Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:06:36 UTC No. 16201395

>>16201382
Another
>what if ludicrus assumption
thread.
AND WHY WOULD SAID LIGHT BE SLOWER THAN IT SHOULD BE ? SLOWER THAN GRAVITY ? imbecile

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:07:29 UTC No. 16201396

>>16201395
There is ether slowing it down

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:08:25 UTC No. 16201402

what's if its this
what's if its that
blahblahblah
what if it actually comes out your ass????

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:09:45 UTC No. 16201406

>>16201396
oh fuck. KYS

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 21:47:36 UTC No. 16201489

>>16201406
Not an argument

Anonymous at Thu, 30 May 2024 22:40:54 UTC No. 16201577

>>16201395
maybe light is fast but lazy?

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 01:33:47 UTC No. 16201809

>>16201395
>SLOWER THAN GRAVITY ?
Read up on Flandern's speed of gravity paper

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 01:43:44 UTC No. 16201815

>>16201396
hahahahaha

gottem

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 02:14:01 UTC No. 16201839

>>16201395
Why must we assume light only has one speed?

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 02:39:08 UTC No. 16201864

>>16201395
>word salad about ludicrous assumptions
>makes assumption that light always moves at exactly the same speed regardless of external influence

Anonymous at Fri, 31 May 2024 10:46:22 UTC No. 16202310

>>16201382
>What if dark matter is just matter whose light hasn't reached us yet??
Interesting question, but why would the light of detectable matter reach us but not the light of dark matter?