Image not available

840x781

post-8127-1271196....jpg

๐Ÿงต STEMcel resentment

Anonymous No. 16189871

>In Science, Good Looks Don't Pay, Study Finds
https://www.livescience.com/59209-scientists-attractiveness-perceptions.html
A study found that good looking scientists were seen as LESS COMPETENT that their ugly and average looking counterparts.

Why is this? In every other field, good looks pay. This is obviously especially true in sports, cinema and politics (apparently Trudeau keeps getting elected thanks to women lol).
Even in law this is the case
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/good_looking_lawyers_make_more_money_researcher_says
As well as in banking
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12182271/Good-looking-bankers-earn-1M-careers-attractive-counterparts.html
And in executive positions
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619522000510

Research has shown that employers expect better looking workers to be more competent, but in STEM fields this is the opposite. Why?

Anonymous No. 16189875

>>16189871
It could be
>become aware of the halo effect
>Start compensating for it consciously
or maybe
>Just shill minorities and low IQ unattractive "scientists" for sociopolitical reasons
or some combination of the two

Anonymous No. 16190511

up