Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:16:43 UTC No. 16194744

>>16194734
all animals have a different framerate

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:17:03 UTC No. 16194745

>>16194734
Depends on your sex. Men process information at a higher "frame rate" than women. If a woman experienced the world as a man, she would notice that everything moved in a slightly slower motion (an exagerated example would be "bullet time "from the matrix movies).

There is a reason even sports like table tennis are segregated.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:21:38 UTC No. 16194753

>>16194734
299,792,458 fps

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:35:42 UTC No. 16194783

>>16194734
I don't know for sure but v-sync certainly is on.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:51:02 UTC No. 16194801

>>16194734
Depends on the bitrate and pixel density I guess. How good are your eyes and your brain?

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 21:55:47 UTC No. 16194809

>>16194734
One Planck time per Planck time

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 22:01:23 UTC No. 16194818

>>16194809
Not that it matters much, but the Planck units shouldn't be thought of as a "discretization" of the universe. The Planck length is simply the smallest possible diameter for any object not subject to quantum uncertainties. Similarly, the Planck time is not at all some sort of minimum time for physical state evolution. It's just the amount of time for a photon to travel one Planck length at the speed of light.

If a photon travels that Planck length from its current start point, it must have intermediary states even if they are unobservable or unpredictable.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 22:16:49 UTC No. 16194849

>>16194818
I was not aware that the plank units had any specific intended natural basis. I thought they were derived as products of various universal constants so as to be independent of any real world standards.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 22:21:25 UTC No. 16194861

>>16194849
The Planck length in particular is considered to be the maximum precision for measurements not subject to quantum uncertainties, i.e., the diameter of the smallest possible measurable object sans quantum uncertainties.

The Planck time also has a physical meaning in the sense that it is the length of time required for a photon traveling at the nominal speed of light to move one Planck length. Other than these two, I'm not sure if there are real physical meaning for the rest of the Planck units. They might have some physical meaning beyond these relations, but if they do I'm not aware of it.

Anonymous at Sun, 26 May 2024 22:28:45 UTC No. 16194872

>>16194734
Zero or one, depending on how you look at it, it's all one continuous frame with no gaps inbetween

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 17:44:31 UTC No. 16196171

>>16194872
nope, some greek guy said something about running a race and always being half way to the finish line so I guess you need to read a book for a change

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 18:01:22 UTC No. 16196188

>>16194734
Real life is continuous, not discreet. It's not divided up into frames. If you absolutely insist on thinking of it in terms of frames, then each frame is zero seconds long and there are infinitely many of them per second.

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 18:04:55 UTC No. 16196195

The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant that is exactly equal to 299,792,458 metres per second. According to the special theory of relativity, c is the upper limit for the speed at which conventional matter or energy can travel through space.

>>16194753
anon gets it!

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 18:05:56 UTC No. 16196201

>>16194753
>>16196195
OOPS! Anon you said FEET PER SECOND instead of METERS PER SECOND....cringe.

Anonymous at Mon, 27 May 2024 20:03:47 UTC No. 16196353

>>16194734
>section
huh? typo?
The "framerate" of reality is Planck time.

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 13:29:31 UTC No. 16197690

>>16194734
You can use meth to overclock your hardware. But beware, your hair will fall out because additional cooling is needed

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 13:42:43 UTC No. 16197696

It would depend on the firing rate of the photons, I'll let someone else calculate but however long it takes to get enough photons for one frame.

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 13:44:24 UTC No. 16197697

>>16196201
Maybe he likes feet

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 15:32:18 UTC No. 16197789

25fps

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 15:44:32 UTC No. 16197800

>>16194734
Per section? I don't know about that. But I read that humans can process up to 40 bit per second. So if you want to test your processing ability, a light flicker at you, from 1 flicker per second and slowly increase it until it just looks like it is shining continously. The amount of flickers per second you can process before it just looks like it is shining, that is your frame rate in life. Good luck.