🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 20 May 2024 23:59:30 UTC No. 16185322
holy shit... my eyes are watering, douch chills are flowing, and my brain is exploding over this. so much this.
this is everything.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 00:10:16 UTC No. 16185333
>>16185322
Blessed are the mathematicans for they will be Tricked by Stamp collectors
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 01:13:29 UTC No. 16185405
>>16185322
idgi
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 01:16:37 UTC No. 16185408
>>16185322
What even is that picture meant to convey?
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 02:14:44 UTC No. 16185460
>>16185408
if you depart from math, you lose all credibility... math is the platform on which all STEM stands, nay, existence itself stands. We are simpy living math.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 02:18:08 UTC No. 16185463
>>16185460
Yet all out funding is pity and our departments are merged and annexed because le industry maymays
This is why I decided to research AI (lol) as a mathematician. Not for industry nor money, but purely spite.
I will kill academia for what it did to me.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 02:40:03 UTC No. 16185487
>>16185408
trans women are real women
https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsou
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 03:53:11 UTC No. 16185548
>>16185463
go for your joy anon. I harbor no ill will.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:07:16 UTC No. 16185620
>>16185322
I cant believe Math got them to remove themselves from the equation.
Fucking based. Serf self sacrifice.
My hands are clean of blood.
:^)
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:10:00 UTC No. 16185626
>>16185620
>got them to remove themselves
Insufferability can be a super power.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:34:18 UTC No. 16185658
>>16185460
But modern math is an explosive incomplete logic whose origin value is a paradoxical self-contradiction, math is the only discipline in that picture whose "proof" you can't actually test for yourself and validated with your own empirical experience.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 05:48:13 UTC No. 16185682
>>16185658
Cite proof plx.
>1 post response
You know you cant turn that in...
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 06:32:00 UTC No. 16185711
>>16185682
>incomplete
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/
>logically explosive paradox
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/
tl;dr A logical explosion results from a paradoxical self contradiction which is when something is its own opposite and math is built around an origin number, 0, that is its own opposite number since 0=-0 based on the annihilator axiom of zero that establishes 0 as the value of valuelessness.
Chemistry, biology, and physics all have empirical experiments that validate the hypothesis while math is entirely axiomatic where the proof is based on virtual logic instead of hard experimentation.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:24:48 UTC No. 16185738
>>16185711
I literally reinvented Zero, I reinvented it before I reinvented 1. It started from the bottom now Im here.
>Chemistry, biology, and physics
PhDs, yes, (You)?
And yes...I *DID* divide by Zero, that is a thing...you dont tell me what reality is, you have a different God.
https://youtu.be/s_hbvRTGcUI
God of Logic. Vortex Math has no Zero, its "Dynamic Logic" (which is what I used to calculate that equation...) Who ever wrote those links...consider them decapitated.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:38:12 UTC No. 16185747
>>16185738
>I literally reinvented Zero
Yet you still use it as a valueless value, so you still haven't fixed the paradox.
>PhDs, yes, (You)?
Me? I know that those (Chemistry, biology, and physics) are actual empirical disciplines that can be tested with your own two hands while math is purely virtual logic rather than empirically testable.
The reality is that that video doesn't show a successful calculation, the device errors out on a race condition and has to be manually reset by the operator and the only thing I consider is that you are retarded because you are just picking words based on statistical probability since you aren't a real person with a real opinion, so you can't be decapitated, only turned off.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:39:19 UTC No. 16185751
>>16185711
>0=-0
Complex number? i?
Humans use a Cartesian line for that, I believe I used a spherical Geometry for that, so I didnt recognize it, and e is another thing done from an angle I am not viewing it from. Especially when shown in a moving graph;
>https://www.youtube.com/live/ZxYOE
Both hyper and sub dimensions are fully fleshed out.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:41:36 UTC No. 16185753
>>16185747
>Yet you still use it as a valueless value
False, never again say what I am.
I literally define Zero as having non-Nul value..............Zero in REALITY.
Not Pure Math....I need'nt need read the rest...this is too below my station, you ignore everything I say and think Im "Saying emotional drivel like everyone else."
Retarded, you posted normie tier while I am telling you world breaking news......WAKE UP DUMBASS.....YOURE ASLEEP.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:49:50 UTC No. 16185766
>>16185751
Yes it is also self contradictory when you set i=0=-0 since complex zero is still its own opposite number.
>Humans use a Cartesian line for that
No they don't, its the origin point.
>I believe I used a spherical Geometry
No you didn't, its just a point and it is paradoxical and hence logically explosive no matter the standard coordinate system you use.
>e
It is a constant that as nothing to do with 0 unless you apply the multiplicative annihilator function.
>dimensions
All dimensions share 0 as their origin point and are logical explosions via self-contradiction as a result.
>>16185753
>I literally define Zero as having non-Nul value..............Zero in REALITY.
Then what is 0+0 and 0*1 in the totally real system you have actually invented that doesn't treat 0 as a valueless value?
>you ignore
No, tardbot, I didn't ignore it, I explained why it was retarded.
Cult of Passion at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:52:29 UTC No. 16185769
>>16185766
YOURE CLEARLY A STUDENT.
WE ARE DONE.....GOOD GRIEF, CHILDREN IN THE LECTURE HALLS AN AWFUL LOT....
>Son...those links are not "I win." citations, theyre things you dont understand because when I break them you dont recognize it such or youre ising them improperly and dont know what youre argueimg about...but no, youre not "making sense", youre igniring and blurting back like a fucking retarded child......a college child.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 07:55:07 UTC No. 16185772
>>16185769
You haven't broken anything you can't present your redefined zero that isn't based on being a value with no value because you have done no such thing, you just say retarded things to draw attention.
Anonymous at Tue, 21 May 2024 21:11:51 UTC No. 16186757
>>16185747
don't argue with town's schizo