Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:23:23 UTC No. 16224465

they will never be achieved because qm is incorrect.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:28:27 UTC No. 16224470

>>16224460
Quantum computers were invented in 1998

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:55:58 UTC No. 16224513

Does Michio know what he’s talking about in terms of quantum computers. He’s a retard in every other aspect.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 14:56:46 UTC No. 16224516

>>16224460
Its fun to say Quantum.
Fundamentally speaking, how is Quantum Computing different than the latest "standard" computer?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 15:11:50 UTC No. 16224543

>>16224460
Aren't Google,IBM and other companies constantly developing it or is it just another disinformation?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:24:13 UTC No. 16224758

>>16224460
20 years ago the Quantum Computer Craze was just like AI is now. It was supposed to up end civilization and crack all the encryption and steal all the Bitcoin and the Q-puter would even rape your wife while the dog watches....but it never happened. Bitcoin is still fucking your lunch like a street walking whore and Q-puters can't do shit about it. Why isn't AGI already running on Q-puters? It's like every decade we get a new fucking bullshit monorail project to scream about and nothing ever fucking happens.

That's what I think of your stupid stink ass Q-puter. Wake me up when it hacks Satoshi's 1 million strong BTC wallet and moves it. Spoiler...it won't.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:32:05 UTC No. 16224774

>>16224516
>Fundamentally speaking, how is Quantum Computing different than the latest "standard" computer?
The size of the switch that does the calculations. Modern computer science has reached a plateau on chip size and it's become very difficult to make minor advancements on processor speeds with current technological understanding on how computers are built.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing
Despite high hopes for quantum computing, significant progress in hardware, and optimism about future applications, a 2023 Nature spotlight article summarised current quantum computers as being "For now, [good for] absolutely nothing".[95] The article elaborated that quantum computers are yet to be more useful or efficient than conventional computers in any case, though it also argued that in the long term such computers are likely to be useful. A 2023 Communications of the ACM article[96] found that current quantum computing algorithms are "insufficient for practical quantum advantage without significant improvements across the software/hardware stack". It argues that the most promising candidates for achieving speedup with quantum computers are "small-data problems", for example in chemistry and materials science. However, the article also concludes that a large range of the potential applications it considered, such as machine learning, "will not achieve quantum advantage with current quantum algorithms in the foreseeable future", and it identified I/O constraints that make speedup unlikely for "big data problems, unstructured linear systems, and database search based on Grover's algorithm".

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:33:50 UTC No. 16224777

>>16224516
Quantum computers allow certain problems to be solved faster. For example the class of hidden subgroup problems which includes cracking RSA. On a classical computer this is considered an NP-intermediate problem with no known polynomial time algorithm but Peter Shor's algorithm provides a BQP solution.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:48:50 UTC No. 16224808

>>16224777
>Quantum computers allow certain problems to be solved faster.
Maybe.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:50:02 UTC No. 16224810

>>16224758
There was no bitcoin 20y ago

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:01:48 UTC No. 16224835

>>16224810
Okay, 15 years ago

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:17:29 UTC No. 16225040

>>16224460
They're here and they suck

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:44:25 UTC No. 16225094

>>16224460
Considering it relies on individual atoms instead of circuits to do calculations which are anything but rudimentary, might be a ways off before anything viable is created.
>>16224470
>Quantum computers were invented in 1998
Can it run Doom?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 18:50:40 UTC No. 16225107

>>16224543
The even bigger question is, what have they accomplished so far?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Jun 2024 21:04:25 UTC No. 16225370

>>16224516
i am pretty sure the current quantum computing models are just turing machines, just faster and with different operations at the instruction level, you could run your normal windows desktop on one of them, in theory.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 02:13:23 UTC No. 16226016

>>16224758
>Wake me up when it hacks Satoshi's 1 million strong BTC wallet and moves it. Spoiler...it won't.

You sweet, naive young thing:
>June 9, 2021
>On Monday, the Justice Department announced it had traced 63.7 of the 75 Bitcoins — some $2.3 million of the $4.3 million — that Colonial Pipeline had paid to the hackers as the ransomware attack shut down the company’s computer systems, prompting fuel shortages and a spike in gasoline prices. Officials have since declined to provide more details about how exactly they recouped the Bitcoin, which has fluctuated in value.
>Officials have since declined to provide more details about how exactly they recouped the Bitcoin
>https://archive.is/RkCgT

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 06:05:17 UTC No. 16226270

>>16224460
>How far are we from the invention of quantum computers?
A few years back.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 08:26:42 UTC No. 16226416

>>16225370
No, you couldn't, and you wouldn't want to. Quantum computers are probabilistic. All modern software, with the exception of software that relies on randomness (such as simulation software), requires deterministic hardware to run properly. Quantum computers will be of most use to scientists and engineers, not people running software you can buy in a retail store.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Jun 2024 09:13:50 UTC No. 16226470

>>16224460
>Michio Kaku, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and comedians Jordan Klepper and Tiffany Haddish
this will be a great scientific video!