Image not available

612x315

gettyimages-11878....jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16208735

Is physics finally returning to the idea of one primordial substance?

Anonymous No. 16208739

>>16208735
ligma

Anonymous No. 16208758

>>16208735
Modern Standard physics models explain the phenomenon ancients observe
Ancient physics models do not explain phenomenon modern scientists observe

Anonymous No. 16208842

>>16208735
Isn't that just called "matter?"

Anonymous No. 16208849

>>16208842
He's talking about aether

Anonymous No. 16208855

>>16208739
>ligma
I thought it was sugma!

Anonymous No. 16209934

>>16208735
we know that elementary particles have different properties, so no

Anonymous No. 16210102

>>16208735
In physics there are many conserved quantities, that cant be turned into something else. Like linear momentum, electric charge and weirder things like Baryon number. You can think of any of these as primordial substances, but not any of them would originate the others

Anonymous No. 16210504

>>16208735
You are mistaking these philsophers if you think Monad is a substance