Image not available

960x720

GISP2-based-tempe....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16206818

How does the government justify altering historical temperature data in order to create the false appearance of global warming when the actual temperature data shows a cooling trend over the past 100 years?
Details in this 2 minute video
https://youtu.be/of6FElgcYms?t=5

Anonymous No. 16206829

money

Anonymous No. 16207104

These boomer conspiracy videos are always the most anti-climactic shit ever.
I'm on the edge of my seat here for two minutes waiting for grandpa over here to explain what the NOAA adjusted temperature scale is and he just, never does. You're just meant to automatically assume that it's le bad.

Image not available

1054x1131

Screenshot_202406....jpg

Anonymous No. 16207106

>>16206818
Weapons>>16206818
>How does the government justify altering historica
Violence

Anonymous No. 16207113

>>16206829
FPBP

Sage No. 16207142

>>16207104
Only good post ITT

Sage

Anonymous No. 16207237

>>16207106

You forgot to mention virtually all those deaths were at the hands of governments that enforced state atheism.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16207387

>>16206818
>How does the government justify altering historical
People in the "government" do it because of fraud. Same reasons/ways they alter historical inflation data, jobs reports, other facts and data, so that the government can claim some urgent situation exists so they can spend more tax money, restrict your movement or employment. Its about control, theft, profit, fraud. Been going on since the beginning.

Anonymous No. 16207457

>>16207104
/thread

Anonymous No. 16208120

>>16206818
>government
there's some 195 governments. Which one?

Anonymous No. 16208179

>>16207237
>atheism
the bolsheviks were over 80% jewish

Image not available

1920x1080

Duttons dysgenic ....jpg

Anonymous No. 16208380

>>16207106
depending on if you think abortion is murder, the CCP admits they topped 400,000,000 abortions. So you could argue that's half a billion murdered buy their own governments last century.

And yet people still want more government! I think it's dysgneics.

Anonymous No. 16209205

>>16208380
>the CCP admits they topped 400,000,000 abortions.
I bet they're regretting that now that jeets are swarming the planet

Image not available

259x194

IMG_0264.jpg

Anonymous No. 16209214

>>16206818
What government website can I look up this data that they are manipulating. You know the us government post all the data they gather even the methodology from their satistical calculations.

Or are you just making shit up because you’re a conspiracy theorist?

Image not available

1456x1425

rQen10DZpnbj.png

Anonymous No. 16210428

Image not available

800x800

1682051594888191.jpg

Anonymous No. 16211090

>>16210428

Anonymous No. 16212517

>>16206818
They wouldn't need to do that if global warming was real

Anonymous No. 16212527

>>16207104
Why does unseasonably inclimate weather require 97% consensus? Why doesn't E=mc^2 require consense, or the distance to the sun?
The science is a political entity pretending like it isn't.

Anonymous No. 16212537

>>16212527
>Why doesn't E=mc^2 require consense, or the distance to the sun?
You can find plenty of crackpots who reject special relativity and heliocentrism.

Anonymous No. 16212543

>>16212537
Ah, but where is the meta-analysis giving us 97% consensus in Newton's Laws? The science is jumping through hoops for weather indeterminacy with such studies. Is consensus science or isn't it?

Image not available

534x747

20240310_235351.jpg

Anonymous No. 16212560

>GISP 2 Ice core
>Data starts in 1855
>Graph says years before 2000

Why are you lying OP? why is there a constant shill campaign on this board of activists using fraudulent graphs and data to create heterodox climate narratives?

Are you getting paid to do this or do you do it for free?

Anonymous No. 16212563

>>16212560
Funny that you talk about who is getting paid, when grants directly pay for scientists to find connections to mild weather indeterminacy.

Anonymous No. 16212579

>>16212543
Well, there isn't much money in denying special relativity. Climate change however...

Anonymous No. 16214530

>>16212563
>No u!
Pathetic.

Anonymous No. 16217310

>>16212579
>ITS A CONSPIRACY!!!
https://www.healthcentral.com/condition/schizophrenia/paranoid-schizophrenia

Anonymous No. 16217314

How many climate change threads do we need?

Anonymous No. 16217331

>>16217310
Retard take

Anonymous No. 16217738

>10000 years
>Climate
Why why why why why why why
Is it like this

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16217800

>>16207104
/thread

Anonymous No. 16218320

>>16217314
I'm thinking 6 threads is sufficient. If there aren't 6 threads up at all times there's something wrong.

Image not available

701x451

RotCurve2.jpg

Anonymous No. 16218813

>>16212537
general relativity has been observationally disproved on several occasions

Anonymous No. 16220897

>>16218813
>general relativity
Its not a real scientific theory because even though it is regularly disproved, it still remains as an accept fact.
Scientific theories are disprovable by the discovery of contradictory evidence, GR is not.

Anonymous No. 16220937

>>16220897
>Scientific theories are disprovable by the discovery of contradictory evidence, GR is not.
Google Gravity Probe B. It's the most direct test of general relativity ever performed.

Anonymous No. 16222197

>>16220937
Pure pilpul, Leonard Schiff is a cousin of Adam Schiff and a descendant of Rothschild operative Jacob Schiff

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16223095

>>16222197
>GR cannot be proven by scientific evidence.
What about this scientific evidence that affirms GR?
>AAAAAAAAAAA JEW JEW JEW YOU'RE A JEW EVERYONE IS A JEW JEW JEW AAAAAAAA

Anonymous No. 16224134

>>16206818
Good video

Image not available

850x400

quote-it-doesn-t-....jpg

Anonymous No. 16225762

>>16220937
>i have this one data point that suggests my pet theory is correct, that means its OK for me to ignore all the data which proves that the theory is wrong
that fallacy is not science, that form of willful ignorance is just a common cope

Anonymous No. 16227283

>>16225762
>that form of willful ignorance is just a common cope
far too common

Image not available

640x512

1680573327236224.gif

Anonymous No. 16228677

Anonymous No. 16229710

>>16225762
Good quote, but his theory that people don't just ignore contradictory data has been disproved by the Einstein cultists

Anonymous No. 16230711

>>16206818
>How does the government justify altering historical temperature data in order to create the false appearance of global warming
Greedily and megalomaniacally

Anonymous No. 16231841

>>16229710
his naïve, idealistic view of how things work was in line with his naïve, idealistic views of politics, which is why he was a devout communist.

Anonymous No. 16232062

>>16206818
Government alter data all the time because normies keep licking their boots.
Just keep paying your carbon tax, mkay?

Anonymous No. 16232143

>>16206818
My g*d you are taking it out of context
Now delete the graph chud

Image not available

850x400

einstein says soy....jpg

Anonymous No. 16233787

>>16231841
>which is why he was a devout communist.
he was a communist because thats what his (((bosses))) told him to be. his fame and prestige was created by his fellow hebrews in the media rather than earned on merit, so he wasn't his own man.

Anonymous No. 16234973

>>16233787
If he had been able to create anything of genuine value and use in his decades long career in physics then he wouldn't have been beholden to the media for his claim to fame.
Edison, Tesla, Benz, Flemming and the Wright brothers all earned their fame and respect meritoriously because their work produced tangible benefit for humanity.

Anonymous No. 16235829

>>16209214
>I come to 4chan because I'm positive that any information that isn't from the government is wrong
why are you even here?

Anonymous No. 16237105

>>16235829
I'm here to get angry at anyone who posts information that contradicts government narratives