Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 20:45:10 UTC No. 16199619

>If "manlets" are not considered men, why they have the word man in its name?
>Why not give it a unique name, like it's done with children, women, trannies, niggers, etc.?

>Also, the word is just a social construct, correct? There's nothing physical to ALL manlets that completely differentiate them to ALL men.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 20:50:54 UTC No. 16199634

>>16199599
How do we know what Eris is like if our only 'photograph' of it is just a bunch of pixels?

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 20:56:58 UTC No. 16199650

>>16199599

Break up all the dwarf planets in an orbital zone and you’d get asteroids. Irregular objects without enough gravity to become spherical, but can orbit together without any one dominant body. Put all the dwarf planets together and you’d get a planet. One object with the gravity to become spherical that is the primary mass of its orbit without any other objects to match its’ size. But dwarf planets are in the mid range of these two states. They’re big enough to be spherical but they are not so big that they dominate the mass of their orbital zone.

Anonymous at Wed, 29 May 2024 21:04:52 UTC No. 16199666

>>16199599
>There's nothing physical to ALL dwarf planets that completely differentiate them to ALL planets.
something about clearing up their orbit or something about gravitational dominance along their orbital region or something something. It's out there online, you can find the difference in the definitions.