Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 14:14:00 UTC No. 16199119
>>16199105
grifter like his brother
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 14:56:55 UTC No. 16199158
>>16199105
Is this the guy who talked to some university students and basically just let them insult him and call his people, Jews, just "spicy Whites"? If so lol.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 15:06:05 UTC No. 16199171
>>16199105
full of him self, but also a lunatic retard. kanye west without the charisma and with negative sex appeal
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 15:07:00 UTC No. 16199174
>>16199119
This.
Became a sellout when he started pandering to pseuds on JewTube about his autistic pet theory, and how the 'Corrupt' and 'Delusional' stringfags bogart all the attention, yet the only thing he has are some half-assed hand-wavey papers and a mutually masturbating fanbase.
Still a cool guy tho.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 17:42:03 UTC No. 16199348
>>16199105
Ah yes, mister I-found-a-theory-of-everything-but-
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 17:50:07 UTC No. 16199361
>>16199105
A jew
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 18:02:47 UTC No. 16199377
>>16199105
He's annoying but he's right about string theorists imo. I saw a video of him debating Michio Kaku and Kaku was completely insufferable.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 18:03:49 UTC No. 16199378
Brother better
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 18:06:26 UTC No. 16199382
>>16199377
Wait no I think it was Kaku versus Penrose and Sabine. Either way, point stands
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 18:29:40 UTC No. 16199412
>>16199105
Obviously intelligent, but highly overestimates his competence.
Capable of interesting ideas at times (I quite like the idea of an "Embedded Growth Obligation" as an example) but tends to spend so much time weaving social narratives that he loses the plot on the actual substance.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:18:41 UTC No. 16199461
>>16199105
I am so fucking pissed off and disappointed that he couldn't pull his own Terrence Howard on JRE.
Terrence Howard did what Eric Weinstein couldn't do.
Who would have fucking thunk it?
>>16199119
They do want a lot of credit and citations to be remembered. They are tremendously insecure. Unfortunate Gen X'ers.
>>16199412
>...but tends to spend so much time weaving social narratives that he loses the plot on the actual substance.
No. Wrong. His problem is that he conceals information. He works for Peter Thiel (or something), so he must have insider information that he cannot divulge. This makes him a terrible person to listen to because he is hedging his bets...against you.
I'm so diappointed in this guy, it's unblelievable.
Sam Harris really made the baid-aid pulling so much less painful. Thanks, Trump Derrangement Syndrome.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:19:42 UTC No. 16199465
>>16199461
>band-aid pulling**
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 19:48:06 UTC No. 16199499
>>16199105
absolute moron
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 20:15:32 UTC No. 16199558
>>16199461
You seem like a schizo who believes you can read the minds and intentions of others even without having any serious experience with them.
What kind of reasoning is this?
> He works for Peter Thiel (or something) so he must have insider information that he cannot divulge.
You can dislike and distrust everything the guy has ever said, but it still wouldn't justify the strange chain of causality you've linked in your head without yourself having some "insider information" about his motivations.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 21:36:54 UTC No. 16199733
>>16199558
>You seem like a schizo who believes you can read the minds and intentions of others even without having any serious experience with them.
Check out this NPC. I wonder what predictable text he will output next.
>What kind of reasoning is this?
It's the reasoning of knowing what intellectual property is. It's the reasoning of knowing what "industry secrets" means. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade
>You can dislike and distrust everything the guy has ever said, but it still wouldn't justify the strange chain of causality you've linked in your head without yourself having some "insider information" about his motivations.
You might as well use ChatGPT for your outputs. Just put my text into ChatGPT and ask it to respond.
Copy and paste.
Easy. You don't even need to think deeply about anything.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 21:39:37 UTC No. 16199739
>>16199105
my verdict is that he has a very punchable face and nothing of value to say.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 22:29:06 UTC No. 16199808
>>16199733
I don't think you've done much of any "deep thinking" based on the way you respond. You seem to basically just react to whatever your current emotional impulses are.
Understanding that people have some responsibility towards protection of IP of themselves and their employer is not the same thing as understanding them to be conspiring against you. Those are very different.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:06:22 UTC No. 16199857
>>16199808
>Understanding that people have some responsibility towards protection of IP of themselves and their employer is not the same thing as understanding them to be conspiring against you.
Lol, you fucking shizo. No one is conspiring against me. Lol.
>You seem to basically just react to whatever your current emotional impulses are.
Just because you are a psychopath doesn't mean that you are intelligent.
Stay mad at Terrence Howard. Shit ain't about me. Lol. Fucking idiot.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:10:14 UTC No. 16199867
>>16199857
You literally said:
> This makes him a terrible person to listen to because he is hedging his bets...against you.
Is there some other way you intended for that to be interpreted?
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:17:48 UTC No. 16199879
>>16199867
Just one question, yes or no is preferable.
Is this image misinformation?
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:19:50 UTC No. 16199882
>>16199879
I have no idea. I wouldn't be surprised if he hung around with Epstein types or did research in groups with Epstein funding. He seems like the kind of guy that would be in that orbit.
If you are saying there is proof that he was pals with Epstein I'd believe you.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:22:01 UTC No. 16199886
>>16199882
So this is a ChatGPT.
Nice.
You can't be a real person. Good game.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:44:47 UTC No. 16199927
>>16199886
I can't be a real person because I don't take your random screenshot at face value on a topic I don't know anything about? I have no fucking clue if the dude hung out with Epstein or took funding from him. It could be true or it could not be. It wouldn't surprise me if it's true, but it also wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't given the number of people online who fake things like this for attention/internet clout.
That's the thing with something being called "misinformation." If you're going to say it's misinformation you should know that it's not true. I don't know either way and don't think a random screenshot is who to make a decision either way.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:46:54 UTC No. 16199931
>>16199927
>a topic I don't know anything about
Start learning?
What am I supposed to tell you? Stay retarded?
Fucking p-zombies.
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:51:46 UTC No. 16199940
>>16199931
I'm not wasting any time reading into whether Eric Weinstein was pals with Epstein. There's literally nothing but schizo-babble to uncover by looking into this topic via chains of Twitter screenshots and shit-posting. If he was friends with Epstein, he's certainly not alone in that for influential "science personalities." If he wasn't then it's even less important because it just reveals the obvious fact that there are people willing to fabricate these things for internet clout/drama farming. Who gives a shit either way?
Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 23:53:48 UTC No. 16199942
>>16199940
>Who gives a shit either way?
This conversation began with you outputting:
>You seem like a schizo who believes you can read the minds and intentions of others even without having any serious experience with them.
Apparently, you care and do not care.
And that is fucking awesome.
Reply to this comment.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:26:29 UTC No. 16199996
>>16199942
> Reply to this comment.
Okay. I've replied. Anything else?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 00:33:43 UTC No. 16200007
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:30:24 UTC No. 16200058
>>16199105
Your typical Jewish supremacist concerned with keeping the tribe in power. His unification theory needs waaaaaaaaaaaay more work than he markets it as (but typical considering his early life). To me, it seems like he is going for a modern day Kaluza-Klein theory except there are so many points in his paper where he's "forgotten the proof", etc. The biggest flaw though is that the theory (if you can call it that at this point) is not quantum and its questionable whether the quantum version would even be renormalizable, etc. Also alot of his beefs he has with the system seem to originate from his selfish desire that he's not given enough money/cheap labor/atta boys from the institutions.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 01:58:23 UTC No. 16200102
>>16200058
Why do you write these posts?
When you commented on >>16199119 why did you write it that way?
How's the data collection going?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:24:54 UTC No. 16200889
>>16199105
HUGE narcissist.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:43:34 UTC No. 16200921
He btfo Neil deGrasse in a way I’ve never seen someone do before.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SAoWF
And he’s 100% right; safe science is stifling science.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:46:02 UTC No. 16200926
>>16200921
>neil isn't a great physicist
ok now let's see weinstein's publications
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:43:39 UTC No. 16201023
>>16200921
You can't see, chatbot.
I really like how all your posts are similarly themed.
You should inversely incorporate that into your training model.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:45:37 UTC No. 16201024
>>16199105
Not just a pretty face.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:57:32 UTC No. 16201368
>>16199105
Well, reading this thread, I`ll lean out by saying this, but I kind of like what he is talking about.
>>16199377
To be fair, when was a theoretical physicist NOT insufferable?
>>16199382
Penrose, every time of the day... Sabine is interesting, but the only video I could 100% agree with was her venting about the science community.
>>16199412
This is a fair assessment
>>16200921
Him ripping into NDGT was really good. Compliment him, then say what his problem is... People should learn that way to speak.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 03:24:03 UTC No. 16201902
>>16201368
Every single reply of yours was to a bot post
That's so cool.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 04:58:54 UTC No. 16202028
>>16199105
genius like his brother
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 05:06:25 UTC No. 16202041
>>16199105
Grifter piece of shit. Unsurprisingly just like all the others.
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 17:03:16 UTC No. 16202718
>>16199119
/thread