Anonymous at Sat, 8 Jun 2024 07:05:41 UTC No. 16221477

>>16221342
>Abstract
>Self-reported mate preferences suggest intelligence is valued across cultures, consistent with the idea that human intelligence evolved as a sexually selected trait. The validity of self-reports has been questioned though, so it remains unclear whether objectively assessed intelligence is indeed attractive.
>In Study 1, 88 target men had their intelligence measured and based on short video clips were rated on intelligence, funniness, physical attractiveness and mate appeal by 179 women.
>In Study 2 (N = 763), participants took part in 2 to 5 speed-dating sessions in which their intelligence was measured and they rated each other's intelligence, funniness, and mate appeal.
Rather small set, but let's carry on.
>Measured intelligence did not predict increased mate appeal in either study, whereas perceived intelligence and funniness did.
So, presentation is what's important. A dull nerd is dull. A pleasant nerd is pleasant.
>More intelligent people were perceived as more intelligent, but not as funnier.
Again, the same point.
>Results suggest that intelligence is not important for initial attraction, which raises doubts concerning the sexual selection theory of intelligence.
Well, no shit, how many want to date an uninteresting or unpleasant person, amirite?

Interesting study, but needs more looking into.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513821000453