🧵 Atomic orbitals
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 02:28:57 UTC No. 16205601
According to science, this is what atoms look like. We can't see these orbitals or observe them directly because they are technically "probability clouds" but they are predicted by quantum mechanics. This is science.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:01:50 UTC No. 16205635
consider an oscillator like a pendulum and I had to guess where it was and I knew it's initial condition but not the time and I can't look at it cause that's cheating
well then a pendulum actually looks like a probability cloud then
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:08:49 UTC No. 16205651
>>16205635
>well then a pendulum actually looks like a probability cloud then
but the pendulum is actually a wave with no definitive beginning or end, so its actually spread out along the path, no?
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:11:44 UTC No. 16205658
>>16205601
>According to science, this is what atoms look like.
Yeah, but what do they sound like?
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:12:01 UTC No. 16205659
>>16205651
ZOMG IT'S A WABE!!!
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:15:49 UTC No. 16205668
>>16205658
Exactly like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tu
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:18:29 UTC No. 16205675
>>16205601
>We can't see these orbitals or observe them directly
Says who?
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.10
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:45:33 UTC No. 16205714
>>16205675
Fuck me, it's like the black hole shit all over again
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:54:03 UTC No. 16206140
>>16205714
In what sense?
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:17:39 UTC No. 16206179
>>16205725
Nothing, because there would be no particles to interact with your taste buds
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:24:43 UTC No. 16206188
>>16205725
no need to enlarge them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSY
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:24:52 UTC No. 16206189
>>16205725
>>16205658
I hope these posts are satire based on the fact that an atom looking like anything doesn't really make sense.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 14:40:41 UTC No. 16206212
>>16205725
The flavor is in the neutrons. That's why 2 glasses of water can taste different, they are both H2O but one has different amount of neutrons
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:04:14 UTC No. 16206249
>>16206212
Water with more neutrons than usual is HDO, not H2O.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 21:05:34 UTC No. 16206733
>>16205601
Electricians call them "Fields", not that words explain shit or anything.
>>16205635
>But how does it "oscillate"
>>16205651
>wave of what?
>>16206189
>the shortened word for "atomize/Atomism" doesn't imply it's specific/particular
>an atom
I hope your post is the only satirical one so far.
>>16205714
>The only poster with a brain
>>16206140
>In the sense that we literally observed/used everything else other than "it" to prove "it" based on what it isn't/doesn't do
Oh, Dark matter too. Ah yes and basically every other "particle" you can put a name to other than maybe a proton. All have absolutely 0 empirical evidence. It is why they still call them "theories", anon.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:04:03 UTC No. 16206826
>>16205601
they're predicted by classical mechanics, they just move so fast and have so many outside forces acting on them they appear in diffused locations, your detectors cant sensor single location because they're too slow
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:07:25 UTC No. 16206831
>>16205601
there is only 1 (one) electron
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 22:42:21 UTC No. 16206892
>>16206733
And I hope you die you stupid fucking retard. You have so much autism your brain is falling out of your ears. Eat shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 2 Jun 2024 23:10:49 UTC No. 16206923
>>16206188
kek
Amazing.
Protons taste sour.
And electrons neutralize it.
So electrons must be sweet.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 00:00:45 UTC No. 16207002
>>16206892
>your brain is falling out of your ears
And the lack of yours could be mistaken for evidence for any of the theories I accurately described.
>Eat shit.
Keep feasting on famine.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:36:21 UTC No. 16207799
>>16205601
>this is what atoms look like.
false
>We can't see these orbitals or observe them directly
because your premise is false
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:38:59 UTC No. 16207805
>>16205601
>this is what
> atoms look like
>look
No. That is what mathematics predicts where we are most likely to detect an electron around the nucleus, not what they "look" like.