Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:08:40 UTC No. 16221075
>>16221072
it becomes another in that it has changed, but the history of having the parts replaced from that specific ship means that due to the history of it, its the same. because of it being changed. it has no soul to speak of, but you could picture a non soul soul for it. theres my midwit take :3
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:10:01 UTC No. 16221076
If I assign a value to x, and then assign a different value to x, is x still x? At what point does it become another variable?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:12:14 UTC No. 16221079
>>16221076
If you change x very slightly it's still x
If you increment or decrement it's still x
Any other cases must be decided by a jury of your peers
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:14:56 UTC No. 16221084
>>16221079
Wouldn't it be a jury of your piers?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:19:20 UTC No. 16221094
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:29:57 UTC No. 16221114
>>16221072
Yes. The history of the old parts is apart of the new ones. The ship is a name given to parts that helped change it's location and alter other causal lines. Replacing parts gives context to older parts and upon seeing the ship, the newest part will be as different to the oldest as the oldest was to the replacement. The sum is greater then the individuals for the act of the individual defines the sum.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 02:57:46 UTC No. 16221148
>>16221072
when the first part is replaced it stops being the same ship
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:08:36 UTC No. 16221162
>>16221148
In what way?
Should you be taxed on purchasing a second vehicle just because you replaced a spark plug.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:08:58 UTC No. 16221163
>>16221072
Ask the Niagara?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:22:12 UTC No. 16221179
>>16221072
If parts of a number are replaced by parts of a number...
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:42:50 UTC No. 16221197
>>16221072
If all matter in the universe is identical at the quantum level then at which point does air become a boat, the answer is when someone defines it as a boat, whether or not it's the same boat is irrelevant, it all boils down to subjective semantics and what each individual chooses to believe in a chosen framework, neither answer is correct
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 05:56:55 UTC No. 16221399
>>16221072
>Existence precedes essence
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:45:42 UTC No. 16221436
>>16221072
Not a matter of science. Fuck off back to >>>/his/
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:46:49 UTC No. 16221439
>>16221072
You cant replace every part of a ship. The whole proposition is stupid. This is valid for every kind of ship.
Oh, you mean as an intellectual challenge? hehe lets replace the hull and bulkheads, every one, you know, as an intellectual challenge
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:08:08 UTC No. 16221606
>>16221072
who cares. you have a ship. if you believe it's the same ship, then it is.
>but what if we took all the parts that were removed and reassemble them
then you have two ships. chose the one you think is pretty. fuck off.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:10:39 UTC No. 16221608
>>16221072
If all part in the Golden Gate Bridge were eventually replaced, would it still be the Golden Gate Bridge? Yes
Would it still be the original Golden Gate Bridge? No.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:14:49 UTC No. 16221612
When time passes are you the same person you were an instant ago?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:20:44 UTC No. 16221621
>>16221084
ha ha!
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 09:32:47 UTC No. 16221639
>>16221072
This is not science. Whether or not it's the same ship is a matter of labels. If it is referred to and understood the same, it is the same ship.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:02:45 UTC No. 16221718
>>16221072
Almost as if object permanence is a figment of your imagination.
B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:10:29 UTC No. 16221723
Slow board.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:22:20 UTC No. 16221728
>>16221072
It's the same ship until the klabautermann abandons it.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:31:52 UTC No. 16221733
objects are not real. Everything is particles which are indistinguishable, i.e quark=quark
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 11:41:35 UTC No. 16221746
>>16221639
>This is not science
I know, semantics, philosophy, call it what you wish, but OP is off-topic in /sci/
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:10:42 UTC No. 16221831
It depends on whether by "same ship" you mean the same material + same shape or only same shape.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:12:54 UTC No. 16221834
>>16221072
This is a metaphysical question.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:31:22 UTC No. 16221850
To all the posters saying this isn't a matter of science. Kurisu is nost definitely a matter of science.
>>16221072
Sex with Kurisu
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 13:55:00 UTC No. 16221880
>Is the same ship
You should never write the word is or variations of the verb to be like was or were since they represent a fiction. Nothing "is".
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 14:03:35 UTC No. 16221897
>>16221880
>Nothing "is".
So nothing is not?
So nothing is?
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 14:25:34 UTC No. 16221929
>>16221072
its the same ship
always has been
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 14:28:06 UTC No. 16221931
>>16221897
Only perception exists, to say that an object "is" means you embed it with an elementary issness that does not exist
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:17:06 UTC No. 16221995
nigga this /sci/ not tranny philosophy
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 15:41:17 UTC No. 16222086
>>16221084
CARLOS!!
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:18:00 UTC No. 16222448
This thread was moved to >>>/his/16723252