Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 07:30:54 UTC No. 16187454

>>16187453
Sir, this is a JPEG picture, 1280 pixels wide and 720 pixels tall, weighting 39.4KB

Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 07:35:57 UTC No. 16187457

>>16187454
You know what I mean asshole

Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 07:38:22 UTC No. 16187460

>>16187454
no it weighs 38KB

Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 07:47:15 UTC No. 16187467

>>16187460
no it actually weights:
183688 bits, or
22961 bytes, or
22961/125 (1.83688E2) kilo-bits, or
22961/1000 (2.2961E1) kilo-bytes, or
22961/128 (1.7938281125E2) kibi-bits, or
22961/1024 (2.224228515625E1) kibi-bytes

Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 08:21:25 UTC No. 16187502

>>16187467
Since when are bits a measure of weight?

Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 11:36:32 UTC No. 16187705

>>16187453
Both, obviously.