Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 11:58:37 UTC No. 16197572

>>16197446
1. maybe, nobody knows
2. no
cool pic though

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 12:09:09 UTC No. 16197577

>>16197446
1, No. That's not how language works
2. No. That's not what universe means

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 13:05:53 UTC No. 16197647

>>16197446
>1. Is it possible that in universe everything is infinite and finite in the same time?
Yeah something can be infinite in an infinite scale but finite in a finite scale.
>2. Is universe just a small part of something much bigger?
depends on if you're a ZFC cuck or not

Anonymous at Tue, 28 May 2024 14:07:27 UTC No. 16197720

>>16197446
>Is it possible that in universe everything is infinite and finite in the same time?
Nah not unless "-finite" in "infinite" there means something different from "finite", since things can't simultaneously be true and false in the same way and the same sense.
And it's quite easy to prove that nothing can be infinite, check out https://www.youtube.com/shorts/W4_OXMCswKU which shows in less than 60 seconds that allowing for infinities leads to a mathematical contradiction.

And that's just one example of the many contradictions it leads to.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 05:21:05 UTC No. 16198698

>>16197446
This board sucks because of posts like this

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:27:14 UTC No. 16199473

>>16197446
yes.

Observe, that 0.0 is no more precise a statement than 0.000, or 0.00... . Indeed, no matter how many decimals, the nothingness has perfect precision. Indeed, technically we shouldn't even have a symbol 0, that is already more than nothing.

Now, observe the infinite. as we add more digits we are not gaining any precision. Were not approaching any limit adding more digits. Indeed, no matter how many digits we add, we'll never get a precise value for infinity.

So, alas.
No matter how many digits we add to nothing, its precision is perfect.
No matter how many digits we add to the infinite,
there is no precision at all, no restful respite at a defined position on the number line.

Nothingness and infiniteness comes before number. If we only have two components, nothingness and infinite how can we get something inbetween, the unity.

We find that by forming a quaternary with the infinite and nothing. A balance between these opposing forces, the ouroboros operator.
[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\}[/math]

the continuum, the proper notion of 'the empty set' the true basis of set theory derived from first principles.

by performing the ouroboros operator on two continuums, they fractally nest, bequeathing the unity.

[math]0 \circlearrowleft \infty \circlearrowleft 0 \circlearrowleft \infty = \{\{\}\} = 1[/math]

thus forming the the basis of the polynumber system, the true box math

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:28:52 UTC No. 16199475

>>16199473
deriving the basis of set theory, rooting the polynumber system with MMP. Creating a skeleton key for those imprisioned in the real number delusion to escape

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:48:29 UTC No. 16199501

>>16197446
Why do fags constantly ask about weird mental gymnastics without providing any reasoning the hypotehsis is based on ?
The observable universe is finite. There is nothing beyond the observable universe. Things crossing over the horizon are gone.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:22:21 UTC No. 16200360

>>16199501
>The observable universe is finite.
Yes if you artificially reduce the universe to only the stuff you want to count of course it is finite, but that isn't really adding anything to the discussion or saying anything about the nature of the universe only about your own limited capacity to interact with things.