Image not available

2025x2018

Digital_rectal_ex....jpg

πŸ—‘οΈ 🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16212260

Since the male G-spot is inside the rectum does that mean that nature intended for men to have gay sex?

Anonymous No. 16212267

>>16212260
real life traps/femboys aren't hot

Image not available

929x472

poop.png

Anonymous No. 16212270

Anonymous No. 16212280

Can artificial uterus implant in trans woman?

Anonymous No. 16212294

>>16212260
No, it means your girlfriend/wife should finger your asshole while sucking you off.

Anonymous No. 16212352

>>16212280
Men have mammaries that can lactate given the correct stimulation.

Anonymous No. 16212409

If the frenulum is inside the rectum, you're already having gay sex.

Anonymous No. 16212531

No. This is the problem with both young-creationist idiots and normal people: they make inferences about the "intent" of natural selection or god based on a property of a human body. It is a complete non-sequitur. There is no logical connection. If you you believe that all of evolution is about natural selection then you are flat out wrong, and you should do some proper reading of evolutionary biology, instead of reading from pop-sci sources. All evolutionary biologists accept that there are stochastic processes involved in evolution, including genetic drift.

Anonymous No. 16212690

No. It’s just convenient/inconvenient.

Nature/evolution(causality) can be described is an overly sophisticated blind idiot.

Anonymous No. 16212699

>>16212260
>G-spot
is not a thing
>male G-spot
is doubly not a thing

Anonymous No. 16212838

>>16212280
no, but you can still have pregnancy even if you don't have an uterus. it's called ectopic pregnancy and even though it's theoretically possible, nobody has tried it in real life

Anonymous No. 16212868

>>16212531
cumming while shitting is exactly what nature intended

Anonymous No. 16212923

>>16212260
gay sex causes incontinence and anal cancer