Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 04:11:16 UTC No. 16200209

>>16200205
Great, you have an idea, now go do actual theory.

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 04:18:32 UTC No. 16200214

>>16200205
Just curious, do you think we wouldn't have noticed if generating massive EM emissions altered gravity in the area local to those EM emissions? Do you think someone wouldn't have noticed that something like a Faraday cage would suddenly have diminished gravity inside of it?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 04:39:14 UTC No. 16200227

>>16200214
Bad retort. That's like going in the other direction and suggesting mass doesn't create gravity because "wouldn't we have noticed that hovering a tennis ball over your head doesn't make you levitate?"

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 04:41:36 UTC No. 16200229

>>16200214
That's the thing, they aren't massive, they're high frequency and extremely low amplitude, caused by quadrillions of electrons creating almost continuous small waves in the em field as they orbit atoms

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:27:48 UTC No. 16200270

electric universe theory is funny

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:35:52 UTC No. 16200278

>duuuuuuddeeee!!!
>*hits bong*
>*coughs*
>dude, i totally like have the whole universe figured out and stuff, maaaaaaaaannnnnn
why is this narcissistic grandiose delusion so incredibly popular on this board? about 20% of the threads here are from some messed up loser who is positive that they're the next great supergenius

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 05:48:21 UTC No. 16200293

>>16200278
>NOO STOP TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THINGS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:14:01 UTC No. 16200340

>>16200278
The irony of your post is that a large portion of "main stream theoretical physics" makes ideas received from psychedelic machine elves seem tame in comparison.

>"What? You don't believe that there are 83 dimensions? It's all here in the math, a large portion of which uses imaginary numbers. You must be baked!"

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:31:49 UTC No. 16200376

Your theory would need to explain this stuff:
https://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/equivalence-principle

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 06:51:20 UTC No. 16200397

>>16200227
As a species we generate gigawatts of electric power with very high EM emissions. If there were meaningful interactions between electromagnetic potential/EM and gravity it would be almost entirely unavoidable.

>>16200229
Can you explain what you mean? What is high frequency and low amplitude? Gravity? The EM interactions with gravity?

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 07:57:32 UTC No. 16200443

>>16200397
>Can you explain what you mean
Moving charges induce waves in the electromagnetic field, electrons orbit at around 2200km/h or about 610m/s, now if we assume that planck length is the divisible limit that gives us 610/10^-35=6.1E35 ripples in the electromagnetic field every second, since the release of energy from just moving through the EM field is small then the wave strength, or amplitude, is extremely small, now if you take the interference patterns of the motion of all the electrons in a celestial body you should get a preferred path through spacetime which objects withh charge will follow, and yes, electron orbitals themselves are affected and not symmetric at all times, but all the moving happens so fast it's virtually impossible for you to measure it with any degree of certainty

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 08:41:44 UTC No. 16200475

>>16200205
>What if gravity isn't the curvature of spacetime but an emergent effect of electromagnetic interactions at the quantum level?
Gravity is an electromagnetic waves potential with no transverse element. Longitudinal waves.

>This could mean dark matter isn't unseen mass but misunderstood electromagnetic phenomena.
Dark matter and Dark energy are a cop out. The effects that we call dark matter and dark energy come from the aether, aka the vacuum of space, which is full of electrical potential and is teeming with 10^108 joules per cc. There is ab essentially limitless source of energy to be derived from the vacuum. Fluctuation in the vacuum create electrical potential which sometimes manifests as virtual particles which only exist for a short time. The rest of the time they are unpaired and invisible negative and positive unbound things.

>If true, this theory would explain why dark matter eludes detection
Dark matter eludes detection because all of modern physics presupposes that the vacuum has no energy. Put the "aether" back into the equations and it works perfectly (because it's an accurate description of reality)

>and suggests we might manipulate gravity by altering electromagnetic fields, revolutionizing technology.
This is exactly what happens. Gravity has been proven to be a wave that can be manipulated. I'm not gonna tell you how though. You can find that out on your own. You're on the right track. You've also discovered the Grand unified field theory. Congrats. It's been known about for several decades though. They don't want you to know about it