Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 20:28:28 UTC No. 16194668

Denmark is okay but its a bit myopic since its only a progressive matrix test.
OpenSourcePsychometrics is a test that has actually been studied and compared to the WAIS-III and tests memory, spatial reasoning, and verbal reasoning. The verbal section of the OSP was highly correlated with the WAIS's, with the averages being 107 and 111 respectively. The spatial and memory sections are likely also accurate but deflationary, since they are harder than the WAIS's. I took the OSP and got a 142, and I tested successfully into MENSA a year later. It's likely that it is accurate, but deflationary.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 20:34:11 UTC No. 16194676

You might want to look into the CAIT

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 01:15:06 UTC No. 16195086

so what was your score OP

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 05:07:48 UTC No. 16195296

>>16194668
>>16194676
Thanks
>>16195086
118 Norway and 123 Denmark. I'm satisfied with the results if they are true

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 14:07:45 UTC No. 16195819

>>16194618
They're relatively decent online tests if you're neurotypical with no significant variation between sub-categories of intelligence, as defined by the modern gold-standard tests. In which case you should take more comprehensive online tests (unless you can afford an in-person evaluation by a psychologist), e.g. tests from cognitivemetrics.co

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 16:35:25 UTC No. 16196081

>>16195819
Yeah I made a buddy of mine (who I thought was dumb) take the OSP FSIQ v3 and he shocked me by getting a perfect 150 on the memory subtest but a 107 and 109 on the verbal and spatial tests. I would always recommend a full spectrum test which examines subcategories.

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 18:05:33 UTC No. 16196200

>>16194618
I think brght is more accurate

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 19:09:39 UTC No. 16196298

>>16196200
Thanks for a recommendation