Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:34:08 UTC No. 16191594

>>16191586
explosions are based, thank you elon

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:35:34 UTC No. 16191597

>>16191594
>explosions are based, thank you elon

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:36:46 UTC No. 16191598

>>16191597
COPE

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:37:32 UTC No. 16191599

>>16191597
CHINKS MAD

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:38:20 UTC No. 16191600

>>16191597
REDDIT SEETHING

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:39:57 UTC No. 16191601

>>16191598
>>16191599
>>16191600
Now say it without crying

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:41:43 UTC No. 16191604

>>16191601
>spacex dominating every single other rocket launch organization in the world COMBINED
>for some reason /sci/ gets spammed with threads claiming spacex is failing
Keep seething chinaman

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:42:09 UTC No. 16191605

>>16191604
So you don't know?

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:43:38 UTC No. 16191606

>>16191605
It's because China is mad as hell and is manufacturing anti-SpaceX consensus on reddit, and is trying to on 4chan as well.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:44:26 UTC No. 16191608

>>16191606
Ok how you know?

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:46:00 UTC No. 16191610

>>16191608
>Ok how you know?
Nice ESL, chinkoid.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 20:46:19 UTC No. 16191612

>>16191610
Nah that's you.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 21:14:42 UTC No. 16191652

Looks like an issue with the turbopumps, figures.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 21:15:36 UTC No. 16191654

>>16191586

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 21:53:44 UTC No. 16191698

>>16191654
>engine has been in development for nearly a decade
>its still ripping itself apart
>failed successfully

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:06:31 UTC No. 16191703

>>16191698
>what is a test stand
>what is test-till-failure

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:07:20 UTC No. 16191704

>>16191703
>trust the plan!
>two more test articles!

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:08:37 UTC No. 16191707

>>16191704
Yes :)

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:43:24 UTC No. 16191754

>>16191707
based and but-of-course-pilled

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:44:12 UTC No. 16191756

>>16191754
Never gonna make it here with the wolves.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 22:57:53 UTC No. 16191774

>>16191586
Fucking jews, always sabotaging everything.

Anonymous at Fri, 24 May 2024 23:01:34 UTC No. 16191778

>>16191774
Care to extrapolate?

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 15:49:37 UTC No. 16192705

>>16191698
they're trying to figure out why their engine relights are failing during Super Heavy boostback and landing
so naturally you need to try to get it to fail

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 15:57:14 UTC No. 16192714

Well, you know what they say: Can't make an omelet without losing a few engines.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 16:08:23 UTC No. 16192732

>>16192714
>food analogy

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 16:53:36 UTC No. 16192787

>>16191586
Muh data collected. Landing on mars by 2024

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 18:10:14 UTC No. 16192885

>>16192787
That was the funny thing about IFT-1. If it was true that the booster was obsolete and that therefore it was fine that it blew up, it means spacex probably wasn't able to get much if any useful data from the flight.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 18:18:48 UTC No. 16192893

>>16191586
New thunderfoot vid about to drop

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 18:29:22 UTC No. 16192904

>>16191599
>Le attempts
Who care

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 19:20:20 UTC No. 16192965

>>16192904
But anon you don't understand, you just don't understand, adding another duodecillion satellites to support an niche internet service means that were going to be living on mars soon, or something.

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 20:45:48 UTC No. 16193070

>>16192904
>implying anything less than a stellar success rate
see >>16191600
faggot nigger

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 20:49:25 UTC No. 16193076

>>16193070
Huh, what you mean?

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 21:32:40 UTC No. 16193129

>>16193076
ESL post

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 21:40:30 UTC No. 16193143

>>16193129
So you don't know?

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 21:41:30 UTC No. 16193145

>>16191586
>>>/sci/sfg/

Anonymous at Sat, 25 May 2024 22:15:52 UTC No. 16193223

>>16193145
Hmm, nyo

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 09:13:21 UTC No. 16193802

>>16191586
It's over

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 09:59:37 UTC No. 16193863

>>16193223
nyaggers ruined this site

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 10:07:59 UTC No. 16193885

>>16193863
You mean saved it.