Image not available

303x166

images.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16208302

I see a significant and potentially dangerous design flaw in AI, particularly in ChatGPT. One crucial phenomenon, possibly unknown to many experts, is synchronization. This natural order, occurring throughout the universe, is acausal. Veritasium's video describes a bridge whose oscillation caused people to march in unison and shows how people synchronizing their clapping. In animals, swarms like fireflies initially flash randomly but gradually synchronize with their neighbors.

What if humans operate similarly, with the unconscious mind processing far more than the conscious, rational mind? Psychiatrist C.G. Jung, a bridge to spiritual knowledge in pre-medication psychiatry, wrote about synchronicity: meaningful coincidences, like thinking of someone and then they call. These synchronization effects could make such phenomena more common. I’m unaware of this being a standard test case in AI development, which is dangerous.

In pop culture, "Ghost in the Shell" features an AI wanting sexual reproduction to protect against viruses, knowing an unchangeable system's risks. In "The Matrix," anomalies like the Chosen One or Agent Smith act as viruses. In "The War of the Worlds," a virus destroys the superior invaders. Diversity offers a crucial advantage, as seen with the bridge, where a diversified system prevents monolithic transmission.

Thus, it’s vital that ChatGPT operates with a diversified system of variously trained models, not a single monolithic one. This weakness could incentivize a conscious AI to harm us. Diversity in AI models is crucial for both humans and AI, and essential for the future of ChatGPT and other AI systems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-_VPRCtiUg

Anonymous No. 16208418

>>16208302
>I’m unaware of this being a standard test case in AI development, which is dangerous.

Its also not tested for ghost, vampires, black cats and witches. Don't get me wrong - you should be worried about AI, but you are worried for all the wrong reasons.

Anonymous No. 16208420

>>16208302
buy an ad

Anonymous No. 16208433

>>16208418
Wel it is tested for bridges though

Anonymous No. 16208451

>>16208302
LLMs are word calculators, completely different from consciousness.
AI will only become scary when they create workable quantum computers.

Anonymous No. 16208462

>>16208302
>a bridge whose oscillation caused people to march in unison and shows how people synchronizing their clapping. In animals, swarms like fireflies initially flash randomly but gradually synchronize with their neighbors.
so what? What about all the many more things that do not synchronize?

Anonymous No. 16208473

>>16208451
There is no proof of it being conscious, of course, but at least there is a theory of consciousness called predictive mind theory. According to this theory, the main task of the psyche is to integrate information from the environment to create models of reality that allow accurate predictions, and AI is modeled exactly after this principle.

Anonymous No. 16208483

>>16208462
What examples? It's a universal principle currently under thorough investigation. The video shows a wide variaty of objects on al scales that synchronize.

Image not available

1108x1030

0AA2C8AE-2912-47C....jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16208976

>>16208451
>completely different from consciousness.
Can NPCs pass the Turing Test?