Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:42:22 UTC No. 16223980

>>16223938
No it isn't you fucking retard.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:44:50 UTC No. 16223983

>>16223938
Congrats, did you finish first grade in elementary school?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:51:54 UTC No. 16223990

>>16223938
not in a field of characteristic 2.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:57:42 UTC No. 16223995

>>16223938
>2+3

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 07:58:51 UTC No. 16223996

>>16223995
oh i read prime not odd, mb.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 09:24:11 UTC No. 16224083

>>16223938
All odd numbers are 1 more than a multiple of 2. For example, consider [math](2m+1),(2n+1)[/math] where [math]m,n\in\mathbb{Z}[/math]

[math](2m+1)\,+\,(2n+1) \,=\,2m+2n+2\,=\,2(m+n+1)[/maths]

We can see that the result is always a multiple of 2.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 09:26:57 UTC No. 16224089

>>16223938
All odd numbers are 1 more than a multiple of 2. For example, consider [math](2m+1),(2n+1)[/math], where [math]m,n\in\mathbb{Z}[/math]:


[math](2m+1)\,+\,(2n+1) \,=\,2m+2n+2\,=\,2(m+n+1)[/math]

We can see that the result is always a multiple of 2.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 09:38:45 UTC No. 16224108

>>16223938
5.5 + 5.5 = 11

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:12:53 UTC No. 16224139

>>16224108
>these two non even numbers sum up to a non even number

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:14:44 UTC No. 16224141

>>16224108
5.5 is even

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:16:46 UTC No. 16224145

>>16224141
name one integer when multipled by 2 gives you 5.5

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:23:28 UTC No. 16224151

>>16224145
Don't talk back to me dumb faggot - you don't know math.

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:24:30 UTC No. 16224153

>>16224145
I can see with my good eye that 5.5 is even, decimals require a good eye for number.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:27:22 UTC No. 16224155

>>16224089
Or just simply a multiple of two plus a multiple of two plus 1 + 1 = even

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:27:41 UTC No. 16224156

>>16224153
So 5 is odd, but 5 and a half is not even? Hmmm. You academians are so stupid.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:28:50 UTC No. 16224157

>>16223938
This thread will reach max replies.

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:31:41 UTC No. 16224166

>>16224157
LOL THE ACADEMIANS THINK DECIMAL NUMBERS ARE JUST ATTACHED INTEGERS. Go to a real school faggots. Try my school.

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:32:43 UTC No. 16224168

>>16224166

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:34:32 UTC No. 16224171

>>16223938
yes, that's because any odd number is always a multiple of the number 2 + 1, and so when adding them together, the 1s one each of them add into yet another 2.

B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:35:44 UTC No. 16224174

>>16224171
>number 2+1

It equals 3 faggit
Just say 3

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:38:32 UTC No. 16224177

>>16223938
Yeah? Formally prove that assertion.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:56:11 UTC No. 16224200

>>16224177
product of two odd numbers is even
(2n+1)(2m+1)=4nm+2n+2m+1=2(2nm+n+m)+1
set k = 2nm+n+m
then (2n+1)(2m+1)=2k
qed

sum of two odd numbers is even
(2n+1)+(2m+1)=2n+2m+2=2(n+m+1)
let k' = n+m+1
then (2n+1)+(2m+1)=2k'
qed

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:42:34 UTC No. 16224241

>>16223938
17+115

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:44:33 UTC No. 16224243

>>16224241
what the fuck

🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:30:20 UTC No. 16224275

Fair is square is what you are up against. You commit high crimes that you have to pay at death and you moan you don't care about the punishment when you will. I advise that you stop these crimes. You should revert to fair is square.

🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:33:01 UTC No. 16224278

You can be forgiven for those.

Plus we can make peace and go far.

Your fair loss annoys you. You need to forget.

🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:36:02 UTC No. 16224280

You would be treated as my population, I would help you all receive the gift of wealth and the gift of intelligence with fine schooling and governance. Together, we would be the best everywhere under my wisdom and your future selves.

That's what I offer, and I don't lie.

🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:38:27 UTC No. 16224285

You will equal me. If you can put aside your petty revenge for your fair loss in competitive circumstance, we would prosper. I do have love for you but you are aggravating me.

🗑️ B4RK0N (300 IQ) 'kneel' at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 12:40:39 UTC No. 16224288

Think carefully:

A. your high crimes that are punishable by death and numbers(not me).
B. Our peace.

There may be a way to get around both

What's the point of aggression for revenge of fair loss just to proud at someone's hell. I offer prosperity. And a swift end to this condition.

I show my care for you here

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 13:40:00 UTC No. 16224388

>>16223938
Welcome to integer parity.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 13:47:36 UTC No. 16224397

>>16224145
thrembo

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:02:44 UTC No. 16224990

>>16224241
Are you on crack?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:04:41 UTC No. 16224995

>>16223938
This is a top post on /sci/...

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:13:41 UTC No. 16225030

>>16224995
The competency crisis is real.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 01:31:51 UTC No. 16225953

>>16223938
simple
odd=even+1
odd+odd=even+even+1+1=even+even+2=even+even+even=even

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 02:58:45 UTC No. 16226080

>>16223980
Proof?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:00:01 UTC No. 16226082

>>16224145
5.
5.*2 = 5.5

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:11:53 UTC No. 16226100

Best thread in sci rn fr

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 03:12:30 UTC No. 16226101

>>16224089
This occurred to me as I read the OP and damn does it taste good

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:24:41 UTC No. 16226205

>>16224275
>>16224278
>>16224280
>>16224285
>>16224288
are you ok bro

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 05:27:34 UTC No. 16226207

>>16223938
-1 is an odd number
-3 is an odd number

-1 + (-3) = -4 is a negative number

>??????

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 06:09:41 UTC No. 16226280

>>16224200

I can see something wrong with your first proof, can't you?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:14:57 UTC No. 16226350

>>16225953
/thread

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:22:24 UTC No. 16226364

Counter example

-1 + 1 = 0

-1 and 1 are both odd

0 is neither odd nor even

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:28:59 UTC No. 16226370

>>16226364
>0 is neither odd nor even
who's going to tell him?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:29:32 UTC No. 16226373

>>16226364
Zero is even.
0x2 = 0
You are correct that zero is not odd, since
0 != 2n + 1 for any integer n.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:33:08 UTC No. 16226374

>>16226373
>0x2=0
That's not what even means. Even means it can be divided by 2. You just multiplied by 2. That's not the same.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:37:35 UTC No. 16226379

>>16226374
I'm sorry, but you are an incorrigible idiot.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:44:42 UTC No. 16226633

>>16223938
It's over. You can use this method to reanalyse primes... It's time anon. The coefficients are calling.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:46:32 UTC No. 16226636

>>16226633
No. That's not possible. IT CAN'T BE POSSIBLE!

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:48:34 UTC No. 16226637

>>16226636
That is the dark secret of primes anon. All halves, are whole halves. P is equal to NP.
https://youtu.be/mwtaM0GC-js

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:50:43 UTC No. 16226640

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:51:51 UTC No. 16226642

>>16226637
I'm literally killing myself if this turns out to be possible.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:53:06 UTC No. 16226643

>>16226642
Based suicide autist.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:04:40 UTC No. 16226649

>>16223938
that's why even number are boring, dividing by 2 is quick and easy, and if you can't do that no more you have an odd number

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:09:19 UTC No. 16227046

>>16223938
Don't worry, an odd number times an odd number is always odd.
Let [math] m,n [/math] be odd integers. By the definition of odd parity, there exist some integers [math] j,k [/math] such that the equalities [math] m = 2j + 1 [/math] and [math] n = 2k + 1 [/math] are satisfied.
Let [math] z = mn [/math], and from the closure of the integers under multiplication we see that [math] z \in \Z [/math]. Through application of the laws of arithmetic, we see that [math] z = (2j + 1)(2k + 1) = 4jk + 2j + 2k + 1 = 2(2jk + j + k) + 1 [/math]. Clearly [math] (2jk + j + k) \in \Z [/math] and by the definition of odd parity we conclude that [math] z = mn [/math] is odd.

Cult of Passion at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:18:50 UTC No. 16227165

>>16223938
Odd numbers multiplied are ALWAYS odd.
>plus
Pozzed. Thats why.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:00:06 UTC No. 16228069

>>16224174
>an odd number plus an odd number is always even
Thought not specified it's a good assumption he is talking about ℕ only. No two odd numbers in ℕ add up to 3.

>faggit
get that cock out of your mind