🧵 IQ filter thread
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 09:49:21 UTC No. 16207527
Post filters, test your mettle.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:02:57 UTC No. 16207538
>>16207527
Why is there a spacing break between the 3rd and 4th rows? Is that image altered from its original?
I'm not going to waste time with something suspicious like that.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:04:51 UTC No. 16207541
>>16207538
>filtered
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:08:14 UTC No. 16207544
>>16207527
The score on these has been increasing as people went from inventing cars and rockets to thinking they can be women and injecting fentanyl.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:19:26 UTC No. 16207555
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:25:40 UTC No. 16207560
>>16207527
was that the shittiest low-quality version you could find?
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:36:43 UTC No. 16207579
Boo-ker at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:45:30 UTC No. 16207591
>>16207579
Mouf.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:53:59 UTC No. 16207600
>>16207527
>>16207560
ᚷᚨᛁ
ᚾᛁᚷ
ᚷᛖ?
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:56:15 UTC No. 16207606
>>16207591
>Mouf
I guess I wasn't filtered after all
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 11:41:56 UTC No. 16207643
>>16207527
>Japanese kanji on /sci/
I don't even...
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:05:27 UTC No. 16207680
>>16207527
is it because of these tests why chinese people are reported to have higher iq?
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:11:28 UTC No. 16207688
書 aka f. Sorry I have traditional characters ime
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:33:43 UTC No. 16207704
>>16207550
17, but it's more of a math knowledge test
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:46:27 UTC No. 16207720
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:02:46 UTC No. 16207744
>>16207704
>>16207720
I stand by my 16. The second number is incremented by one. The first number is only a distraction.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:07:47 UTC No. 16207748
>>16207704
>>16207720
Why don't you niggers explain your reasoning? Is it too much effort to write that you are interpreting the question as the Pythagorean theorem?
>>16207550
You retard do you really think it's high IQ to leave out the squared symbols and make a first year middle school problem seem all mysterious and unconventional? Shove the triangles up your ass and write an algorithm for early diagnosis of disease or something useful.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:10:48 UTC No. 16207750
>>16207748
>Shove the triangles up your ass and write an algorithm for early diagnosis of disease
O anon… I am so, so sorry.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:18:33 UTC No. 16207769
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:23:02 UTC No. 16207775
>living at home vs living at work
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:39:26 UTC No. 16207806
>>16207748
>filtered
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:50:54 UTC No. 16207818
>>16207806
Why is it even goid to be able to solve this one? It's so little information that you must see patterns everywhere if you see it in this one.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 16:10:24 UTC No. 16207947
>>16207527
E
>Proof: It came to me in a dream.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:10:47 UTC No. 16208001
>>16207527
D? Im only guessing though desu i cant discern the rule
>>16207550
17 probably pythagoeran trips
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:22:12 UTC No. 16208011
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:23:55 UTC No. 16208014
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:25:37 UTC No. 16208018
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 17:30:13 UTC No. 16208030
>>16208011
Green triangle
>>16208014
D and 7
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:27:47 UTC No. 16208151
>>16207527
Those are literally just japanese characters.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:21:21 UTC No. 16208504
>>16208030
>D and 7
Nope
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 22:59:01 UTC No. 16208600
>>16208014
D, K, and 7. If there is anything but a 3 on the other side of D, the rule has been broken. If the K or 7 card has a D on the other side, the rule has been broken. It doesn't matter what's on the other side of the 3 card.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 23:05:07 UTC No. 16208615
>>16208030
I thought it was the blue triangle. The square is right out. The yellow circle is right out. That leaves the blue triangle with a unique color.
Anonymous at Mon, 3 Jun 2024 23:07:48 UTC No. 16208625
heres an IQ test: succeed at life
get a wife, make money, raise children. if you can't figure out how to do those three then you're low IQ.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 00:01:59 UTC No. 16208719
>>16207744
They always add to a prime number, and the result is the predecessor of that prime number.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 01:30:52 UTC No. 16208868
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 01:51:16 UTC No. 16208902
>>16207748
They will rage at you for this, but of course you're right. 3+4 is NOT 5. Putting a plus sign there is retarded, but it makes stupid people feel smart to play pointless games like that.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:00:54 UTC No. 16208926
>>16208625
>heres an IQ test: succeed at life
>get a wife, make money, raise children. if you can't figure out how to do those three then you're low IQ.
BASED!
But you're unlikely to see anyone on /sci/ do that.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:48:09 UTC No. 16209001
>>16208001
C
Since 1B1W|0 + 0|3W = 1B1W|3W = 1B|2W
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:53:53 UTC No. 16209008
i cant read chinese
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 03:12:59 UTC No. 16209034
>>16207527
Ok so here two are two important rules I noticed.
in the second row there is a cross and a vertical line meaning they act independently so the unkown should have a vertical line {a,b,d,e,f}
Also there are two slanted sticks in the second row for no reasons so they're duplicating. So it must be d (If you think it might be c the horizontal stick only comes from the cross so actually knowing it's not that alone lets us conclude d without any other information also which is another strategy).
moul matisha at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 03:24:12 UTC No. 16209039
bump
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 03:24:53 UTC No. 16209042
Silly guy anyone with a high IQ knows they are not gonna waste their time solving a useless picture with symbols. What fun is that?
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 03:47:11 UTC No. 16209079
>>16209042
It's just puzzles man. Like a sudoku, or a rando math problem
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 04:10:02 UTC No. 16209112
>>16209079
I bet it's a fake question with a fake answer in the sheet , but anybody licenced to administer the test is told that it's fake, to detect cheaters who would memorize the answers.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 04:24:57 UTC No. 16209133
>>16208615
The blue triangle is ruled out because of the blue square being ruled out in round 1.
1st round: Yellow Circle and Blue Square out
2nd round: Green Circle and Blue triangle out
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 04:25:51 UTC No. 16209136
While already on the subject, is Mensa Denmark legit?
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:09:50 UTC No. 16209284
>>16207527
c
>>16207550
19
>>16208001
c
>>16208011
green triangle
>>16208014
D,K,7
>>16208018
cannot be done
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 06:26:55 UTC No. 16209305
>>16207643
it's simplified chinese
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:36:08 UTC No. 16209415
>>16207527
is this an elaborate loss?
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:27:08 UTC No. 16209466
>>16207527
What's the answer, OP, and why?
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:45:45 UTC No. 16209485
>>16208625
normie cope
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 12:51:51 UTC No. 16209685
>>16207527
>ching chao chong boiled dog taste rice? quiet grass is sleeping
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:03:53 UTC No. 16209926
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:15:04 UTC No. 16209945
>>16209902
Since it's a fair coin in the first run it's just as likely that:
1) Bob and Jane land equal amounts of heads and tails before they land heads/tails 3 times in a row;
2) Bob and Jane don't land equal amounts of heads and tails before they land heads/tails 3 times in a row.
Since it's a fair coin in the second run it's just as likely that Bob lands the same amount of heads and tails as he did in the first run as it is likely that he doesn't.
So far the answer should be no. However: although it's a fair coin it is wrong to assume that for any amount of coin flips the total amount of heads and tails should be equal. It is to be expected that the percentage of heads and tails can change every coin flip and the 3-in-a-row phenomenon can happen within any amount of coin flips. Ultimately the answer should be yes.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:27:58 UTC No. 16209971
>>16209284
>19
17
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:30:40 UTC No. 16209975
>>16208018
graph theoretically provably impossible (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seve
each room is a vertex (including the outside, which is one vertex as well). Each door is an edge connecting two vertices. A room traversal always deletes two edges. By conclusion only the starting and ending room may have an odd number of doors such that these doors will be deleted at the start and finish.
Four rooms have an odd number of doors -> impossible
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 19:35:04 UTC No. 16210260
>>16210125
You niggers have been posting this for 8 years now and it's what convinced me that RPM (or IQ in general) questions beyond the 2 SD range become more subjective and bullshit.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 19:46:05 UTC No. 16210279
>>16209971
Sum the numbers and you get a prime number, to the right is the prime number that precedes it. The puzzle should have used the triplet 9+40=41, or 9+4=11 to avoid ambiguity.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:17:40 UTC No. 16210464
>>16208018
https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/
Only works if you go through a wall
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:30:24 UTC No. 16210494
>>16208625
Also being able to save/invest money.
Theres no point in being smart if you can’t get a good job and invest your income properly.
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:06:10 UTC No. 16210666
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:22:03 UTC No. 16210688
>>16209926
Yep. The only way to solve it is to break a wall or to get over it (they never said you cannot do that, but they gave a hint: hard, but possible)
Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:23:06 UTC No. 16210691
>>16210666
very elegant, beastie
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:06:35 UTC No. 16210743
F. It's just a quiz on Chinese counting words 四本书
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:15:38 UTC No. 16210752
My iq is 65 :o
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:26:54 UTC No. 16210779
>>16210743
>四本书
> that was 四
I wouldn't know!
What are the other two lines?
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:42:44 UTC No. 16210807
>>16210743
>>16210779
okay, I figured out myself 十口人 (ten-mouth-man, man of ten mouths (family of ten))
八个田 (eight individual field (eight fields))
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 06:56:32 UTC No. 16211153
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:57:13 UTC No. 16211314
>>16210807
>man of ten mouths
more like “ten mouths of people”. similar to “ten head of cattle” in engish
>>16207527
back at you OP
ᚷᚨᛁ
ᚠᚨᚷ
ᚷᛟ?
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:45:50 UTC No. 16211364
>>16208018
Simple.
>>16209284
>>16209926
>>16209975
>>16210464
>>16210666
Get on my level
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 11:59:54 UTC No. 16211376
>>16208018
>one line through all of the doors
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:04:20 UTC No. 16211381
>>16211376
That's not a line trough.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:12:49 UTC No. 16211386
>>16211381
It's one line through each door
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:25:27 UTC No. 16211395
>>16211386
Nobody said anything about one line through each door.
Barkon. at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:27:51 UTC No. 16211400
>>16211395
If someone gets farted on soon it is an ordinance I set to diminish on its own.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:43:31 UTC No. 16211430
>>16211395
Yes, it would be clever if really it asked for drawing a "line trough", but the grammar makes no sense then so we have to assume it's a typo.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:28:29 UTC No. 16211500
>>16211381
AI will shamelessly give you those answers. If you are not careful to put limits in what it can do it will cheat like a mofo.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:35:00 UTC No. 16211507
>>16211314
>more like “ten mouths of people”
I know only little chinese, but I think they have it like you have it in english: defined word is followed by defining word.
May our Taiwanese brothers correct me if I'm wrong, but I think they consider family one man.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:41:44 UTC No. 16211518
>>16211364
I hate how much it looks life a face.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 16:23:00 UTC No. 16211965
Haven't browsed /sci/ in a long time. I hope none of you are over the age of 25. Seriously pathetic stuff here. Really, nobody gives a shit about your IQ. You're a nobody. Get over yourself. Christ.
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:23:35 UTC No. 16212576
>>16211965
post skull shape
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:30:10 UTC No. 16212666
>>16211507
>I know only little chinese, but
You should learn!
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:53:51 UTC No. 16212697
>>16211507
>defined word is followed by defining word
I wanted to put it the other way around
Like crystal castles is about castles, which are only made of crystals, not about crystal from the castle, which would be castle crystal.
>>16212666
Am I right now? Also your digits made me recall that I woke up thinking about how satan being enemy of the peole is a metaphor about whites being the people and darkies being the beast..
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:03:01 UTC No. 16212704
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:29:35 UTC No. 16213164
>>16208625
Based. Procreating is the ultimate IQ test.
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:06:41 UTC No. 16218144
>>16208001
I hate shit like that, this one's easy (Its C because its simple addition/subtraction), and other possible patterns that I can currently think of exist as possible solutions.
But IQ is about pattern recognicion
So if some autist went.
>well there are 4 white squares and 4 black squares in the first line
>there are 4 white squares and only 2 black squares in the second line
>the number of white squares remains the same, the number of black squares gets halfed
>so in the 3rd line there must still be 4 white squares and only 1 black square, if an empty field without any squares exist, thats the correct solution.
Its a shit example because its a super easy pattern and fully ignores what the being left or right of the line means,
But I hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
That to get high IQ points on the test, you not only need to recognize patterns like an autist, you need to recognize the EXACT SAME PATTERN that the moron who created the test came up with when there are sometimes multiple possible patterns, and sometimes multiple of the offered solutions fulfill one or the other pattern that the brainlet test-creator didn't even think off and included by accident.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:18:28 UTC No. 16218662
>>16207527
See >>16212863
Still no one has a solution. The great filter of /sci/.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:51:54 UTC No. 16219118
>>16218144
that’s a general problem with multiple choice tests, and it stop being a problem as soon as there is an examiner around to judge the answers
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:04:13 UTC No. 16219128
>>16209902
yeah. in the first situation it’s symmetric enough between Bob and Jane that it’s just 50% overall. In the second situation, well, Tyrone is still 50%, but for Bob there is a bias towards more Tails
>inb4 calculate it
No.
VeganEdge.org at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:11:29 UTC No. 16219135
>>16207550
23, and the first two statements are false.
>>16208014
first, second, fourth
>>16208018
A line thick enough to cover the whole picture will work>>16208011
Green triangle
>>16209902
no
>>16211430
It says all the doors not each door esl
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:27:09 UTC No. 16220160
>>16209926
you missed a door dumbass
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:03:26 UTC No. 16220204
>>16211395
If you have one line through each door, then it necessarily follows that for all doors there is one line running through them.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:11:44 UTC No. 16220215
>>16207527
10 mouth person
8 ? rice field
4 book ?
under ground big
small hand ?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:47:47 UTC No. 16220306
>>16219135
>It says all the doors not each door esl
Saying "all the doors" instead of "each door" in no way implies that it must be a continuous line.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:25:18 UTC No. 16220368
>>16207527
>shi kou ren
>ba ge tian
>si ben ?
>xia shang da
>xiao shou? shu
obviously the answer is 书
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:29:01 UTC No. 16220379
>>16220215
>>16210807
tian 田 means day in this context, 10 people, 8 days, 4 books, it's just classifiers
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:31:22 UTC No. 16220387
>>16220379
idk chinese just japanese
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 05:54:46 UTC No. 16221394
>>16220379
>tian 田 means day in this context
?? are you thinking of tian 天
>>16207527
ironically, the puzzle is wrong, it should be
> 八块田
though that kinda ruins the joke
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 16:18:16 UTC No. 16222186
>>16207527
What is the correct answer?
Can't choose between c and d.