Image not available

640x640

3322968_155051607....jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Ban all /pol/tards

Anonymous No. 16222709

/sci/ nowadays be like
>10000th thread about climate change denial
>10000th anti vax thread
>10000th thread about iq
>1000000th thread about race

Anonymous No. 16222710

>>16222709
aye aye

Anonymous No. 16222721

>>16222709
The mods will never ban the /pol/tards because they're after ad revenue.

Anonymous No. 16222737

If you're not here to read /sfg/ then I don't know what to tell you

Anonymous No. 16222759

>>16222709
Oh look, the 5th meta thread today complaining about people disagreeing with OP
>>16222721
Oh look, the exact samefag response OP posts each time he makes a variation of this thread. How original.

bodhi No. 16222764

LOL FAG

Anonymous No. 16222782

>>16222759
Do you know how this site generates revenue?

Anonymous No. 16222785

>>16222709
No this is the only science forum where you can discuss those topics. Just ban the schizos and the board is good.

Anonymous No. 16222798

I don't blame the /pol/ trolls when people keep rewarding their low-effort bait. Honestly, even if /pol/bait pulls attention from legitimate threads, the kind of people falling for the bait would've never made a good contribution in a legitimate thread anyway.

Anonymous No. 16222808

>>16222709
>10000th thread about climate change denial
>10000th anti vax thread
>10000th thread about iq
>1000000th thread about race
That's only because you don't come to the objectively true conclusions; OP is a fag.

Anonymous No. 16222838

>>16222709
This isn't reddit, fatso

Anonymous No. 16222871

>nowadays
fresh off the Redditboat?
either give a definitive proof of why those things are irrefutable or stfu nigga
>>16222721
>>16222798
post nose

Image not available

640x800

1717882065311.webm

Anonymous No. 16222888

Those people aren't /pol/tards. They are golems programmed or paid to make this board unusable. There is nothing wrong with /pol/tards in general. Some /sci/ topics are inherently /pol/ topics as well. There have always been a few /pol/ threads on /sci/ at any time. But what we are experiencing over the last months is inorganic spam. Dozens of threads about the same topics. Always lowest effort, no informational content at all. No attempts at any discussion, no engagement at all. Endlessly bumped with thoughtless one-liners. Some group seems to have a dedicated agenda to drive away users from this board by making it as boring as possible.

Anonymous No. 16222899

>>16222888
checked, and yes, this is a site-wide phenomena

Anonymous No. 16222945

>>16222798
If you don't take the bait they just jerk each other off to keep the thread bumped so they can feel like they won.

Anonymous No. 16222953

>>16222709
Fuck off fag. I don't like them either (the actual ones) but these posts are always leftard trojan horses to make the boards lame and gay.

Go back u fucking tourist.

Image not available

1000x9651

tmEdsHefB3xS.jpg

Anonymous No. 16222977

>>16222888

Anonymous No. 16223407

>>16222782
Obviously it’s by tracking our real ips and selling the data. The whole Anonymous thing is just there to fool you, ((they)) have to let you know though that’s why there is a name option when posting. I have an infograph somewhere that explains everything, lemme see if I can find it for you

Anonymous No. 16223454

>>16223407
no one wants our data and im genuinely perplex that someone is paying for constant brainrot bot posting on every board

Anonymous No. 16223460

>>16222709
Don't forget namefags. There is not a single namefag on /sci/ who isn't a schizo.

Anonymous No. 16223605

>>16222709
>two troon
What you talking about?

Anonymous No. 16223965

Sage and hide threads that you don't like
Report threads that break rules
Post actual science and math related content
Outpace the crap threads

Image not available

785x1000

1562514874678.png

Anonymous No. 16224018

>>16222709
>janny please my safe space isn't safe enough

Anonymous No. 16224031

>>16222709
If science is just about accepting experts say then why is everyone forced to go through science classes in school? Just tell them “always defer to experts” and we can save a ton of wasted time and money

Anonymous No. 16224037

>>16224018
Has /pol/ become boring or why are you shitting on other boards too?

Anonymous No. 16224041

>>16224037
He isn't from /pol/. He has only been instructed to act as annoying as possible.

Anonymous No. 16224047

>>16222709
+1

Anonymous No. 16224048

>>16222737
I'm come here just for the /sqt/

Anonymous No. 16224053

>>16224031

Anonymous No. 16224382

>>16223407
No, it's ad revenue. Whenever you click on one of those neat looking ads the site gets paid. More traffic = more clicks = more money. That's why /pol/tards are useful to the mods. They are the traffic, they are the clicks, they are the money.

Anonymous No. 16224391

>>16222709
/pol/tards aren't on here faggots. they're glowies who are paid to control the narrative.
>hey, we need to discuss whether we should put faggots who forced everyone to take an experimental vaccine to jail.
>CIA bots: spam viruses are fake, Hydro Chloroquine so good... etc.
>everyone left the thread because now it's unreadable
or
>maybe we need to reevaluate our climate change committment, maybe we need better scientific model.
>CIA bots: spam climate change arent real, made up, post useless misleading imageries...
>everyone now leave the thread because it's unreadble nonsenses.

you low IQ retards simply fall for this trick every single time.

Anonymous No. 16224396

Id you have reddit ideology, you must be killed. That's mt objective and final offer.

Marxist trannies have no place on 4chan. Go back to you troonit

Image not available

600x517

1688074805517558.jpg

Anonymous No. 16224436

>>16222709
>/pol/tards
You mean redditors?
Anyone who has reddit cookies or links in their history/bookmarks should get instantly permabanned, same with twitter

Anonymous No. 16224442

>>16224391
>they're glowies who are paid to control the narrative.
Every now and then I toy with the idea that they're fossil fuel shills testing out new strategies or refining old ones. Obviously 4chan, and especially /sci/, don't have enough traffic to make it a cost effective propaganda target, but there's high engagement and sometimes high effort put into countering these posts which could make it a useful sandbox to test things out before taking them to their actual targets.

Anonymous No. 16224459

>>16222709
Yeah, the rona fucked this place up. It brough with it an influx of /pol/tards. Same happened to /k/ in 2022.