🧵 Interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:14:13 UTC No. 16200735
Which one are you and why?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:30:11 UTC No. 16200762
hidden variable blackpilled chad reporting
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 13:35:52 UTC No. 16200772
>>16200735
Hidden variable (the hidden variable being quantum mysticism)
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:33:37 UTC No. 16200833
>>16200735
none because le quantum is just another theory that will eventually be thrown out. in fact you should throw it out right away and start to think about a real theory of everything and stop wasting your fucking time.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:36:32 UTC No. 16200834
>>16200833
So hidden variables. Got it.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 14:43:49 UTC No. 16200840
>>16200834
If anything then sub-layer reality that is everything based on logic deductions about nothingness. Because your physicalism bullshit is stupid as hell and you have blindly accepted this world that has been pulled over your eyes.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:29:22 UTC No. 16200896
>>16200735
There are no particles. There is a threshold, noise, and a wave. When the wave adds up with the noise to reach the threshold, the corresponding event occurs, which makes it seem there are interacting particles, but there is none.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:30:24 UTC No. 16200897
>>16200833
Oooh, I know, let's take the single best tested theory in the entire history of science and THROW IT OUT because anon doesn't like it! Brilliant!
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:31:24 UTC No. 16200902
>>16200896
explain the photoelectric effect then
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 15:51:25 UTC No. 16200933
>>16200902
Explain why a helicopter can sound pretty quiet to your ears, and be loud enough to rattle your windows.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 16:56:44 UTC No. 16201039
>>16200735
None solve the measurement problem.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:22:45 UTC No. 16201054
>>16200735
I feel like Copenhagen and ensemble should be swapped
What's a good book to read on the most common interpretations after a year long qm course?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:37:15 UTC No. 16201077
>>16200735
stfu and calculate
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 17:40:13 UTC No. 16201082
>>16200933
Different anon, but that's just resonance I think? Helicopters sound pretty loud to me when I am outside, given their usual altitude. Are you talking about you standing outside next to the window or inside?
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:04:05 UTC No. 16201120
>>16201082
I mean the relation between frequency and the photoelectric effect is given as if it was somehow a self evident evidence of light being oarticles, but there are such frequency relations with sound, with no particles.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:10:12 UTC No. 16201128
>>16200735
Reality is observation by consciousness, that consciousness is deterministic due to hidden variable
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 18:17:07 UTC No. 16201138
>>16201039
>LE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM!!!!!! LE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM
Doesn't exist. All measurements are discrete and entangle themselves with the experiment - the wave function never 'collapses' to a certainty. Everything evolves together under a universal wave function which is projected onto measured states for the sake of experiment but exists without 'measurement'.
This is the true (only) interpretation, unless one actually believes in the prospect of arbitrarily small uncertainty.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:36:25 UTC No. 16201240
>>16201138
>>16201128
Source
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 19:45:55 UTC No. 16201253
>>16201138
>Hmm could my math be wrong
>No, there must be infinite universes
Just call them "Dark Universes" to fit with the name theming.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:08:21 UTC No. 16201282
>>16201240
>>16201253
Fucking retards, didn't even read the post.
There are no 'multiverses' that branch off, because there is nothing to branch off from. Again, both the observer and experiment evolve as an entangled state.
'Measurement' = interaction
Go search up 'decoherence'.
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:13:41 UTC No. 16201290
>>16201282
botpost
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:17:07 UTC No. 16201295
>omg, my brain, it feels so big!!!
>its full of so much schizo kike jargon and fancy basedence polysyllables
>oh no
>i can't hold it in any longer
>i'm…
>i'm gonna…
>i'm gonna QUANTUUUUUUUUMMMMMM!!!!!!
Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 20:24:18 UTC No. 16201309
>>16201290
>>16201295
BTFO
https://youtu.be/GpnLMaWylp4
Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 10:53:17 UTC No. 16202323
>>16200735
>Which one are you and why?
The only thing I can be sure about is that there is my own perception. Any attempt at interpreting quantum physics and its mathematics is beyond anything ever knowable, and therefore useless, pointless, and nonsensical. The search for meaning in a meaningless phenomenon. It just is, that's it.