🧵 Is the sticky guy overrated?
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 17:55:54 UTC No. 16194462
Couple questions..
1. Is he the reason physics is stagnated?
2. His peers seem to think he is smarter than themselves by a larger margin. Is he actually smart on other stuff other than physics?
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 18:19:58 UTC No. 16194487
>>16194462
Here's a hint: His middle name is Mid.
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 19:08:05 UTC No. 16194566
He seems to be pretty smart but he's morally corrupt. String theory in general is a good idea but his focus on "complex geometry" is an epistemological crime. "Complex numbers" were a mistake and will never be a basis for geometry.
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 19:31:33 UTC No. 16194592
Perelman, Terrence Tao or Andrew Wiles is a better sticky than this guy. At least we can be sure they contributed positively to science and math. This guy was a literal who that were shilled by the greedy bastard eric weistein.
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 19:49:26 UTC No. 16194616
>>16194462
I dont know what string theory is. I saw a lecture on that by Leonard Susskind and i already forgot everything. Is it just epicycles? Yeah i figure in a space with so many dimensions you have room for more wacky stuff.
Kaluza-Klein was my first exposure to the use of higher dimensions to have more general theories, dont know what happened to that
Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 19:58:21 UTC No. 16194628
>>16194462
Normalfag here. Has this guy actually discovered anything?
Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 10:00:45 UTC No. 16195550
>>16194462
I may be overlooking, but isn't his head getting taller?