Image not available

921x509

1641942980751.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16212645

I haven't' paid attention to covid mRNA vax stuff since Kevin showed that sections integrate into the victim's DNA.

Is there anything about it affecting germ cells yet? Has this been looked at?

Anonymous No. 16212671

That crap is a lottery with stupid prizes, nothing positive at all. Only complete ignorant morons want to get vaccinated.

Image not available

800x511

h9BAIZ.jpg

Anonymous No. 16217146

Anonymous No. 16217908

the whole point of getting vaccinated is that your cells will be able to "recognize" the pathogen and produce antigens. conventional vaccines just insert one protein that is found on the "surface" of the virus. mRNA vaccines are a little different. They insert a piece of the mRNA of the virus so that your body will produce the protein by itself. if yk basic biology yk that mRNA has codons which "get translated" the aminoacids (the building blocks of proteins) so the spike protein of the virus gets produced. then your cells recognize that it isnt naturally found in the body and antigens are produced. your dna has nothing to do with this process retarded ass nigga

Anonymous No. 16217914

i hope ur brain rots from drinking unpasteurized milk faggot

Image not available

800x789

1702093779246.png

Anonymous No. 16218122

>>16217914

Anonymous No. 16218939

>>16218122
i literally have a biochemistry dergree?

Anonymous No. 16218949

the ignorance of the average person about how basic biology concepts (such as that DNA replication, DNA transcription and and mRNA translation are different procedures) never ceases to amaze me

Anonymous No. 16218969

>>16218949
How about reverse transcription?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35723296/
>Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

Anonymous No. 16219025

>>16218969
Isn't this the study where they used like 1 million times the normal vaccine dose to get it to happen?

Anonymous No. 16219029

>>16218969
>>16219025
Also
>At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome

Anonymous No. 16219938

>>16217908
Dunning-Kruger on display.

Roughly 8% of the human genome is composed of ancient viral DNA. These endogenous retroviruses create the reverse transcriptase enzyme to convert their RNA genome into DNA. The retrovirus also encodes for integrase, which facilitates the insertion of this viral DNA into the host's genome.

A supposed mRNA vaccine could encode reverse transcriptase and integrase, and insert arbitrary genetic code into the recipient's genome.

Anonymous No. 16219997

>>16219029
>>16219025
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9141755/
The major advantage of mRNA vaccines over more conventional approaches is their potential for rapid development and large-scale deployment in pandemic situations. In the current COVID-19 crisis, two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been conditionally approved and broadly applied, while others are still in clinical trials. However, there is no previous experience with the use of mRNA vaccines on a large scale in the general population. This warrants a careful evaluation of mRNA vaccine safety properties by considering all available knowledge about mRNA molecular biology and evolution. Here, I discuss the pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes. Surprisingly, this notion is widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question. This discrepancy becomes even more puzzling if one considers previous work on the molecular and evolutionary aspects of retroposition in murine and human populations that clearly documents the frequent integration of mRNA molecules into genomes, including clinical contexts. By performing basic comparisons, I show that the sequence features of mRNA vaccines meet all known requirements for retroposition using L1 elements—the most abundant autonomously active retrotransposons in the human genome. In fact, many factors associated with mRNA vaccines increase the possibility of their L1-mediated retroposition. I conclude that is unfounded to a priori assume that mRNA-based therapeutics do not impact genomes and that the route to genome integration of vaccine mRNAs via endogenous L1 retroelements is easily conceivable. This implies that we urgently need experimental studies that would rigorously test for the potential retroposition of vaccine mRNAs. At present, the insertional mutagenesis safety of mRNA-based vaccines should be considered unresolved.

Anonymous No. 16220091

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8168329/
this study basically confirms that the vaccines can insert their dna into your genome but says it's okay because covid was so horrible, despite the case numbers and death counts being completely fabricated

Anonymous No. 16220096

>>16220091
it also says in every other gene therapy experiment viral shedding is to be expected and subjects should be carefully quarantined

Anonymous No. 16220114

>>16212645
Two more weeks till vaxxie mass die off. Trust the plan. The elites and normies have done great harm to you by not going along with your internet free thinker meme based ideas. They will come to regret it. They will suffer. They will all suffer!

Anonymous No. 16220125

>>16220114
what exactly possesses somebody to post this shit? there is clear and overwhelming evidence that these injections can alter the human genome but instead of discussing the scientific literature they just resort to snarky gaslighting

Image not available

649x572

18d.png

Anonymous No. 16221074

Anonymous No. 16222279

>>16219938
>A supposed mRNA vaccine could encode reverse transcriptase and integrase, and insert arbitrary genetic code into the recipient's genome.
it can't do that if you're not dumb enough to take an untested experimental injection for a nonexistent viral epidemic

Anonymous No. 16222319

>>16212671
>>16217146
>>16217908
>>16217914
>>16218122
>>16218939
>>16218949
>>16218969
>>16219025
>>16219029
>>16219938
>>16219997
>>16220091
>>16220096
>>16220114
>>16220125
>>16221074
>>16222279
so no studies showing the levels of genomic integration?

Anonymous No. 16223703

>>16212645
Kevin?

Image not available

720x597

IMG_1688.jpg

Anonymous No. 16224215

>>16217908
>conventional vaccines just insert one protein that is found on the "surface" of the virus.

Anonymous No. 16225068

>>16223703
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G917QmY2mBI

Image not available

485x495

88e93g.png

Anonymous No. 16226227

Image not available

1064x1327

cancer.jpg

Anonymous No. 16227813

>>16226227

Anonymous No. 16228934

There is no scientific evidence that covid-19 vaccines cause modification of the patient's DNA.

Anonymous No. 16228962

No matter how hard you fools try, the vaccine was 10x safer than the virus it prevented.

Anonymous No. 16229003

>>16220091
That's not what the study says. It merely says there is a risk of DNA integrating with cells (not evidence). There is no study, there is no data. This is closer to being an essay than a scientific study, and a very poorly written one at that. They go off on tangents about neanderthals.

Anonymous No. 16229007

>>16228934
Why do you think the retards/shills itt care about scientific evidence?
>>16228962
>UHM ACTUALLY.... A MILLION DEATHS IS LITERALLY NOTHING AND THEY WERE JUST GONNA DIE ANYWAY LOL BUT 10 CASES OF HEART FAILURE IS A HECKIN WEF SPONSORED HOLOCAUST!!!!

Anonymous No. 16229858

>>16229003
>vaxxxxie cope

Anonymous No. 16229875

>>16229003
how amazing that there is still no study

Anonymous No. 16230891

>get vaxxx'd
>die
don't say you weren't warned

Anonymous No. 16231934

>>16225068
Wow, over 60,000 citations and he says the covid vax is poison. What do the vaccinated posters of /sci/ think about this?

Anonymous No. 16232953

>>16219029
these tiny pieces will make a mess inside the cell and nucleus

Anonymous No. 16234008

>>16231934
>What do the vaccinated posters of /sci/ think about this?
science denialist thoughts, most likely

Anonymous No. 16235041

>>16234008
science denialist, but not soiyence denialist

Anonymous No. 16235042

>>16235041
QUICK, BUMP THIS THREAD FROM PAGE 10!!!

Anonymous No. 16235867

>>16235042
You're incoherent with rage, you clearly aren't on /sci/ to discuss science, so why don't you just clear out?

Anonymous No. 16237373

>>16212645
You don't need to pay attention or worry about that stuff unless you were clueless enough to take an untested experimental injection for a nonexistent viral epidemic.
Feels good being high IQ enough to be unvax'd

Image not available

1284x1268

heterosexuality.jpg

Anonymous No. 16238307

>>16237373

Anonymous No. 16238904

>>16237373
No it matters for the future of humanity. If germ cells are contaminated, it's the biggest of deals and that information is important when planning for the future.
It's honestly strange how even non-retard vax dodgers just shrug their shoulders at this key piece of information about the future of humanity.

Anonymous No. 16239011

>>16226227
If one famous person has cancer then hundreds or thousands more have it. You didn't see this in 2019.

Anonymous No. 16239208

>>16220125

There is no frontal lobe involved here, it is an appeal to authority with a retarded statement copied from other monkeys to suppress the "tribe outliers". They literally expect a pad on the head from their perceived social authority for being a good person and not an "outlier"