Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 15:53:09 UTC No. 16191213

>>16191186
Nigger we literally apply it in nuclear binding energy, on top of the fact that you can predict exactly how powerful a nuclear bomb is based on it.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:56 UTC No. 16191221

>>16191186
he established the relationship when he made gen. rel. His goal was to incorporate gravity into his previously established special relativity. He finds that not only mass will curve space, but in fact all forms of energy do, including kinetic or electric - it is energy that curves space, and rest mass is one type.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 16:08:43 UTC No. 16191234

>>16191186
Because c is constant but v is not

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 21:30:00 UTC No. 16191673

>>16191186
The Mass of protons is 99% not the proton itself but the energies of the photons it is exchanging between its quarks, the quarks mass is microscopic.
A proton has like 19 tons of force bound up inside itself.

Mass is just restistance to change in momentum, force carrier particles are packets of momentum. Trying to change the metric fuckton of the photons, the energy quarks are exchanging, takes alot of new photons being added, removed, or warped.

We use these shorthand measurements like mass at our scale for simplicity and utility, not accuracy or comprehension.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 03:03:18 UTC No. 16191997

>>16191186
Mass and energy aren't equivalent, they are interchangeable. Mass can be converted into energy, and energy can manifest as mass. Even an object at rest possesses an enormous amount of energy by virtue of its mass. The kinetic energy equation, on the other hand, describes the energy associated with the motion of an object, which depends on its mass and velocity. It does not account for the intrinsic energy content of the object's mass itself.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 07:25:49 UTC No. 16192253

>>16191186
Take some intro physics courses

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 12:11:17 UTC No. 16192500

>>16191186
They are not the same, they have the same units but still not the same.
They obviously behave extremely different, in fact theres several kinds of energy that behave differently so they are still different things.
Its like saying all animals are the same just because they are animals. Pretty dumb and midwit thing to say.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 13:10:50 UTC No. 16192559

>>16191186
OP has real thaumazein

>>16192253
No thaumazein

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 13:58:03 UTC No. 16192592

>>16191186
>Why do people say mass and energy are equivalent because of Einsteins equation
Because of Einstein equation. Just a theoretical idea. Unable to convert the binding forces in any type of "energy" they state it must be because muuh. Academic fraud as always.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 14:14:59 UTC No. 16192604

>>16191186
Mass does not exist except as congealed energy.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 14:26:52 UTC No. 16192613

>>16192604
>energy
Good goy, praying the mantra well, Now show the "energy".

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 14:46:18 UTC No. 16192637

>>16192613
Flip on a light switch. There it is.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 15:12:37 UTC No. 16192671

>>16192637
>Flip on a light switch. There it is.
That's not energy, please ignore me if you do not know that .

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 16:54:25 UTC No. 16192788

>>16192604
>as congealed energy.
Very scientific, wrap this up as theres nothing to wonder about, also arrest anyone disagreeing

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 07:44:11 UTC No. 16193720

>>16191186
Shouldn't photons have mass by this equation?