🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 23:11:07 UTC No. 16188673
How come scientists' predictions about global warming are always wrong?
Anonymous at Wed, 22 May 2024 23:53:46 UTC No. 16188712
>>16188673
they’re the ones causing climate change through climate engineering
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 00:00:49 UTC No. 16188720
>>16188673
they can't even forecast the weather tomorrow.
climate is way too complicated to predict anything really and there are way to many unknowns. if two giga volcanoes in indonesia erupt that's a little ice age for you. if the sun is more intense it gets hotter and we can't do shit.
having said no scientist makes the world will end predictions.
don't get them confused with sensationalist journalists
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 00:12:32 UTC No. 16188730
>>16188720
>>16188712
>>16188673
Retard takes
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 00:37:48 UTC No. 16188762
>>16188730
sup glowie
taking a break from making tornados in the middle of nowhere?
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 02:07:21 UTC No. 16188848
>>16188673
>>16188712
>>16188720
Based
>>16188730
Retard.
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 08:55:58 UTC No. 16189195
>>16188673
Scientific predictions about global warming were correct, though.
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 17:17:46 UTC No. 16189759
>>16189195
nope
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 18:59:05 UTC No. 16189887
>>16189759
>The opinions of one man = science
>A salon article proves this
K
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 19:16:02 UTC No. 16189937
>>16188712
True and real.
/thread
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 20:11:32 UTC No. 16190022
>>16188673
>shit is absolutely fucked, we need to take measures to unfuck it
>we took some measures to slightly unfuck it
>hey! shit is less fucked now, that means you lied before
Are you retarded?
Anonymous at Thu, 23 May 2024 20:42:53 UTC No. 16190076
>>16188673
>Hey we're ripping the fucking ozone layer and we're all going to die if you don't chill out with emissions
> People freak out and collectively reduce emissions
> The ozone layer goes back to normal
>4 decades later retards tell you the ozone layer is fine and infer that past warnings were all just a hoax
>Rince and repeat
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 07:05:33 UTC No. 16190743
>>16190076
>ozone layer in 1977: no data
>ozone layer in 1978: no data
>ozone layer in 1979: OMG THE OZONE LAYER IS DISAPPEARING!!! EVERYONE NEEDS TO BUY THIS PATENTED NEW REFRIGERANT!!!!
why was the ozone layer fine with everyone outside of america sticking to using freon?
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 07:31:17 UTC No. 16190762
>>16190743
>straight-up lying about the lack of data
Grim.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 09:57:35 UTC No. 16190887
>>16189195
>Winter warms more than summer.
>Correct
So climate change is a nothing burger.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 10:00:32 UTC No. 16190889
>>16189887
If that one man talking to congress in a position of authority of some large public institution it is not just 1 man. He represents the insane opinions of many men.
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 11:44:55 UTC No. 16190963
>>16188673
scientists have been right for 40 years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGV
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 12:21:57 UTC No. 16190988
Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 13:45:20 UTC No. 16191046
>>16188673
Also works for it being the Year of Linux on the Desktop.
Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:22:45 UTC No. 16192124
>>16191222
white hate epithets are racist and racism is banned on 4chan outside of >>>/b/ which is where you belong
Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 05:27:36 UTC No. 16192133
>>16192124
Take your meds
Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 21:14:52 UTC No. 16193113
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 07:41:46 UTC No. 16193715
>>16188673
Because global warming is fake and gay
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:08:42 UTC No. 16194726
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 23:43:04 UTC No. 16194984
>>16188673
>How come scientists' predictions about global warming are always wrong?
They're not wrong, but they can't report the worrisome, but nonetheless possible, extreme predictions. You see, unlike in the insurance industry, where "conservative" estimates mean assuming the worst case scenarios are possible, and so they charge insurance premiums accordingly, and in so keeping they accounting "conservative", in climate scientists are pressured to report "conservative" estimates, meaning moderate estimates, lest they be labelled "alarmists" or "socialists" and have their reputation dragged in the mud by denialist politicians if they report on the most concerning model predictions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A8
Relevant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8A8
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 08:11:06 UTC No. 16195446
>>16194984
go to >>>/pol/ if you want to discuss politics
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 09:38:12 UTC No. 16195520
>>16188673
because its pseudo science
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 14:25:11 UTC No. 16195851
>>16188673
That's why I cannot go outside nowadays. because they lied for sure.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 15:02:50 UTC No. 16195927
>>16195446
I cannot avoid answering the OP in such a way if the answer he seeks directly involves and depends on politics and not science.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 21:54:59 UTC No. 16196606
>>16195927
go to >>>/pol/ if you want to discuss politics
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 22:34:38 UTC No. 16196670
>>16196606
I don't want to DISCUSS politics, nor am I discussing politics. The OP asked a question about a science topic which must be answered through the prism of politics, that's all.
Maybe the OP should have gone go to /pol/ with this question, I'll agree to that, but there it is, I already answered it.
Done, moving on, unless you want to keep discussing politics, which I don't.
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 23:19:06 UTC No. 16196750
>>16188673
Because(human created)global warming isn't really that bad, if it exists at all.
Its all just to distract from the consequences of Peak Oil
Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 07:48:30 UTC No. 16197342
>>16196750
peak oil is a dumb fake news meme that goes back decades and it has always been a lie. there isn't a single oil field on the entire planet that has ever run dry, even the western pennsylvania oil field that started off the petroleum industry in the 1870s is still producing, it produces more now than it did 150 years ago.
Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 07:55:58 UTC No. 16197347
>>16197342
https://youtu.be/ikcK9CETChQ
Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 23:26:07 UTC No. 16198381
>>16194984
>They're not wrong,
yes they are, they've been predicting all sorts of stupid things based on the premise of global warming for decades and not one of their predictions have come true
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 07:06:46 UTC No. 16198800
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 08:05:29 UTC No. 16198840
>>16198381
>they've been predicting all sorts of stupid things based on the premise of global warming for decades and not one of their predictions have come true
Blatantly false.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 20:43:57 UTC No. 16199617
>>16198840
all fake
the weather hasn't changed even slightly since the 1980s
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 21:20:21 UTC No. 16199690
>>16198381
maybe you should stop reading headlines and actually start studying?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:58:07 UTC No. 16200308
>>16199690
>xkcd
sup reddit
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 11:59:44 UTC No. 16200645
>>16188673
How come Jesus never returned?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:11:10 UTC No. 16201410
>>16200645
You're ignorant about Christianity because you've never read The Bible
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:47:29 UTC No. 16202085
>>16190963
no they haven't. mockingbird media youtube propaganda proves nothing.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 08:17:09 UTC No. 16202191
>>16188673
Its really about securing funding.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 08:36:56 UTC No. 16202203
>>16188673
They're not, that's the issue.
The models hold.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 08:52:03 UTC No. 16202211
>>16188673
scientists are in large usually wrong all the time about everything.
Being a scientist is a new kind of thing anyways
og scientists would just work until they found something useful.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 08:52:59 UTC No. 16202212
>>16202085
>oh noes, actual data
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 13:35:28 UTC No. 16202488
Most scientists predictions about almost anything in the future are wrong. Futurologists have been consistently wrong since time immemorial
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 13:49:49 UTC No. 16202494
Solve the plastic crisis first before trying to figure out perpetual motion.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 15:10:12 UTC No. 16202584
>>16202494
Just stop using plastic, moron.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 21:04:20 UTC No. 16203000
I hope you like brown people.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/clim
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 21:09:55 UTC No. 16203005
>>16203000
>washingtonpost.com
>>>/pol/
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 07:06:28 UTC No. 16203746
>>16202942
>Informing people about potential risks as predicted by models
>fear
OK anon, if you say so.
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 08:12:46 UTC No. 16203801
>>16203746
>as predicted by models
models that have never been accurate in the past because they're intentionally geared to predict catastrophic results.
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 08:31:37 UTC No. 16203819
>>16203746
>>16203746
>>Informing people about potential risks as predicted by models
https://www.pbs.org/wnet/peril-and-
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 14:52:30 UTC No. 16204295
>>16203746
Doomers have no choice but to bring up the rapture. It is their whole shtick. This is the only thing the climate alarmist can even hang on to.
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 23:22:04 UTC No. 16205365
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:30:35 UTC No. 16206784
>>16188720
the scientists who predict the weather will continue to stay pretty much as it is currently don't get headlines because thats a boring prediction, makes no difference that those are the only scientists who have been correct time and time again for the past century or so.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:33:49 UTC No. 16206788
>>16188673
>How come scientists' predictions about global warming are always wrong?
Project Fear
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:14:23 UTC No. 16207411
>>16206784
Its worth noting that making correct prediction seems to win no merit, accolades or influence amongst the so-called scientific community
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:33:50 UTC No. 16207705
>>16206784
Blatantly false.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 19:21:10 UTC No. 16208237
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:59:05 UTC No. 16208601
>>16208237
Why can't climate deniers help but lie and manipulate?
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 04:34:04 UTC No. 16209164
>>16203819
>I come to 4chan to shill government propaganda
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 20:30:56 UTC No. 16210366
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 22:17:54 UTC No. 16210597
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:44:54 UTC No. 16211070
>>16210597
even the best global warming hysteric data from the """corrected""" temperature data still dips massively below the 95% certainty envelop, some of them go into the 5 sigma range for low temperatures as predicted by the models, you have to go back to the 20th century to find any data that was above the models' predicted values and thats even on your cherrypicked image
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:58:19 UTC No. 16211080
>>16188673
Not every body with a degree is a scientist. I'm pretty sure Al Gore could afford to have any degree imaginable, but he didn't make a single scientific descovery, neither did any of other proponents of that hoax.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:20:32 UTC No. 16211203
>>16211070
>frustrated rant bereft of sources and evidence
Cool.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:49:01 UTC No. 16212511
>>16211203
that graph you just posted debunks the one you previously posted. why one is the fake one? both? why are you posting graphs made from falsified data?
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:12:39 UTC No. 16212552
>>16212511
>that graph you just posted debunks the one you previously posted
Incorrect.
>why one
Proofread.
>posting graphs made from falsified data
Which dataset from the first graph contains falsified data, exactly? Could you prove it?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:37:28 UTC No. 16217217
>>16210597
How come all of the observed data sets dip more than 3 sigma below the model forecast? Is the model really that inaccurate? What sort of shit tier physics are they using in those models?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:00:18 UTC No. 16217600
>>16217217
>How come all of the observed data sets dip more than 3 sigma below the model forecast?
You do realise 3σ corresponds to a 99.7% envelope, right?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:34:37 UTC No. 16218684
>>16189195
you keep on spamming that list, but its just a bunch of lame replication crisis publications that everyone knows are fake
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:53:11 UTC No. 16219051
>>16218684
Holy cope
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:11:37 UTC No. 16220853
>>16219051
https://youtu.be/E3eMWLG7Rro
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:29:04 UTC No. 16221632
>>16220853
So you're unable to read and address the papers listed in the table? Okay.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:30:52 UTC No. 16221849
>>16221419
I'll address that:
1) Trees that are alive have captured past CO2 in the atmosphere, which is currently locked in their organic material.
2) Most of the carbon stored in tree material that rots in the open air will eventually be released back into the atmosphere as CO2 through the process of decomposition.
3) those are natural processes and they have been in balance, in general, all over the globe.
3) The CO2 released from fossil fuels when producing the energy that the modern Canada lifestyle requires comes from carbon that was locked in the Earth's crust for millions of years. It is not carbon that was already in the atmosphere. However, this is not about Canada, read on.
4) As you can see, in order to sequester the new CO2 released in 3, the processes in 1 and others which I did not mention (such as the oceanic absorption of CO2), have to not only maintained the CO2 balance we used to have, but they now have to also sequester that additional CO2.
For that reason, Canada has many trees indeed, but you cannot think of Canada only. "Canada" does not exist in the laws of physics, only in our minds, and the forest you mention, is therefore part of a global ecosystem that all together works to remain stable on a temporal human scale.
So the question is, is all the vegetation on Earth, is all the phytoplankton on Earth, is all the CO2 diffusion into the oceans, etc, managing to counter all the new CO2 that humanity is digging out of the crust and burning into the atmosphere?
It all indicates that no, as we can see CO2 rising significantly since the onset of the Industrial Revolution.
>ah, but the earth is greening
That might be so, but the greening is not surpassing or overcoming the new additional CO2, as far we can tell, because:
> we can see CO2 rising significantly since the onset of the Industrial Revolution
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:37:23 UTC No. 16221859
>>16188673
Because
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 21:59:22 UTC No. 16222958
🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 22:00:33 UTC No. 16222960
>>16222958
That's wrong
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 22:16:00 UTC No. 16222990
>>16221849
what about that whole volcanic eruptions deal?
dont get me wrong.
im on your side.
i think its important to push this issue especially on a global message becuase if climate change scientists didnt raise a fuss then we would be much worse off than they are now.
like scientists arent only bitching. they are aldo providing solutions to lower carbon emissions.
they just revealed a zero emissions concrete.
they design coal plants that are more environmentally friendly than before.
they are doing the best they can, and its pushing the clock back ever so slightly.
the reality is though that we will never not worry about our climate.
we are a global people, connected by massive trade and production quotas.
we have conquered low earth orbit with all the sateillites we have up there.
we now treat the globe as a farmer treats his land.
and i assure you there isnt an hour that goes by where he doesnt dote on it.
always worrying about nitrate levels, the weather, pests and disease etc.
the problem with simple farming though, is that the simple solution for a big problem is to just dump it in the back field and let it rust. our minds are at the level of awareness though where farming isnt so simple anymore.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:26:05 UTC No. 16224014
>>16188673
>global warming!
>two weeks!
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:25:07 UTC No. 16225579
>>16224014
They've been shilling that same lie since the 1980s and its never been true yet. You'd have to be hopelessly gullible and low IQ to still believe it
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:30:11 UTC No. 16225599
same reason predictions about technological advancements like space exploration are always wrong it's called simulation drift
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:09:59 UTC No. 16226341
>>16194984
nice, anon knows.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:36:02 UTC No. 16227089
https://youtu.be/QO8RKaqIR9U
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 04:18:54 UTC No. 16227933
>>16227089
>Who is Greta really?
"Her" real name is Gregory, Greg's mom kept him on puberty blockers and hormones from a very young age so he would look more feminine. /lgbt/ has already confirmed this
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:56:18 UTC No. 16228841
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 20:02:18 UTC No. 16228987
>>16228841
So you're unable to read and address the papers listed in the table?
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 05:44:26 UTC No. 16229852
>>16228987
>muh replication crisis papers
nobody believes any of that rot
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 08:14:10 UTC No. 16229960
>>16229852
>several publications confirm a decades-old prediction
>this is somehow a replication crisis
Incorrect. It's intriguing that you spew buzzwords without understanding them, and are afraid to address papers from the table.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:41:48 UTC No. 16230481
>>16190887
Explain how that conclusion follows?
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:33:39 UTC No. 16230555
>>16190887
70 IQ
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:53:18 UTC No. 16230597
>>16228841
good video
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:02:37 UTC No. 16230609
>>16228841
Savory explicitly believes in global warming and its catastrophic side effects LMFAO. Half the shit he advocates is meant to help manage it and restore ecosystems. Dumbass fucking retard doesn't even understand what he's posting.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:11:48 UTC No. 16230622
>>16188673
It's not that scientists can't really PREDICT climate, it's just that there's so much (((red tape))) that objective results and practical solutions get snuffed out by media mongering.
Like, it's true that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It's true that certain chemicals fuck with the environment.
What the scientists DON'T do is tell white people to not reproduce, while doing nothing to curb the R-Type reproduction of browns and darkies.
(((They))) say that we need to eat less meat and instead eat vegan shit and insect flour from facilities that pollute and kill fertile soil EVEN MORE than even the sleaziest cattle farms, instead of actually getting the US Navy to sink Chinese fishing tramps.
We're told to recycle, while corporations like Monsanto and DuPont can produce inefficient and horrific chemical waste that makes animals like frogs change sexes and grow extra limbs, or make refrigerants that are deliberately shittier than the tried and true R12.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:19:46 UTC No. 16230818
>>16230622
>We're told to recycle, while corporations like Monsanto and DuPont can produce inefficient and horrific chemical waste that makes animals like frogs change sexes and grow extra limbs, or make refrigerants that are deliberately shittier than the tried and true R12.
Honestly it's not impossible to sidestep this. Just become as self sufficient as possible and buy local shit. There are more than enough computers for everyone already and you can get food locally in most cases. The consoomption cult needs to die regardless.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:54:54 UTC No. 16230892
>>16228841
leftists have no response to this
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:56:39 UTC No. 16231045
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:31:04 UTC No. 16231931
>>16230622
cattle ranches don't kill soil at all, they enhance it substantially
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:34:42 UTC No. 16231938
>Scientists say "yo, watch out for this, it could be a problem based on what we know"
>A journalist says "the ice caps goin' melt in 10 years!!!"
...
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:08:19 UTC No. 16232046
>>16188673
Because scientists aren't infallible and/or they can have motives for lying or pushing an agenda.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:25:38 UTC No. 16233360
>>16231931
I bet you actually believe that they put cows out on land that looked like the right and it magically became like the left without them doing anything else.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:03:23 UTC No. 16233777
>>16233360
thats pretty much how it works. the research on the topic was published ages ago.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:30:09 UTC No. 16233818
>>ITT: people who haven't touched grass in 20+ years
Winter gets shorter every year, the grass is half dead and the past few years the sky has been on fire.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:43:30 UTC No. 16234097
>>16189759
This has been explained a long long time ago and you never bothered to check the source yourself and find that it was all wrong. Hanson’s predictions have been accurate. What you fail to realize is the roadway Hansen was talking about is not the roadway which exists today. It’s been rerouted
https://youtu.be/ugwqXKHLrGk?si=1h1
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:57:25 UTC No. 16234107
>>16188673
Climate change is academic fraud. Sorry that you had to hear that so late in the game.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:05:46 UTC No. 16234111
>>16221849
>2) Most of the carbon stored in tree material that rots in the open air will eventually be released back into the atmosphere as CO2 through the process of decomposition.
This assumption is incorrect! It is especially incorrect in Canada where biomass is preserved in the soil.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:07:14 UTC No. 16234112
>>16229960
Alex jones also got a lot of predictions right yet he isn't some kind of pinaccle of science you dumb midwit
Throwing shit and waiting for it to stick isn't science
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 07:10:53 UTC No. 16234114
>>16233360
That is how it works. Cows aerate the soil and trim the grass so you have productive new growth rather than a covering of dried brush that smothers everything.
Living grass maintains soil moisture. Dead brush dries out and leaves bare spots.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:18:15 UTC No. 16234227
>>16234112
>1) scientists' predictions about global warming are always wrong
>2) scientists' predictions about global warming are sometimes right; (You) are here
>3) scientists' predictions about global warming have been generally correct - (You) apologise for relying only on sensationalist tabloids
Making progress, nice.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 20:33:16 UTC No. 16235116
>>16234111
How can petroleum and coal even contain sequestered CO2 if all of the CO2 stored in those fuels is of organic origin, but organic matter all rots immediately upon dying?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 07:48:01 UTC No. 16235892
>>16235116
nobody can ever answer this question
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:15:06 UTC No. 16236933
>>16235892
After all the dead trees immediately rot they still leave behind some dark CO2.
Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:13:33 UTC No. 16238142
>>16233777
>the research on the topic was published ages ago.
It was, but it isn't politically correct for leftists to say that ranching improves the quality of the landscape because their only permissible solution to any problem is "government good, traditional private individuals bad"
So they ignore all the science and research on the topic in favor of their politically correct false ideologies. Then they use their political power to abuse ranchers who are actually improving nature.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:15:23 UTC No. 16238800
>>16238142
Eat the bugs goy!! Cows are bad even if they improve the landscape they live on.
I'd rather have a barren lifeless wasteland that a verdant grassland with cows on it. This is because of my concern for the environment of course and not because I'm part of a hate filled death cult.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:54:33 UTC No. 16239884
>no rain in the weather forecast for today
>currently raining
scientists can't even predict the weather accurately 24 hours in advance, there is no way they can predict the weather decades into the future
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:17:36 UTC No. 16239921
>>16188720
>they can't even forecast the weather tomorrow.
I can't predict what eating several Big Macs or smoking several packs of cigarettes continuously will do to your health on any given day.
I can predict what it will generally do to your health in the long term.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:01:14 UTC No. 16239962
>>16239921
What's your point?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:25:37 UTC No. 16239979
>we empirically proved that more carbon dioxide will raise the temperature of a glass tank slightly
>therefore there will be a runaway extinction event death apocalypse
>please fund us so that the world doesn't die!!!!
it's just bad science
here's the list of things that will happen before the temperature raising from co2 remotely matters. Acid rain will melt your eyes and smog will choke you half to death before co2 raises temperatures remotely. CO2 should be reduced because it's pollution and poisonous to humans, not because half-baked "science" turned into fearmongering for money. Scientists aren't saints, they want funding and they will lie and commit fraud to do it. Nobody will stop them because technically more co2 will increase temperature but the public are apparently uneducated unwashed morons so they don't need to know any details beyond that.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:39:25 UTC No. 16241929
>>16239979
>CO2 should be reduced because it's pollution and poisonous to humans.
wrong, if you were legitimately concerned about that you'd have a CO2 monitor in your house and you'd be running a big indoor plant grow to control CO2 levels, but you do none of that.
NASA sets the maximum safe level for atmospheric CO2 content on it's space station and spacecraft atmospheres at 5500ppm and they have astronauts doing difficult complex labor in those conditions, yet they're convinced that even 5500ppm won't negatively impact their astronauts ability to conduct their business effectively and safely. CO2 is not a pollutant. You would die of hypocapnia if there wasn't enough CO2 in the atmosphere, atmospheric CO2 is necessary for life same as oxygen is.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:04:18 UTC No. 16243057
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:06:03 UTC No. 16243060
>>16188673
How come denialniggers love making the most retarded looking cartoons? They're somehow less appealing than qanon schizo collages.
Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:31:01 UTC No. 16243091
>>16202942
Too fragile to handle bad news?
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:39:14 UTC No. 16243099
>>16202942
Isomorphic to delusional far left claims about racism. Kill yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:49:24 UTC No. 16243814
>>16241929
All of the people who complain about CO2 choose to live in urban areas that have the highest atmospheric CO2 levels of anywhere on the planet
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:17:47 UTC No. 16245257
>>16243814
They do a lot of irrational things
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 05:35:40 UTC No. 16246927
>>16239979
>it's just bad science
people who've never learned basic physics will still be able to believe it, thats the power of ignorance. if you don't know about concepts such as energy conservation or dynamic stability you can believe in a wider range of possibilities.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:48:45 UTC No. 16247330
>>16230818
This is my plan. But good luck convincing billions of arrogant retards in love with the rat race to return to subsistence agriculture.
Just make sure you have emf-shielded backups for your cybercottage tech.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:50:34 UTC No. 16247334
>>16234227
What is mainstream science other than a sensationalist tabloid?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:38:47 UTC No. 16248317
>>16188673
I simply don't see how 1.5c or even 5c-10c will affect anything, sure some places will become uninhabitable, some will become habitable. It's over such a long timescale that most people can migrate, farmers nowadays are pretty high tech too, and on average they will produce more food. In terms of water there will be more rain, sure it might have different patterns, but we can simply employ cloud seeding strategies to catch most of the rain that goes into the ocean.
There are also many ways to get heat out of the planet, imagine if instead of the great pacific garbage patch we threw away radiative coolers optimized for ocean temperatures and in a frequency that passes through water and water vapor. That's already the 1-2% area that doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.010 mentions, and that doesn't even include the land use or the other garbage patches in the oceans gyres.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 19:36:21 UTC No. 16249731
>>16248317
>sure it might have different patterns
The best farming is done with irrigation. Farmers that have to rely on rain have unpredictable oil moisture, the ones who use irrigation in arid regions can control their soil moisture for maximum effect.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 19:54:56 UTC No. 16249773
>>16197342
>there isn't a single oil field on the entire planet that has ever run dry
That's been debunked
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli
https://youtu.be/iHzWGnbI9nw?si=j8h
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 20:56:33 UTC No. 16249871
>>16188762
>he's a glowie because he called me a retard
ultimate snowflake
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:32:55 UTC No. 16250103
>>16230481
>>16230555
Cause in most places (and not your california centric ideology that is pushing this nonsense) Summer is mild and winter is harsh.
bodhi at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 00:42:06 UTC No. 16250113
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:30:37 UTC No. 16251098
>>16250103
California is the lowest IQ state in the nation
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 05:07:07 UTC No. 16252185
>>16249773
>washingtonpost.com
>>>/pol/
there isn't a single oil field on the entire planet that has ever run dry
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:59:57 UTC No. 16253190
>>16188673
this is proof that we are succeeding in stopping climate change and we must continue our efforts to further reduce its impact
Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:46:16 UTC No. 16255221
>>16249731
thats why west coast agriculture is best agriculture, because it doesn't rain there during the summer
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:17:01 UTC No. 16256837
>>16255221
Arid regions in general are excellent for agriculture when irrigation water can be brought it. Plenty of sun and total control over the moisture situation. Its almost as good as growing in the greenhouse minus the ability to control the atmospheric gas mix
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 20:06:11 UTC No. 16257149
>>16251098
because all the niggers
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:06:10 UTC No. 16257817
>>16257149
close, its actually mexicans
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 08:13:35 UTC No. 16257847
>>16188673
Name the scientists
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:56:03 UTC No. 16259077
>>16257847
James Hansen, Michael Mann, Bill Nye
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 02:50:45 UTC No. 16259181
>>16259077
Go back to /pol/
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:02:59 UTC No. 16260022
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:05:41 UTC No. 16260026
>>16259077
Not scientists, political activists and TV show people.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 02:10:37 UTC No. 16260534
>>16188673
>todays weather forecast: sunny & 78º
>currently raining & 66º
those idiots can't even predict the weather accurately 24 hours in advance, there is no possible way they can predict it years in advance
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:29:43 UTC No. 16261775
>>16260026
>it wasn't real science
all of the scientists echo the same disproved dogma that hansen and the gang have been shilling
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:34:16 UTC No. 16261787
>>16188673
They're atheist pathological liars and just want big government socialism/communism.
Evolution was also never proven, but has been proven impossible scientifically and mathematically, they still push that lie on kids (and a bunch of other filth on kids with "sex education"). There's a reason you don't send your kids to the government schools, it also indoctrinates them with this climate alarmist fear-mongering.
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 00:11:20 UTC No. 16262147
>>16188673
If the ozone layer has a hole...why don't we just patch it up?
That's what ma do when I get a hole in me shirt :(
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:29:40 UTC No. 16263337
>>16261787
When a scientific theory is disproved that means its wrong
Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:33:29 UTC No. 16263349
>>16188673
It's made up nonsense
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:15:50 UTC No. 16264537
>>16249773
>we stopped using this well because its no longer efficient compared to our latest technology
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 05:42:04 UTC No. 16265518
>>16264537
That doesn't mean the field went dry, no oil field has ever gone dry yet. Investing in new & better extraction tech means that the field still has a lot to offer.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 19:11:27 UTC No. 16266399
>>16265518
>>16264537
Cope harder.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:39:57 UTC No. 16266681
>>16266399
there isn't a single oil field on the entire planet that has ever run dry
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:46:09 UTC No. 16266695
Why hasn't the water level noticibly risen around landmarks like the Statue of Liberty?
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 22:36:09 UTC No. 16266778
>>16266695
Because the ocean has risen 16 inches in the last 2000 years. Why are you so obsessed with Kevin Costner?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:43:40 UTC No. 16267840
>>16266681
thats because petroleum is abiotic an inexhaustible
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:00:25 UTC No. 16269081
>>16260026
>TV show
propaganda
theres no such thing as innocent entertainment
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:05:02 UTC No. 16269175
>>16266681
>>16267840
Cope harder
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:31:21 UTC No. 16270002
>>16269175
you're the one who upset by the reality that no oil field have ever run dry. why does that bother you so much? why does humanity having ample resources available to it rustle your jimmies?
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 14:04:02 UTC No. 16270308
>>16270002
>reality
Lol. Cope harder
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 05:08:57 UTC No. 16271091
>>16188673
Climate scientists can't do math and don't understand physics, so they're incapable of analyzing the topic they're supposedly investigating. Climate science stopped being intellectually rigorous when it was branched off from atmospheric physics. about 30 or so years ago