Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 19:47:38 UTC No. 16212239

>>16212123
Indeed, it seems likely that the fundemental theorem of vector calculus is flawed from such angle

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 20:38:53 UTC No. 16212347

>>16212239
no, you fool. it works. but there are better ways to explain the universe.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:05:50 UTC No. 16212417

>>16212347
so.... its flawed?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:07:23 UTC No. 16212422

So the 4chan contrarianism disease has gotten to the point that incoherent niggerbabble is deemed genius.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:22:38 UTC No. 16212449

>>16212123
I'm typing up a joke response to his paper, formalizing his algebra and discussing the implications of his statements about electromagnetism. It's fun and I'm going to keep posting it because I want people to read it. I even uploaded it to some random fuck-ass pdf site.

https://1x1equal2response.tiiny.site/

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:24:00 UTC No. 16212452

>>16212123
>there are no straight lines in nature
How straight do they need to be?

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:34:41 UTC No. 16212490

>>16212417
is Newton flawed compared to Einstein? No, flawed is not the word.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:36:24 UTC No. 16212494

>>16212452
>How straight do they need to be?
atomically.

Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:38:16 UTC No. 16212496

>>16212422
He's quickly passing from the "bemused irony" stage to the "based maverick" designation. It remains to be seen if the sóyguzzling reddit contingent can form an alliance with the schi/x/ophrenics and he reaches the ultimate Terry Davis /ourguy/ status.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 03:16:24 UTC No. 16212976

>>16212449
Don't be scared if you start to believe your own interpretations.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:15:11 UTC No. 16213214

>>16212494
any mineral lattice segment without lattice defects has many straight lines.
It's not rare, it's abundant, all around you, and inside of you. It's in your teeth, and in your bones.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:19:16 UTC No. 16213218

>>16213214
but if you want to get REALLY technical, because THEORETICALLY space-time is slightly curved, down to the microscopic level, you could argue indeed that THEORETICALLY, there are no straight lines in the universe, not even light rays.
However, crystals lattices are NOT theoretical, we can observed them with x-ray crystallography.

So you decide there. Frankly, this is philosophy talk because it's untestable, hence THEORETICAL.

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:30:11 UTC No. 16213231

>>16212449
keep it up man, love reading your findings

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:30:55 UTC No. 16213232

>>16212123
define straight line
geodesic going trough curved space would appear straight for someone moving trough that space

Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 16:15:48 UTC No. 16216836

>>16213214
those lines are imaginary, they do not exist as a physical thing.