Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:52:56 UTC No. 16210725

10
You see, the number didn't actually get bigger, the space between the numbers just expanded

Anonymous at Tue, 4 Jun 2024 23:55:21 UTC No. 16210730

>>16210725
or maybe you just counted to 10 in binary

🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:29:11 UTC No. 16210782

>>1621073
>counting in binary
We can test this hypothesis experimentally
11

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:32:07 UTC No. 16210787

>>16210730
>counting in binary
We can test this hypothesis experimentally
11

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 02:28:41 UTC No. 16210928

>>16210787
Jackie Chan

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 02:30:03 UTC No. 16210930

2

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 02:30:17 UTC No. 16210931

>>16210928
Shit

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 02:40:48 UTC No. 16210939

>>16210931
>mfw i already secured a five-year government grant by promising commercial and military applications of binary theory technology
oh fuck oh fuck what do we do binarybros...
the data is showing that our research is worthless...

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 14:16:25 UTC No. 16211580

>>16210722
2
3
4
5
6
Ϫ
7
8
9
10

of course