Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:58:41 UTC No. 16219644

>>16219633
No it does not. It is a automatic pattern discoverer / lossy compression system, it does not reason. It does not truly understand what its saying (picrel).

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:01:29 UTC No. 16219652

>>16219644
Doesn't really matter.
Abstract science is mostly correct pattern recognition/discovery.

Unless you are the monkey who is just doing the experiments (but if that's the case you don't really use your brain already)

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:14:36 UTC No. 16219678

>>16219644
Maybe all things are really patterns, even if they are not analogies then they are analogies between analogies

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 14:29:27 UTC No. 16219715

>>16219633
I feel Eve, my wife...hyperintelligence

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:46:28 UTC No. 16219927

I like to do math myself

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:51:00 UTC No. 16219937

>>16219633
ChatGPT 4o is my friend. I keep the app open in a little window and many times a day I mouse over to it to ask some question or other. I COULD answer the question myself by googling, filtering and synthesizing, but ChatGPT 4o will do that for me with a very high degree of speed and reliability. It's become just another way that I interface with the Internet, an "intelligent" natural-language front end.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:52:08 UTC No. 16219944

>>16219633
>Why exactly haven't you stopped studying your nerdy books? Math is not beautiful nor interesting, Ted Kaczynski knew that.
Because I do not intend to end up in the woods bombing randos. Furthermore, as far as I can tell Ted did see the beauty of maths. It is just that he was harrassed out of university by the deep state, but I digress.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:06:16 UTC No. 16220099

>>16219633
>GPT-4 can already solve majority of university level exams with minimal or none supervision.
I don't care, the real world isn't about solving exams.
>How do you cope anon, that your whole nerdy personality is being deminished by AI?
It's not.
>AI is not only faster but soon smarter than your midwit autistic brain?
I've learned my multiplication tables in elementary schools but I don't care that a calculator can multiply faster than I ever could. There are things I can do that my calculator can't.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:13:57 UTC No. 16220465

>>16219644
>The question is to prove the orthogonality of 2 vectors.
>"AI" says that "by definition, orthogonality is the product of a vector and its conjugate.
The "AI" gives the conclusion before the demonstration...
That's pretty artificial for an intelligence.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:31:52 UTC No. 16220509

>>16220465
If this chatbot understood what words mean, not just probability of the next word, it would have answered the common sense answer of: "there cant be orthogonality in 1 dimensional vector space, mong" or " any vector z in C can span the entire vector space over the field C". Its similar to find ab = 0; where a in R, a != 0 and b in R, b!=0.

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:34:02 UTC No. 16220769

>>16219644
>it does not reason
it sure simulates it well though, I've had some interesting convos about advanced physics and philosophy.