๐๏ธ ๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 12:12:57 UTC No. 16204036
If you picked three random Americans and shot one, what is the likelyhood you shot any bad people?
Assume about half of Americans support torture/enhanced interrogation and/or pedophiles and war criminals
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:12:21 UTC No. 16204336
>>16204036
1 bad 37.5%
2 bad 37.75%
3 bad 12.5%
at least 1 bad 87.5%
๐๏ธ Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:14:02 UTC No. 16204340
>>16204036
1 bad 37.5%
2 bad 37.5%
3 bad 12.5%
at least 1 bad 87.5%
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:16:52 UTC No. 16204347
>>16204036
Depends if you are in a blue state or a red state, if you are in a city or in the country side. In blue cities is practically 100%. In red country side 0%.
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:33:51 UTC No. 16204394
The fallacy committed by OP consists of assessing "goodness" by a single parameter. Just because someone opposes torture that doesn't make him good.
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 15:52:29 UTC No. 16204439
>>16204394
No good person would support torture.
[math]a\to b \neq b\to a[/math]
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:07:34 UTC No. 16204492
>>16204036
>Assume about half of Americans support torture/enhanced interrogation and/or pedophiles and war criminals
but i guess shooting random people is okay?
Anonymous at Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:09:05 UTC No. 16204502
>>16204439
This isn't true either.