🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:00:00 UTC No. 16212408
>/sci/ midwits will still find a way to downplay this
https://newatlas.com/medical/colore
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:08:59 UTC No. 16212428
>>16212408
>5-10% of a specific cancer
ok
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:25:54 UTC No. 16212457
>>16212408
wow! that's amazing!
thank you for sharing
Anonymous at Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:26:59 UTC No. 16212459
>>16212408
Theres a huge discrepancy between the headline and the text
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:20:20 UTC No. 16213156
>>16212459
What is the discrepancy?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:53:38 UTC No. 16213191
>spend millions on wonder drug
or
what if you listen to Thomas Seyfried on how cancer is a mitochodrial disorder that you can fix with keto and an old drug?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06e
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:01:20 UTC No. 16213202
>>16213191
Not all tumours have mutations in energy metabolism.
Some do, and cannot use ketones or fatty acids for fuel, and require glucose.
Some do, and cannot use glucose for fuel, and require ketones or fatty acids.
Unless you have your cancer genotyped, you have no way of knowing if a ketogenic diet will help or hinder your tumour. Making blanket statements like "keto cures cancer" or "tumours can't use ketones" is retarded and gay.
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 07:12:28 UTC No. 16213212
>>16213202
yes, blanket statements are limited BUT the role of simply changing what you eat in cancer is something more people should be interested in instead of spending millions on drugs
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 08:46:06 UTC No. 16213328
>>16213212
I'm not the one who said "cancer can be treated by keto"
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:51:57 UTC No. 16217264
>>16213191
There are a lot of proposed cancer treatments centered around changing diets. The belief is something along the lines of cancer being an environmental condition, which is one step away from terrain theory.
There was that recent article posted here about some kind of proteins signalling cancer up to 7 years prior to diagnosis which is quite surprising.
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 19:59:21 UTC No. 16217829
>>16212898
>the best way to kill cancer is to kill the host
100% effective!
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 20:00:45 UTC No. 16217838
>>16213202
>Oops, I forgot to denounce the article headline for being similarly deceiving.
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 20:10:06 UTC No. 16217873
id rather die of ass cancer than pay a single dollar to the pharma industry
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 20:20:46 UTC No. 16217901
>>16217838
not him but I immediately understood what the writer meant when reading the title, but I can see how people could think it's misleading. Nobody with some medical literacy would think researchers would conduct a human trial with all types of cancers mixed up together. Only someone who doesn't really understand what cancer might think that.
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 20:57:04 UTC No. 16218006
>>16212408
https://www.upi.com/Health_News/202
doesn't matter if I can't afford it
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 06:46:22 UTC No. 16218985
>>16212408
>/sci/ midwits will still find a way to downplay this
they're dismissive of important information precisely because they are midwits
low iq people do dumb things and behave stupidly, thats their nature
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:59:53 UTC No. 16220934
>>16213156
The headline is 30pt and the text is only 14