🧵 How Is He Coping?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 21:53:28 UTC No. 16218126
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:07:32 UTC No. 16218146
With what? Being spot on about Elon Musk?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:29:28 UTC No. 16218201
>mars by 2024 right guys? right??? the timelines were wrong. I am very smart!!!
He should go back to debating 80 IQ creationists
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 22:37:34 UTC No. 16218225
We already know how this ends for him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdc
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 23:25:34 UTC No. 16218337
>>16218126
Who?
Anonymous at Thu, 6 Jun 2024 23:35:15 UTC No. 16218364
>>16218126
not at all, still in full denial stage.
called the engineers working at spacex (not just musk individually, but everyone working on starship at spacex) "morons" and said they just cheer every time something explodes.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 00:49:36 UTC No. 16218533
>>16218126
link to his livestream of the launch?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 01:19:12 UTC No. 16218566
>>16218364
Well that's what's happening
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:12:55 UTC No. 16218650
>>16218126
>No payload
>No circumnavigation of the planet in orbit
>No science experiments
>No propellant transfer
>Zero reusable portions of the rocket recovered
No way that huge hunk of junk is going to The Moon, let alone Mars.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 02:18:43 UTC No. 16218665
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 03:19:11 UTC No. 16218756
>>16218650
>No science experiments
Wow, really? What a waste of a good launch. They should definitely do at least mystery goo stuff if they want to speedrun career mode.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 03:21:29 UTC No. 16218757
>>16218665
that's just elon time
he will do it eventually
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 03:30:14 UTC No. 16218772
>>16218665
How many years until you're a woman?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 04:32:16 UTC No. 16218832
>>16218772
you ACTUALLY believe that he's going to do it? LOL!!!!!!
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 04:34:24 UTC No. 16218834
>>16218665
At least Elon is actually making strides in Space exploration. NASA is still planning to use single-use rockets that cost billions. Before SpaceX, public interest in space (at least in the US and other Western countries) had pretty much bottomed out. Now, people are getting excited about it again.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 04:38:03 UTC No. 16218841
>>16218832
No I don't think that poster can become a woman
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:20:58 UTC No. 16218893
He did a 2 hour stream concurrent with the starship launch of him coping
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:42:36 UTC No. 16218910
>>16218893
Link?
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:53:37 UTC No. 16218918
>>16218910
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn2
after the second stage splashes down and the space x guys cheer he calls him all morons lol
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:56:06 UTC No. 16218920
>>16218910
you can find it yourself on youtube by searching for thunderf00t, i'm not boosting your videos, phil.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 06:13:39 UTC No. 16218946
>>16218665
I think he means 10 years after Starship begins commercial payloads.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:54:43 UTC No. 16219122
>>16218126
Cant believe i used to watch this clown back in the day. He turned full retard kek
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:55:45 UTC No. 16219123
>>16218533
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rn2
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:15:35 UTC No. 16219142
>>16218834
He's not doing anything but fucking around.
Starship won't work due to the complexity of having to orchestrate so many launches alone.
So if you need to design another spaceship altogether what was the point of wasting so much time and resources on Starship in the first place?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:40:16 UTC No. 16219168
>>16219129
Funny to see him invoking the Scott Adams meltdown when Dilbertboy was still in denial about how stupid he had been about the injections. But Adams eventually accepted his mistake and went on a redemption arc, using white preservation as his new cause. What will be Phil's new cause once he sees he can't hold ground on SpaceX being trash? My guess is tranny rights, complete with an apology tour for his anti-feminism days.
>>16218834
It's interesting to see how much the left has suddenly turned against space programs. There's always been a fringe who complained about money going to rockets instead of gibs but now that the disloyal Iron Man has turned out to be a chud, even the IFLS! wing of leftism has turned against space projects.
It was amusing to see Bill Nye die inside when he was on some leftist talk show panel and everyone else was shitting all over space programs while Bill tried to defend them but at the same time knew he couldn't disagree strongly with the rest of the panel without risking cancellation.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:58:15 UTC No. 16219190
>>16218946
No he seriously meant in 10 years from the moment he answered the question. It's the same as the fsd being always 6 months to a year away or "the next build". Musk is a salesman, he's good at creating hype and exploiting the people that get suckered into it, that's it.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:52:38 UTC No. 16219404
Thundercope
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:54:20 UTC No. 16219407
>>16219404
Mars never happening
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:59:41 UTC No. 16219422
>>16219168
>It's interesting to see how much the left has suddenly turned against space programs.
I think a lot of just boils down to the fact that many leftists hate Elon. Thus, they feel the need to hate everything associated with him (i.e. space exploration). I think envy is also a big part of it.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:01:04 UTC No. 16219425
>>16219407
Agreed
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:15:41 UTC No. 16219461
>>16219422
Space is cancelled.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:48:34 UTC No. 16219526
>>16219129
Man, he looks more and more like a troon every day. The only thing that's failing are his T-levels.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:56:23 UTC No. 16219535
>>16219129
Lmao this is incredible. "Hahaha look how much of a dumb dumb the world's richest man is! He just launched another rocket!"
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:06:56 UTC No. 16219661
>>16219123
the comments are hilarious!
I also liked how during the boostback he was for some reason convinced the booster was gonna explode, and said "well that's another 30 engines gone" as if that wasn't always going to be the case.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:21:18 UTC No. 16219696
>>16219661
Every view is more money into Phil's pocket.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:35:15 UTC No. 16219735
>>16219129
Yeah he's obviously seething but he's not wrong that musk peddles bullshit/value at a ~10-1 ratio
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:40:05 UTC No. 16219748
>>16218665
Wow he looks so young. Time has aged him.
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:40:47 UTC No. 16219750
>>16219748
Fag
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:45:34 UTC No. 16219762
>>16219750
It should be passed right now. Plus I passed it to my best.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:45:35 UTC No. 16219763
>>16219168
>It was amusing to see Bill Nye die inside when he was on some leftist talk show panel
Have you got a link to that?
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:46:36 UTC No. 16219767
>>16219763
Shut up faggit
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:49:08 UTC No. 16219779
>>16218364
>Haha look at these retards making a living out of sending rockets into space. They should be sperging behind a screen like me
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:05:34 UTC No. 16219816
>>16218126
Hes right tho, what happens here is this launch was a "success" compared to the previous ones that were a complete disaster. It was a suborbital flight, no pez check, no raptor reenlight, no payload simulation. Imagine if NASA had to destroy 4 shuttle just for "testing" LMAO. They did it in the first attemp and with crew
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:05:50 UTC No. 16219817
>>16219696
I don't care how much money other people have.
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:07:09 UTC No. 16219822
>>16219817
Sit on my faec
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:17:25 UTC No. 16219846
>>16219816
>Imagine if NASA had to destroy 4 shuttle just for "testing"
probably would have resulted in less exploded shuttles and dead astronauts. NASA is the #1 killer of them after all
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:21:00 UTC No. 16219860
>>16219763
Probably this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yy7
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:21:47 UTC No. 16219863
>>16219817
why not
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:22:36 UTC No. 16219866
>>16219860
Thanks
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:22:51 UTC No. 16219867
>>16219863
It's that simple eh?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:26:08 UTC No. 16219876
>>16219860
>Why would I care about Mars when Donald Trump is number one in the polls?
Textbook example of a single track mind.
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:27:33 UTC No. 16219880
>>16219867
I can win this alone. I didn't lie about my knowledge. I can list all animal, insect, Gorgonite like that glowy jellyfish octal in the sea, and all others. From +4 to -4 category, if I want. I can list all tech from era 1 to era 14 possible to learn from this angle and if I don't list it all I needed was the scent to even be able to construct it. My hands are trained through eyes, I'm probably the best fighter if a little understreched. My mental skills are too good, more than poetically doing hard stuff, like champion rank of poetic category. I know so much about dimensional war. You could call this the Paragon of the crypt in the pyramid. I am many grades maxed out. If it is as simple as why not, you're in for victory assured.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:30:07 UTC No. 16219886
>>16218201
He's doing exactly that. That's what Musktards are.
Vard at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:30:46 UTC No. 16219887
>>16219876
I believe it's more than why not. The enemy has added an additional layer. I'm trying to remove it now
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:46:37 UTC No. 16219928
ThunderCunt is a faggot
Elon Musk is a grifting con-man faggot
/sci/ is a faggot farm that produces faggots like the two above. All faggot ass crabs in a bucket to me.
TYFCTMTT
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:36:39 UTC No. 16220039
>>16219816
>It was a suborbital flight, no pez check, no raptor reenlight, no payload simulation
no fuel tank, no srbs, no launch, no orbit. You can't call a plane landing on a runway a "success". The wright brothers did that in the 1910s lmao
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:40:13 UTC No. 16220043
>>16219816
>Imagine if NASA had to destroy 4 shuttle just for "testing" LMAO. They did it in the first attemp and with crew
Yeah nasa waited until school teachers were on it. Too bad congress shut them down after only 2 shuttles destroyed
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:06:57 UTC No. 16220104
>>16219696
adblock
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:56:13 UTC No. 16220192
>>16220043
Wake me up when Elon the faggot rides on Starship. It's a death trap and he knows it. He's never once mentioned flying to space on any of his rockets. He put some of his top cultists in the kill seat with Dear Moon, no way Elon was going to explode on a live stream! Thankfully for the Elon seals Dear Moon is scrubbed. Some of those simps have kids unfortunately.
Branson and Bezos both ran some of the first human test flights of their rockets. Musk the man obsessed with space seems in no rush to visit it for the first time. Strange right?
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:11:09 UTC No. 16220213
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:20:45 UTC No. 16220237
>>16219928
>>16219886
I still believe in hydrogen fueled vehicle
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:25:00 UTC No. 16220246
>>16219860
Oof. I think that Bill has done some silly things in recent years, but I really feel sorry for him here.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:42:44 UTC No. 16220293
>>16220043
>>16219846
Shuttle: 2 fails in 135 launches
Starship: 4 fails in 4 launches
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:44:48 UTC No. 16220299
>>16220039
Nigga what are you saying? Im talking about STS-1.
Spx fags started watching spaceflights in 2016 LMAO
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 18:59:30 UTC No. 16220327
>>16220293
Flight 4 was the first rocket launch to ever exceed its goals if you think about
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:03:32 UTC No. 16220333
He doesn't give a shit anymore and his audience are mostly EDS flat earthers from tiktok
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:04:01 UTC No. 16220449
>>16219142
>complexity of having to orchestrate so many launches
There are airports that have like 800 flights per day. There's 100,000 flights on the Earth per day.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:12:39 UTC No. 16220461
>>16220293
For just 10x the price you can kill everyone on board? What a deal
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:42:38 UTC No. 16220537
>>16219129
Shitting on the melted upper stage is zug brain tier stuff. It's a testament to the design that it managed a full re entry and soft landing while shedding who knows how many tiles and control surfaces being ripped apart. Meanwhile the shuttle has a damaged tile in the wrong place and auto-explodes.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 21:14:26 UTC No. 16220611
>>16220246
Bill voted for this.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:47:32 UTC No. 16220799
>>16220611
Still, it pains me to see people willingly throw water on exciting advances in space travel over partisan politics.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:49:04 UTC No. 16220804
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:23:59 UTC No. 16221039
>>16220299
which is not even close to the first shuttle test
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:28:25 UTC No. 16221044
>>16220192
Yeah it must be because of all those crew dragon deaths that never happened
In all seriousness though I think Branson's sub orbital plane is dangerous and rolling the dice. It's not simple like bezos's sub orbital parachute capsule.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:34:12 UTC No. 16221048
>>16219142
while you were asleep in 2023 spacex launched 96 rockets, up from 61 in 2022. Thats 3.8 days between launches on average. Even the most damning estimates say you need 15 launches to fill the fuel depot, that's achievable before too much boil off happens. And your prize is getting over 100 tons to the moon instead of golf cart
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:39:10 UTC No. 16221049
>>16220293
It's impressive they did so much with that death trap but the problem is you can't fix the second failure mode of the shuttle.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:50:55 UTC No. 16221055
its crazy how there are so many elon dick riders on a science board
let me ask you this, how is tesla, solar roof tops and the hyperloop doing?
spoiler alert: not good
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:53:27 UTC No. 16221058
>>16221055
elongated muskrat bros....... we got too cocky
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:54:46 UTC No. 16221059
>>16221055
Oh look, the lonely troll with no one to talk to has arrived to make the thread about him.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 01:57:30 UTC No. 16221061
>>16221059
lol lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:26:08 UTC No. 16221106
>>16221055
I gotta admit your mom's sex life makes more green
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:44:34 UTC No. 16221198
>>16220293
>Shuttle: 14 dead and 1 payload destroyed
>Starship: 0 dead, 0 payloads destroyed
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:13:19 UTC No. 16221233
>>16221198
>space shuttle 830 million lost in crashes and incidents
>starship 1.2 billion lost in crashes and accidents per launch
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:19:57 UTC No. 16221243
>>16221233
>price of a human life: $0
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:21:49 UTC No. 16221247
>>16218126
I see you were kind and used a picture of him from about 15 years ago, when he looked like a cross between Fred Flintstone and Yassir Arafat.
These days he looks like Lady Galadriel with facial hair.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:22:50 UTC No. 16221250
>>16221233
>What is inflation?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 05:53:51 UTC No. 16221392
>>16221233
bro a normal rocket is like, 50 million. Even if that's wrong, starship doesn't cost over thousand million, for fucks sake lmao
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:56:02 UTC No. 16221458
>>16221247
When you age and your t drops it'll happen to you too. That's life
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:23:03 UTC No. 16221626
What would this ugly mf do if Elon Musk wasn't there?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:08:57 UTC No. 16221826
>>16221233
>starship 1.2 billion lost in crashes and accidents per launch
LOL, you pulled that number out of your ass.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:12:01 UTC No. 16221833
>>16221626
Make hundreds of twenty to thirty minute videos about Kickstarter scams that are better debunked by EEVBlog and bigclivedotcom.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:18:15 UTC No. 16221837
>>16221833
>bigclivedotcom
based
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:36:55 UTC No. 16221858
>>16221626
Full time chemistry, maybe.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:40:42 UTC No. 16221861
>>16218665
>>16218201
Even if it's 30 years instead of 10, what's the difference?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:53:31 UTC No. 16221878
>>16218126
Why is he like that?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 14:06:40 UTC No. 16221904
>>16221878
All you need:
>Hyper loop was genuinely a retarded idea from every angle
>Cyber truck should have been cancelled when they realized it had to have a traditional endoskeleton
>Musk has an uncontrollable urge to spurt out unrealistic dates
Now repeat these in every video to stretch them out to 20 min
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:02:32 UTC No. 16221969
>>16221878
Money is a hell of a drug.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:16:42 UTC No. 16222327
>>16221861
>it don't matter if i'm a 30 year old or 50
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 21:59:16 UTC No. 16222957
>>16221878
Smarter every day seems like a pretty good guy and I think he's a positive force on balance, but I have to admit it will be my guilty pleasure when starship passes more milestones and his talk looks more clueless and impotent "every day". He deserves to live a happy life, but he also deserves public humiliation for that pussy tier graduation speech that was also dead fucking wrong. The apollo guys weren't playing it safe, repeating something that had already been done with a playbook. And there's no point in repeating apollo. We already know that can be done and we don't need more moonrocks. We need a serious path to put more mass on other bodies, and a higher likelyhood a failure isn't a reason to do apollo again.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 02:24:12 UTC No. 16223518
>>16222957
You're dead wrong on your assessment of the guy. He works for the military industrial complex. His content is state sponsored
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 02:49:48 UTC No. 16223561
>>16223518
Yeah that's fair to say. But I also think that's his real opinion even if its obviously influenced. People generally agree with the politics of their associates. Also most people that work for the MIC aren't evil, they just fail to notice it's a tax payer wealth transfer to the industry establishment. The top people who are in the room for the war economy conversations can go fuck themselves though
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:47:26 UTC No. 16224189
>>16223561
>tax payer wealth transfer to the industry establishment
With a side effect of internal death and destruction.
>just following orders
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:42:26 UTC No. 16224489
>>16224483
They have to pay it. He's intertwined with the brand. Once the marketing guru is gone they'll be eaten by competitors
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 15:54:02 UTC No. 16224676
>>16222957
>We need a serious path to put more mass on other bodies
why? there's fuckall on Mars.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:57:55 UTC No. 16224970
here are the best moments of his live coping to flight 4
https://youtu.be/86NjizfRGyk?si=tiO
how long until he transitions?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:10:13 UTC No. 16225016
>>16224970
Seems to already be in process.
>>16224489
It'd be interesting if they didn't pay up so he sold all his shares to a legacy automaker and washed his hands of the business. Is there a Tim Cook waiting in the shadows to take over from Musk?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:10:24 UTC No. 16225154
>>16219168
>It was amusing to see Bill Nye die inside when he was on some leftist talk show panel and everyone else was shitting all over space programs while Bill tried to defend them but at the same time knew he couldn't disagree strongly with the rest of the panel without risking cancellation.
He truly deserves this.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:12:47 UTC No. 16225162
>>16221049
The white paint on the ET was structural.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 19:16:14 UTC No. 16225171
>>16224489
>>16224483
Tesla (and the rest of the EV market) is a sinking ship. Everybody who wants an EV already has an EV so it's becoming exponentially more difficult to sell new ones. The electric EV mandate laws will soon be undone, that's a game of chicken governments are going to lose; either the mandates get revoked or populist parties come to power and revoke them anyway.
Anyway, Elon would be wise to cash out from Tesla now. He should focus on SpaceX and Starlink.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 20:53:46 UTC No. 16225340
>>16218146
>Elon Musk is scamming the government!!!1!!
Yes. Good for him. When will you statist cucks (such as thundercUNt) understand that the government is not and never will be your friend? What makes you think a group of people are going to any better than another group of people at running things just because the first group calls themselves the government?
Dumber still, the government (unlike every buisness on the planet) is allowed to steal from you, imprison you, and enslave you as cannon fodder.
Why are you statist cucks so fucking repulsive?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 20:55:28 UTC No. 16225343
>>16218834
NASA is a jobs program. Why expect sustainable things from it?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:00:18 UTC No. 16225356
>>16222327
It doesn't matter. Only thing to worry about is if civilization collapses before a colony is self sustaining.
Most interesting thing about an off world colony is the implications for the dysgenic cycle: If you live in a colony which requires fancy technology to not die, the members of the colony need to have high intelligence to stay alive. So they'll need eugenics of some kind to prevent decay due to dysgenic selection pressures.
I don't think a colony will be made in our civilizational cycle, nor that it would survive if it was. But its fun to think about earth 2000 years from now (after coming out of dark ages again) going to mars or the moon and finding intact civilizations on them.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:02:21 UTC No. 16225360
>>16221878
Musk, though suckling the governemnt teat, is less pro-government than most defense contractors. This offends thundercunts leftist beliefs that the state solves everything. He's a nuclear engineer; they're selected to love the government, can't have someone unloyal to the crown getting an understanding of the secret sauce.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:05:06 UTC No. 16225374
>>16222957
What even was his point in that video?
I quite half when he waffled around for a half hour making no interesting points or anecdotes at all.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:15:52 UTC No. 16225403
>>16219190
Ambitious deadlines are important because people will actually work to try to meet them; if you give people slack then people will allow work to expand to fill the time... and in either case there will always be delays due to complexity and unforeseeable events. It's something any competent manager understands. It's not just hype.
SpaceX might be 5 years behind on their schedule but the competition is a decade or two behind them...
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:18:01 UTC No. 16225407
>>16225356
Gene editing will be the norm on any colony
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:31:00 UTC No. 16225434
>>16220799
Humans have always been retarded. Being intelligent is an anomaly. It's amazing we have so much civilizational progress in spite of that, with smarter people trying as best they can to herd the NPCs.
The good things about all these anti-elon anti-SpaceX creatures is that its an instant indicator of their intelligence (or their allegiance) so you can just proceed to dismiss their drivel.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:34:37 UTC No. 16225444
>>16224489
>they'll be eaten by competitors
This is exactly what they want to achieve, its a corpo sabotage.
But it's not just about cars, it's about AI and humanoid robots.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:37:12 UTC No. 16225448
>>16225356
>its fun to think about earth 2000 years from now (after coming out of dark ages again) going to mars or the moon and finding intact civilizations on them.
Yes, except we are the ones that are about to find out...
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:42:09 UTC No. 16225463
>>16219123
His fucking landing of starship was insufferable
>Why the fuck is going so slow on decent?
>Why the fuck isn't it landing yet?
>Why are there sparks? Fucking sparks!?!?!?
>Why is it on the camera not clean?
>Uhh 'success'? It had a fire!
LOOK AT ALL THOSE IDIOTS WHO DID SOMETHING THAT WAS NEVER DONE BEFORE! FUCK CELEBRATING!
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:45:18 UTC No. 16225470
>>16221861
20 years.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:01:54 UTC No. 16225502
>>16225407
I hope so. Free market genetic engineering is the only practice eugenics I think. Paying retards not to breed is too expensive, sterilizing retards against their will is too hard with leftists around.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:02:55 UTC No. 16225506
>>16225448
Doubt it. We'd've seen them from telescopes long ago and confirmed their presence with the first probes.
sage at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:04:10 UTC No. 16225512
>>16218126
jealous kike lost his mind
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:31:28 UTC No. 16225604
>>16220293
ok, let's use your logic. Astronauts killed:
> SpaceX: 0
> NASA: 18
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:34:45 UTC No. 16225612
>>16220293
So we just going to forget the thousands of expendable rockets made and tossed just to get to the point where a shuttle was possible?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 22:35:28 UTC No. 16225614
>>16219860
Jesus, Americans are so dumb
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 23:57:11 UTC No. 16225810
>>16225374
he was saying very nicely, with humor, and trying not to step on any toes, that we need to pay old space contractors a lot of money to do the exact same thing we did in the 60s and 70s so we can't fail.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 23:59:26 UTC No. 16225812
>>16224676
Well one day earth is going to get nailed by a cosmic extinction event, and that event might not be on mars
But we can also mine materials that are rare on earth, it doesn't have to be mars. There's the moon and asteroids
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:11:19 UTC No. 16225832
>>16224676
No troons or jews either
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:29:41 UTC No. 16225867
>>16225810
Yeah I finally watched the rest of the video.
The problem with what he's saying is that artemis is supposed to be more than a flag planting mission, of course building a permanent moon base is gonna be more complicated than apollo, expanding goals is not a bad thing.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:20:47 UTC No. 16225925
>>16219129
>quibbling about timeline promises
Who cares. Better late than never
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:26:36 UTC No. 16225944
>>16219168
I don't know if the left are inherently anti-space, they're just being partisan contrarians that are mad because Elon is doing it because they see him as being part of team chud and team chud is bad.
They had no complaints about the USSR going to space, in fact they constantly boast about all the firsts the soviets did at the beginning of the space race.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:30:15 UTC No. 16225950
>>16224970
he looks like my disgusting estranged NEET pedophile uncle if he was also a flaming faggot
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:35:38 UTC No. 16225958
>>16219123
>ohh its over!
>nothing happens
>bye bye starship!
>nothing happens
>its gonna pop any second now!
>nothing happens
This is genuinely fucking hilarious
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 02:24:08 UTC No. 16226034
>>16219142
I mean >even< if the in-orbit refueling thing never pans out starship will be miles ahead of any other surface-orbit vehicle, so putting a small upper stage in orbit or assembling large deep space craft will be easier than it is now anyways.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 02:50:27 UTC No. 16226068
>>16223518
so everything said by Popeye's employees is approved and endorsed by Popeye's? You are retarded, I don't think even the U.S government itself knows what it supports
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:14:51 UTC No. 16226103
>>16224676
It's teeming with iron, which makes it ripe for industrialization. It won't be a barren lifeless planet forever; eventually we will find a way to terraform it.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:53:54 UTC No. 16226251
>>16219129
I don't really understand why he's so blastingly angry at Elon.
Dude's a just hypeman. His purpose is pitch his projects to investors, sometimes that necessitates making outrageously optimistic claims.
Maybe TF is simply jealous that the silly clickbait employed in his video titles aren't as lucrative as Elon's hypercharged hyperbole.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:17:42 UTC No. 16226479
>>16226103
>>16225812
If we had the technology to do anything useful on Mars, we'd have the technology to save earth. Space is just a vanity project.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:37:05 UTC No. 16226514
>>16225356
Ancient Rome was a shithole with a 50% child mortality rate due to disease.
Life quality was not high.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:46:01 UTC No. 16226521
>>16226479
>we'd have the technology to save earth
>we'd have the technology to stop a gamma ray burst
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:19:48 UTC No. 16226547
>>16226251
YouTube is his primary means of support now. His job as a chemist at an EU institution is stagnant and it's much easier to get money and attention on YouTube doing "I hate this" videos. Conservative estimates are that he's made over $600,000 from YouTube so far. He also has Patreon as another revenue stream. In pic related you can see how awful the salaries are for chemists in the Czech Republic where he lives.
Being a Musk hater is lucrative and Phil staked out that ground early. There are tons of other Musk hating channels but Phil has a decade of experience with making "I hate" videos so the algorithm favors him and he knows how to get clicks. YouTube allows him to live like royalty in the Czech Republic and he'd have to go back to being a middle class normie nobody without it.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:32:31 UTC No. 16226559
>>16226547
>the Czech Republic where he lives
why the fuck would he move there in the first place?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:54:49 UTC No. 16226578
>>16218146
/thread
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:10:28 UTC No. 16226602
>>16226559
He was butthurt over Brexit so he rage quit the UK and apparently the job in CZ was the only one he could find in his field.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:49:13 UTC No. 16226699
>>16218665
Musk is an entrepeneur, he's great at building businesses and hyping people up for bullshit.
Who cares what he promised of course he's going to lie , that's marketing. Fact is he's built the most successful private rocket company, nobody comes close.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:54:31 UTC No. 16226709
>>16219129
>noooooo you can't celebrate a great feat of engineering because the ceo promises bullshit all the time!!!1!
Phil you should hatefuck with Musk already, you must be thinking about him more than your own wife.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:08:21 UTC No. 16226724
>>16226709
Thunderf00t has never been in a romantic relationship that anyone knows about.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:16:47 UTC No. 16226741
>>16226724
Explains a lot. Probably puts his dick into his vacuum pump while looking at youtube analytics for release.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:18:16 UTC No. 16226744
>>16226547
Oh my God the kids at the grocery store here make more than that
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:48:43 UTC No. 16226781
>>16226744
If he was making about the phd average on that chart, moving from the UK to the Czech Republic required about a 65%-70% pay cut. All because he was outraged over Brexit.
On the other hand, estimates of his YouTube revenue are in the $70k-$140k range, depending on how long the average viewer watches his drawn out videos, how many ads he allows, and number of YouTube Premium viewers. At this point, it's his chemist job that supplements his YouTube income instead of the other way around.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:09:16 UTC No. 16226812
>>16226781
Letting a Twitter style opinion effect your real world income is insane. What a lunatic. No wonder he's so angry all the time. Tried watching a video after ift4 and I can't believe he's still using the 2012 format.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 14:15:33 UTC No. 16226815
>>16226812
>>16226781
It sounds like he moved there specifically to exploit the low cost of living. A typical practice for ne'er-do-wells. He would have had a pretty big youtube income already by then.
He's effectively a performer. There's no telling what his real feelings about Musk are.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:08:29 UTC No. 16226859
>>16224970
This is actually really sad because you can see a sense of wonder and excitement overtake him just for the briefest moment when the booster splashes down, only for him to choke it back because he happens to hate SpaceX's CEO.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 15:15:40 UTC No. 16226866
there's a good chance something will go wrong in the future which will then give him the ability to say "I told you so!" again and the cycle of shitflinging between musk fans and detractors can continue.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:13:41 UTC No. 16227053
>150 posts of seething
>not a single concrete thing he has said that is actually wrong
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:15:03 UTC No. 16227054
>>16227053
>not a single concrete thing he has said that is actually wrong
"Starship will fail"
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:32:00 UTC No. 16227080
>>16225171
>everybody who wants an EV already has an EV so it's becoming exponentially more difficult to sell new ones.
Model Y is literally the best selling car world-wide as we speak
not EV mind you, car
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:54:38 UTC No. 16227123
>>16227053
What did you expect from Musk's 60 IQ dickriders?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:56:30 UTC No. 16227127
>>16227054
4/4 so far so pretty much spot on that one. If you want to argue that maybe in some possible future with infinite money they may launch starship successfully then you have to quote where that claim was made.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:09:37 UTC No. 16227149
>>16227127
>let's do a static fire test
>static tire test is successful
>REE YOUR TEST DIDNT GO TO ORBIT, FAILURE
>Let's do a low altitude landing test
>low altitude landing test successful
>REEE YOU R TRST DIDNT GO OT THE MOON, FAILURE
>let's do a reentry test
>reentry test successful
>REEE YOUR TEST DIDNT GO TO MARS, FAILURE
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:23:10 UTC No. 16227171
>>16227053
He literally said the Falcon 9 would not be reusable.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:27:41 UTC No. 16227177
>>16221233
Starship costs around 100 million per unit, how the fuck did you get 1.2 billion? Why am I responding to low quality bait?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:32:56 UTC No. 16227187
>>16226547
Yeah as a businessman Thunderf00t is quite clever, maybe unintentionally. He typifies a breed of bitter, contrarian midwit which is very common, thus many people can project themselves onto him.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:42:31 UTC No. 16227200
>>16227149
If your craft always blows up it's not a test you should be conducting nor is it a success. Not to mention they did objectively fail those tests according to their own mission parameters. For instance the orbital hatch test was a failure and causes the ship to tumble uncontrollably. If you want to define it as a success because "well the hatch opened" then I don't know what to say.
>>16227171
Where did he say that?
>>16227177
1.2B is what they got paid for by the US government, they are asking for more.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:49:39 UTC No. 16227210
>>16227149
>>16227200
Also your stupidity is contagious apparently. Did you seriously type that they did a "reentry test" where the rocket disintegrated and you think that's a success? What the fuck.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:12:46 UTC No. 16227241
>>16227210
It reentered tho
Like a few days ago
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:49:40 UTC No. 16227287
>>16226859
he's transitioning
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:34:41 UTC No. 16227375
>>16227200
>Where did he say that?
In 2016 when Falcon 9 was at the same stage in development as Starship is now, he claimed that they would never figure out reusability.
https://youtu.be/BPv0VZcvm4Q?si=GSu
Just skip to 15:52
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:35:42 UTC No. 16227378
>>16227375
Imagine being wrong for 8 years in a row and sticking to it
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:44:56 UTC No. 16227398
>>16227375
He says as of 2016 they never reused any booster which I believe is true. Did you link a wrong video?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:21:22 UTC No. 16227454
>>16227375
And while i'm at it, I want to throw in 2 more meta points. First in 2016 falcon 9 was already a system that was running commercial flights. It's by no means in the "same stage of development as starship", the comparison is hilarious so I'll take another point off you just for that. The second and more important point. Notice the scope of my argument vs yours.
I invite maximum challenge. Literally any statement that is actually wrong. I'm sure you there's some but I will settle for just one. The highest grade of argumentum suplexium basically. You try to tackle said challenge with the safest bet you can find falcon 9 (and fail at that which is doubly hilarious) which isn't even a system he has a problem with. If you look at a post like this
>>16221878
You can see the things he mostly clowns on. It's not actually falcon 9 but everything else. If you had any spine, any courage at all you would actually do a wide defense as well. For instance defend the hyperloop or cybertruck or the boring company or what ever it is that's embarrassing musk at the moment. Instead you create a starwman and then attack it because that's the only thing you can do.
It's frankly incredible how prevalent this kind of mental gymnastic is. Something stupid happens which then gets rightfully mocked and them immediately someone brings up muh falcon 9. I mean fuck the video you linked is the only video in the channel with falcon in the tittle, which is probably why you chose it and the best point you could bring up was that he stated a fact that was 100% correct. I bet it's the same seethers making these threads every time too. Thunderfoot makes a bad 30 minute video, the seether watches it multiple times intently masturbating just waiting for a mistake, can't find any and then proceeds to posts in /sci/ humiliating himself as well. It really is pottery in motion.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:39:34 UTC No. 16227473
>>16227454
I only care about starship
Hyper loop, cyber truck, FSD, boring company, teslabot, are all obviously grifts
But starship might actually work, unironically
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 21:53:21 UTC No. 16227498
>>16227454
All the other endeavors are throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks so he can go to Mars. Solar, batteries, tunnels, all of it. Cybertruck's entire purpose was to use publicly traded Tesla money to research steel and glass for Starship. Falcon 9 might be the best rocket ever made. Starship will be even better. Seeth all you want, I don't care
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:21:26 UTC No. 16227547
>>16227454
how long until you transition, Thunderf00t?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:23:11 UTC No. 16227551
>>16227473
doesn't FSD actually work pretty well now?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:12:41 UTC No. 16227629
>>16226602
>so mad about brexit that you go live in a post-soviet shithole instead
lol. serves him right.
has he renounced his UK citizenship yet?
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:16:24 UTC No. 16227635
>>16227551
no it doesn't, and tesla fanboys and the company itself continuing to act like it does keeps getting people killed. it should not even be legal to call it FSD because it is not fully self-driving
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:17:08 UTC No. 16227636
>>16227629
He claims he moved there due to Brexit but who knows if that's really true. Even by his own admission, his YouTube channel had caused his employer trouble numerous times. Perhaps he was encouraged to leave. It would also explain why he ended up in such a low prestige position after leaving as other potential employers could get chemists who don't come with a bunch of baggage.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:18:29 UTC No. 16227638
>>16227636
makes sense.
based on how he looks, it wouldn't surprise me if the real reason he moved to eastern europe was to rape children
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:20:02 UTC No. 16227643
>>16227053
"Debris field guaranteed"
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:40:16 UTC No. 16227657
>>16226514
It was much better than most places idiot. Trade+Aqueducts = Much less famine and drought = relaxed Darwinian selection pressures
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:42:50 UTC No. 16227663
>>16227498
This. It's been obvious for a long time now that Elon's real passion is space.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:49:03 UTC No. 16227667
>>16226547
Lol people getting into 100,000 monopoly monies to be paid minimum wage. Absolute state of government interference on a free market.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:51:42 UTC No. 16227669
>>16226547
A graph like that really explains why so many people want to exterminate the entirety of the Jewish race.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:06:48 UTC No. 16227686
>>16227669
>da jooz are the only reason anyone would ever pay shit-tier wages
That's just human greed and it is not exclusive to Jews. Rich "people" are not charitable and will never pay you more than they have to.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:42:44 UTC No. 16227726
>>16227454
No you said "1.2 billion lost in crashes and accidents per launch"
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 00:53:53 UTC No. 16227743
>>16227200
No you said "starship 1.2 billion lost in crashes and accidents per launch"
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 01:51:56 UTC No. 16227781
>>16227551
Basically. 4chan refuses to go on youtube and search "fsd" to watch a video of it full self driving. Tesla actually lies about its autonomy level lower than it really is to skirt safety regulations and avoid accountability. It still has plenty of edge cases where it fucks up, it can be deadly even. I wouldn't trust it unless it nails your route to work, and take control if you see something unusual like the broad side of a transfer truck
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:02:00 UTC No. 16227793
>>16227454
How is a screenshot of his youtube channel a strawman lmao. The man is obsessed with elon. If you used to go to his page expecting to see scams debunked, or some drama with internet feminists, it's just an elon tabloid now about everything that might be going bad for elon. It used to be cautionary exposé of scams the audience needs to look out for. It's not a consumer/investor/taxpayer advocacy channel anymore. Like take the worst offender, solar roadways. What if the channel was just documenting everything bad that happens to the solar roadways guy. Who gives a fuck. And it's made less interesting that elon isn't going away and his channel is blueballing his viewers that elon is about to be finished this time, I promise, honestly, for real, this is the one!
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:02:50 UTC No. 16227795
>>16227781
Tesla basically solved the self driving issue, the real issue now is computing. Current Teslas computer is some old shit from AMD that's very underpowered for full self driving, and it's a miracle what they managed to get out of that.
New gen Teslas with more powerful computers from Nvidia or AMD will 100% nail it
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:05:09 UTC No. 16227798
>>16227210
>he doesnt know
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 02:07:00 UTC No. 16227802
>>16227200
>If your craft always blows up it's not a test you should be conducting nor is it a success
You mean like this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvi
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:02:06 UTC No. 16227856
>>16220213
His criticism is that thunderf00ts guesstimate was less than an order of magnitude off??
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:34:36 UTC No. 16227887
>>16227856
In the real world an order of magnitude is a lot.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:36:20 UTC No. 16227891
>>16218126
[math]test[\math]
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 03:48:37 UTC No. 16227900
>>16227887
It's actually not, this is a misconception that arose from the use of calculators. Saturn V was designed with slide rules. You only need ballpark figures to figure out if something is roughly possible, then you refine those figures into a precise engineering solution. Thunderf00ts ballparking is a legitimate way of figuring out if something is a worthwhile pursuit before investing billions of dollars into it :3
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 04:03:33 UTC No. 16227915
>>16227891
[eqn]1 = (\sum x)^2 = \sum x^2 + 2 \sum xy \Rightarrow \sum xy = -\frac{1}{2}[/eqn]
[eqn]2 = (\sum x)(\sum x^2) = \sum x^3 + \sum xy(x+y) \Rightarrow \sum xy(x+y) = -1[/eqn]
[eqn]-\frac{1}{2} = (\sum x)(\sum xy) = \sum xy(x+y) + 3\prod x \Rightarrow \prod x = \frac{1}{6} [/eqn]
[eqn]\frac{1}{4}= (\sum xy)^2 = \sum (xy)^2 +2\prod x (\sum x) = \sum (xy)^2 + \frac{1}{3} \Rightarrow \sum (xy)^2 = -\frac{1}{12} [/eqn]
[eqn]4 = (\sum x^2)^2 = \sum x^4 + 2\sum (xy)^2 \Rightarrow \sum x^4 = \frac{25}{6} [/eqn]
[eqn]-\frac{3}{2} = (\sum xy)(\sum x^3) = \sum xy(x^3+y^3) + \prod x(\sum x^2) =\sum xy(x^3+y^3) + \frac{1}{3} \Rightarrow \sum xy(x^3+y^3) = -\frac{11}{6}[/eqn]
[eqn]\frac{25}{6} = (\sum x)(\sum x^4) = \sum x^5 + \sum xy(x^3+ y^3) = \sum x^5 -\frac{11}{6} \Rightarrow \sum x^5 = 6[/eqn]
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 04:22:44 UTC No. 16227937
>>16227900
>implying that absolutely no engineers or scientists at Space X ever thought to "ballpark" anything until this fat, greasy-haired, nail-painting furfag came along
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 05:26:19 UTC No. 16227979
>>16227793
>How is a screenshot of his youtube channel a strawman lmao
Nice reading comprehension lmao. I said that the screenie wasn't a strawman because those are his actual videos, notice that the poster I replied to didn't point out a flaw in the videos pictured nor a flaw at all, just seethed at something that was 100% correct. Again I invite you to point out a single thing that's actually wrong with any of those videos in the screenshot for instance. I'm still waiting.
>>16227743
I didn't say it. I just said where the anons number came from. SpaceX has spent something along the lines of 4 Billion of US government money on starship program. The number the anon mentioned which is 1.2B per launch is thus roughly correct for 4 launches with spaceX own funding thrown in the mix.
>>16227937
It's fairly clear that either no engineer ballparked projects like hyperloop, boring company, starship, cybertruck, solar roofs, or what ever else musk said in his latest interview or that the leadership didn't listen to the figures and believed in magic. I'm not sure which is worse actually. It's completely irrelevant to say that an engineer who works for hyperloop knows it will fail if the company burns money trying to make it happen anyways. You can't appeal to common sense when these projects constantly defy it.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 05:32:45 UTC No. 16227984
>>16227979
>SpaceX has spent something along the lines of 4 Billion of US government money on starship program. The number the anon mentioned which is 1.2B per launch is thus roughly correct for 4 launches with spaceX own funding thrown in the mix.
No, no they haven't. They haven't even received any money yet for HLS. What the fuck are you smoking?
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 05:52:47 UTC No. 16228012
>>16227900
>Saturn V was designed with slide rules.
Is this oft-repeated non sequitur supposed to mean something? Slide rules are accurate calculation instruments, they're not ballpark devices where you're lucky you get within an order of magnitude.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 05:53:56 UTC No. 16228013
>>16227900
>Thunderf00ts ballparking is a legitimate way of figuring out if something is a worthwhile pursuit
Too bad then he was off by an order of magnitude.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:17:18 UTC No. 16228033
>>16227979
>boring company
Vegas extended the tunnel system btw
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:42:47 UTC No. 16228048
>>16227979
>Again I invite you to point out a single thing that's actually wrong with any of those videos in the screenshot for instance.
Elon is not the largest fraud in american history, won't be bankrupt in 3 years, smarter every day's advice for artemis is fucking terrible, I don't know what 'engineering' is in quotes but gain-of-function research is real, the cybertruck is bulletproof to some bullets, also no one with normal mental health wants to watch this shit
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:49:43 UTC No. 16228058
>>16228048
Concession accepted
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:13:18 UTC No. 16228075
>>16228058
>give me 1
>ok heres 5
>too bad mom said its my turn to win
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:54:46 UTC No. 16228101
>>16228075
I didn't know this.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:36:02 UTC No. 16228157
>>16227900
It's unfortunate that he isn't very good at it.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:02:53 UTC No. 16228188
>>16221878
> he's making at least 7k/month grifting elon
I would do the same desu
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:40:09 UTC No. 16228679
>>16226559
brothels are top tier in Prague
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 01:11:19 UTC No. 16229517
>>16228157
Whatever makes you feel better, anon
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:06:34 UTC No. 16230262
>>16219880
I wish there was a "This user is schizophrenic" report option
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:15:53 UTC No. 16230276
>>16228188
imagine spending 5 years to do a PhD just to girft one of the richest faggot alive for 7k/month while onlyfan models are raking in millions annually just for posting nudes twice every week.
the absolute state of americattle society.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:28:38 UTC No. 16230291
>>16230276
Before his Musk obsession, he was obsessed with Anita Sarkeesian. That made him money from the anti-feminists but nothing like what she was making from grifting corporations such as Intel, who put $300 million into her and other identity political campaigns.
Still, it's not a bad living he has going on and better than just being a lab rat, pumping out papers that never get read. There are thousands of other chemists with jobs similar to his who toil away in obscurity, living off of whatever grant money they can hustle up.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:43:17 UTC No. 16230308
>>16230291
>Intel, who put $300 million into her and other identity political campaigns
fuck, China need to take over everything as soon as possible.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:21:23 UTC No. 16230350
>>16230308
China is also constantly hampered by politics. The ride never ends
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:52:12 UTC No. 16230391
>>16230291
>Anita Sarkeesian
>act like cunt to Carl
>married herself
You can’t make this up
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 20:28:59 UTC No. 16230934
>>16218126
>this cope thread's still going
Starship melted and sank into the fucking sea after not making orbit. It's at the bottom of the Indian Ocean along with several gigatons of pajeet poo, where it belongs. Elon's pyramid scheme will have long run out of money before his silly meme rocket actually does anything functional. Get over it.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:37:33 UTC No. 16231120
>>16230934
>the suborbital test flight didn't make orbit!!! musk btfo!!!! hail the greasy unwashed prague pedophile!
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 00:51:53 UTC No. 16231426
>>16231120
You don't sound mad and frustrated at all.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:07:23 UTC No. 16231454
>>16230276
>while onlyfan models are raking in millions annually just for posting nudes twice every week.
99.9% of onlyfan models do not make this.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 01:42:15 UTC No. 16231509
>>16231426
cope. starship will continue to blow SLS the fuck out.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 07:06:20 UTC No. 16231980
>>16218126
acktualy according to the laws of thermodynamics it's impossible for me to be coping right now. if you watched me 15 minute video I spend two minutes doing 3 seconds of reading from Wikipedia that said I'm right.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:45:42 UTC No. 16232263
>>16218126
Today is a bad day for people suffering from Elon Derangement Syndrome
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:05:24 UTC No. 16232291
>>16232263
What is this for?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:08:00 UTC No. 16232294
>>16232291
ratification of Musks 2018 CEO compensation package and the move of Teslas legal corporate headquarters (incorporation) from Delaware into Texas
both passed
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:11:49 UTC No. 16232303
>>16218126
He’s right about Musk being a charlatan. Dude is a never ending stream of false promises and false ideals.
Thunderf00t also kinda sucks too though. He makes like 7 different videos all 30 minutes long all covering the exact same topic, and spends like 15 of those minutes showing him doing random barely related shit in his lab at work.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:16:06 UTC No. 16232313
>>16232303
>>16232191
If you track progress at SpaceX you can see where he was busy with Tesla. None of what has happened in space over the last decade would've happened without Musk
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:18:04 UTC No. 16232318
>>16232313
NASA landed a rover on mars. What has SpaceX done other than satellites and suborbital flights?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:22:15 UTC No. 16232324
>>16232313
Spacex is quite literally his only good company. When I say false promises and false ideals I’m talking about
>Boring company
>Hyperloop
>neuralink
>His criticisms of AI
>His criticisms of “free speech”
And even though Spacex is his best company he can’t even come close to meeting the expectations he wildly sets every year. Basically anytime Elon opens his fucking mouth it’s safe to assume 99% of what comes out of it is complete horse shit, and the 1% that’s true is that when he says something will be ready in 5 years he means 50 years.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:22:32 UTC No. 16232325
>>16232318
Musk was planning on landing on Mars with Falcon Heavy, but was directly threatened by senator Shelby (many such cases) so he cancelled it. Were it not for leadership within the most powerful entity on earth he would've sent something four years ago.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:24:29 UTC No. 16232326
>>16232325
I heard it was JPL that threw a shitfit over red dragon, maybe it was both knowing shelby.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:34:33 UTC No. 16232355
>>16232324
Everything he has done besides SpaceX is to make money or develop technology for Mars
>boring company
Tunnels for habitation on Mars
>hyperloop
He didn't do anything besides say he might write a paper about it but then he decided not to because he realized it was impossible, and then a bunch of other people who also knew it was impossible for together to see what problems they could solve
>neuralink
Broke some records within an hour of installation. Did you think you'd be living in Minecraft this century?
>AI
Everything he said came true. The big players in the space made racially biased AIs deliberately. We're not sure what the implications are yet
>free speech
Are you European?
Anyway the rest is just >>16218201 durr timelines which I covered in the second post in this thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:36:58 UTC No. 16232360
>>16232355
Literally nothing you said in this post is accurate.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:38:31 UTC No. 16232363
>>16232360
Sounds like seeth to me
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:41:22 UTC No. 16232369
>>16232363
>If I just lie about everything Musk has said and done then he’s the greatest man to ever live
Sorry I’m not going to invest any significant time trying to argue with a retard like you.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:42:33 UTC No. 16232374
>>16232369
Nothing he said was a lie.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:44:59 UTC No. 16232379
>>16232374
Come on man, just let him cope. Musk just got paid $50b, it's a bad day to have EDS
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:50:05 UTC No. 16232383
>>16232374
Boring company is specifically because Elon didn’t want to wait in LA traffic and it’s been an abysmal failure.
Elon Musk wrote the “white paper” on the hyperloop and sponsored several organization’s constructions of prototypes. He never said it would never work.
Neuralink hasn’t broken any records, I don’t even know what that means. Its chips are neither groundbreaking nor safe.
Elon Musk is extremely duplicitous about AI. He wants everyone to slow down AI development yet he is investing in AI development and dumping tons of money into unrestricted AI research at Tesla.
Elon Musk went on a grand crusade about free speech yet he bans virtually anyone that shit talks him specifically on X, he fires people at his own company when they voice disagreement with him, he implemented a pay system on his website so you can speak even more freely by paying.
You baited me, congratulations.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:07:02 UTC No. 16232398
>>16232383
Literally nothing you said in this post is accurate.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:18:35 UTC No. 16232415
>>16232398
Wow you owned me epic style. How does Elon’s asshole taste by the way?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:20:19 UTC No. 16232416
>>16232294
Wonder how much that judge's ruling ends up costing Delaware. I know lots of companies are incorporated there for fiscal and risk reasons so if all they're losing is some annual incorporation fees, might not be a big deal but if they're getting a slice of the Tesla pie, the move of the legal headquarters to Texas will sting a bit, especially since the shareholders just overruled the Delaware judge who invalidated Musk's compensation package.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:26:10 UTC No. 16232420
>>16232416
I think it will be disastrous, this will start an exodus of corporations out of delaware
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:27:45 UTC No. 16232423
>>16232416
What judge ruling caused this?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:41:09 UTC No. 16232438
>>16232383
Verified snopes fact checkers have confirmed that neuralink is both safe and effective
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:49:12 UTC No. 16232442
>>16230934
> flight so successful even the FAA says this flight was a success and doesn't require any investigation
you're the one coping here faggot
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 12:58:39 UTC No. 16232452
>>16232438
>hundreds of animal deaths during testing
>bugs and issues in the first human trial, ones that were literally known about
Yeah man put the Elon chip in your brain. Nothing will go wrong.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:07:01 UTC No. 16232465
>>16232452
>hundreds of animal deaths during testing
There are probably more dead animals as a result of you personally getting hungry, who cares
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:13:10 UTC No. 16232473
>>16232465
Yeah, I’m not going to sign up for the brain damage chip or being food. I didn’t think the latter needed to be said though.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:15:59 UTC No. 16232482
>>16232325
>>16232326
Doesn't matter now. Shelby is gone and his heir is a bimbo (pic related) with zero clout. The biggest obstacle for SpaceX right now is Joe Biden, who has a hate boner for Musk. If Biden (or more accurately the Biden administration) loses power, it's clear sailing for SpaceX. The Democrats in Congress might be unhappy with Musk for various reasons but they don't seem intent on throwing up roadblocks the way the Biden administration has.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:41:56 UTC No. 16232521
>>16232482
I keep hearing this but what exactly has biden done to screw over musk? it's insinuation and never specifics.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:46:36 UTC No. 16232526
>>16232521
Fcc starlink rejection, no invite/mention of Tesla at a Whitehouse EV event, "lots of luck on your trip to the moon", starship regulator impediments, etc. The admin has a lot of subtle ways of fucking with him. They can't outright do anything because of how interested the DoD is but they have an asset in Musk and they're impeding rather than helping
🗑️ Barkon. at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:49:35 UTC No. 16232530
Was this thread created just to suck musks 1 inch?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:39:45 UTC No. 16232591
>>16232526
>Fcc starlink rejection
Thats the fcc being stupid, not biden
>no invite/mention of Tesla at a Whitehouse EV event
No 100% EV manufacturer was invited cause the point of the meeting was to get legacy automakers on board with EVs
>"lots of luck on your trip to the moon"
Yeah this is just biden being an out of touch boomer
>starship regulator impediments
Thats the regulators, not biden.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:12:12 UTC No. 16232753
>>16232591
The FCC is part of the executive branch. The FAA is part of the executive branch. USFWS is part of the executive branch.
Did you sleep through fifth grade civics class? Weird how these agencies that are part of the executive branch only started micromanaging when Biden became president. As regulators, they have a role to play but no one intellectually honest can say what they've been doing while under Biden has been consistent with how they've operated in the past. But we all know you're disingenuous so your next step will be to sea lion and think that makes you clever while everyone shakes their heads at your clumsy attempts to run interference for the executive branch (you know, the branch of government headed by Joe Biden). What exactly do you think you're accomplishing with this attempt to pretend the executive branch doesn't have authority and influence over its agencies?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:30:04 UTC No. 16232799
>>16232753
>Did you sleep through fifth grade civics class?
American tries not to forget people exist outside of america challenge level impossible
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:33:30 UTC No. 16232807
>>16232799
You wish you were American; making american wages
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:37:27 UTC No. 16232819
>>16232807
I'm perfectly happy with my swiss wage
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:14:31 UTC No. 16233279
>>16232799
It's one thing to not know about XYZ, and it's another to make confident assertions about XYZ while not knowing about it.
Even not knowing how the American bureaucracy is organized, is it seriously not conceivable that the President can use connections within various government institutions to harass his political enemies?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:44:36 UTC No. 16233304
>>16232799
Then why comment on something you don't understand?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:47:38 UTC No. 16233307
>>16232442
>even the FAA says this flight was a success and doesn't require any investigation
>sank like a turd in someone else's ocean
I should hope not.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:49:28 UTC No. 16233309
>>16219422
>I think envy is also a big part of it.
The left in general is fueled by envy, that's true of essentially every issue they're concerned with.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:51:51 UTC No. 16233312
>>16231509
>starship will continue to blow SLS the fuck out
Id tell you to call me when it orbits a payload around the moon, but I don't think this thread will last until the late 2030s.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:58:41 UTC No. 16233318
>>16233312
cope. SLS costs billions per launch and is not reusable. it has no future. it's a complete waste of taxpayers' dollars designed to be built as inefficiently as possible to redistribute said taxpayers' dollars to corporations throughout the different states. at least when the government gives money to spacex it gets put to good use and is not spent in the most ridiculously inefficient manner it possibly could be, just so that congresstards can say "look, I created jobs!"
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:01:50 UTC No. 16233321
>>16232383
>Its chips are neither groundbreaking nor safe
If they're not safe then why hasn't the guy who had one implanted experienced any complications yet?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:04:12 UTC No. 16233324
>>16233312
>$35bil and 12 years development to launch 20 tons around the moon every three years
Yeah... Not even sure what to say to you
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:06:38 UTC No. 16233327
>>16233318
As long as Muskrats are celebrating controlled crashes, you better believe it has a future. Git gud, ketamine junkie.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:11:06 UTC No. 16233335
>>16233327
So far they both just end up in the ocean lol, unfortunately for you that only changes for one of them
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:11:53 UTC No. 16233339
>>16233324
How many tons has SpaceX orbited around the moon in the last three years?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:19:59 UTC No. 16233352
>>16233327
>each starship test flight is exponentially more successful than the last
>i-it totally won't ever work, SLS will still be relevant in 10 years, I promise
2 BILLION DOLLARS PER LAUNCH
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:34:01 UTC No. 16233367
>>16233352
>exponentially
It's linear af, lol. Don't exaggerate because you think it sounds cool. But it better get "exponential" real quick, if it needs TWENTY LAUNCHES to fuel up to reach the moon.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:35:43 UTC No. 16233371
>>16233367
Those 20 launches will still be cheaper than 1 SLS launch lmao
scope_man at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:51:25 UTC No. 16233393
>>16233367
>20
Are you the 40 tons faggot from /sfg/
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 22:56:46 UTC No. 16233408
>>16233371
You can put a price on an impossibility?
>>16233393
No, that would be yer dad.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 23:04:37 UTC No. 16233428
>>16221048
>while you were asleep in 2023 spacex launched 96 rockets, up from 61 in 2022. Thats 3.8 days between launches on average. Even the most damning estimates say you need 15 launches to fill the fuel depot, that's achievable before too much boil off happens. And your prize is getting over 100 tons to the moon instead of golf cart
It's also the cheapest fuel available so it will end up being cheaper than complex fuels.
>>16219142
Complexity is a non issue unlike shuttle or saturn v this will have economies of scale for leo, which means there will constantly be missions to improve efficiency.
People seem to forget than the only maximized apollo mission was 17 the rest were not using the full tech potential since they were affraid of their limits.
And the shuttle failure of heat shield design was known to be fucked up from the first mission were some tiles fell off, but once they proved it worked they were terrified about changing it and it costed two shuttles blowing up later.
Starship will be improved every month for years after operational level launches start, the level of economies of scale in low earth orbit it will open is so much that some people like Tom Mueller from spacex who designed the falcon 9 engines decided to leave to open his own companies about restartable engines for leo to high orbit punch.
Everyone with 3 digits iq and not a butthurt leftists understands that starship will open so much economies of scale that there will be empty space on launches on leo so companies will start to launch shit and test on the excess space on starship and there will be ton of business to be done about sending stuff from leo to high orbits
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 23:07:56 UTC No. 16233442
>>16225403
>but the competition is a decade or two behind them
27 years behind more or less, up until 2015 the competition reaction to falcon 9 was "we will improve the current desing to be 5% more efficient".
Then it was we will cancel some of our rockets to keep the cheapest one and lower costs.
Then people like bezos got into the scene and some chinese companies started to invest in reusability and oldspace freaked the fuck out.
Honestly they are done and most likely live on their own momentum, the fact that they have not in some cases started to develop their own reusable rockets says how retarded they truly are.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 23:09:17 UTC No. 16233445
>>16225470
More even safe and trusted conventional rockets use engines that are worse that the shit the soviets used for their lunar rocket and are simply used due to being trusted.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Jun 2024 01:42:25 UTC No. 16233698
When I was younger and into atheism I used to like some of his stuff. Decided to look him up for the first time in like 12 years and his entire account is screaming into the void about Elon Musk. Complete loser behavior.
I think it's important that even if you don't believe in God, it's important to realize that replacing it with lefty envy and scientism is a lot worse.