 16189060
>>16183384
Agreed.
I've blocked that YouTube channel too.