Image not available

513x284

mwewezfxl027bys6k....gif

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16204036

If you picked three random Americans and shot one, what is the likelyhood you shot any bad people?

Assume about half of Americans support torture/enhanced interrogation and/or pedophiles and war criminals

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16204336

>>16204036
1 bad 37.5%
2 bad 37.75%
3 bad 12.5%
at least 1 bad 87.5%

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16204340

>>16204036
1 bad 37.5%
2 bad 37.5%
3 bad 12.5%
at least 1 bad 87.5%

Anonymous No. 16204347

>>16204036
Depends if you are in a blue state or a red state, if you are in a city or in the country side. In blue cities is practically 100%. In red country side 0%.

Anonymous No. 16204394

The fallacy committed by OP consists of assessing "goodness" by a single parameter. Just because someone opposes torture that doesn't make him good.

Anonymous No. 16204439

>>16204394
No good person would support torture.
[math]a\to b \neq b\to a[/math]

Anonymous No. 16204492

>>16204036
>Assume about half of Americans support torture/enhanced interrogation and/or pedophiles and war criminals
but i guess shooting random people is okay?

Anonymous No. 16204502

>>16204439
This isn't true either.