Image not available

895x579

vonSoyman.jpg

๐Ÿงต /mg/ - math general

Anonymous No. 16234484

/mg/

talk math

formerly >>16187402

Anonymous No. 16234488

Fuck math

Image not available

721x720

Cobson.png

Anonymous No. 16234564

math will always be a gem

Anonymous No. 16234710

You can't even prove 3n+1 lol
Math is a joke

Anonymous No. 16234715

Why make this one when the other is so far from the bump limit?

New Barkon No. 16234720

>>16234564
He loves you

New Barkon No. 16234725

>>16234564
Put a gem on my tongue will you

Anonymous No. 16234726

Rank the following majors at the bachelor's level from least-intensive (math wise) to most intensive:
Aerospace, Electrical, Mechanical, Computer

Anonymous No. 16234741

>>16234726
Electrical is the most math intensive, followed by either Mechanical or Aerospace (depending on the program). Computer engineering it really depends on how the bachelor's degree is focused. If it's very practical and hardware oriented there will probably be barely any math at all except for what is needed for basic circuits, digital integrated circuits and digital logic (and maybe some algorithms/TOC if you're at a good school). If it's more of a theoretical comp E program you might get a decent amount of abstract algebra for cyber security, coding theory that kind of thing.

Anonymous No. 16235569

Bumping to save this aryan thread

Anonymous No. 16235571

>>16235569
I'm happy to claim Von Neumann, but you have to see early life.

Anonymous No. 16236312

>>16235571
then check his final moments

Anonymous No. 16236361

I'm learning about functional calculus right now and this is honestly the coolest thing I've seen in a long time, plus you can troll mathlets by leaving multiplicative integrals on the blackboard.

Image not available

1920x1080

cover5.jpg

Anonymous No. 16236739

I just finished Stewart's Calculus on my own, now time for linear algebra. Bought Friedberg, Insel and Spence's book. Comes in on Monday.

Anonymous No. 16236742

>>16236361
>>16236739
Don't bump this thread, retards, go here >>16187402

Anonymous No. 16236876

>>16236742
You mean the one that's about to hit the bump limit?

Anonymous No. 16236883

>>16236876
yeah, about
as in, it hasn't yet
Or do you abandon every thread a couple dozen posts early because, well, it'll hit the bump limit if you don't?

Anonymous No. 16236884

>>16236876
It's about 30 posts away from the bump limit. On /sci/ that's like 2 weeks' worth of posts

Anonymous No. 16236886

>>16236876
Bump limit is 320 posts. This thread OP is a fucking idiot or a troll.

Anonymous No. 16237017

how feasible is mental visualization of higher math ? how to have math based dreams when i am sleeping ?

Anonymous No. 16237026

>if, let, or suppose
nice rigurosity

Anonymous No. 16237185

>>16234484
What if we are not looking at multiplication correctly.

Anonymous No. 16237186

>>16237017
Get married and dream of financial subtraction

Anonymous No. 16237390

So I dropped out of my math masters 8 years ago because my love of alcohol superseded all else. I went down a dark spiral and wound up homeless, unemployed, etc and wound up in treatment and sober for 1 year now.

Anyway, I'm back at uni taking a few 4th year math classes to prepare for applying for my masters again. Math just seems easier than ever before somehow. I'm doing way better in my classes, getting A- to A+ on any assignment or exam. I'm even getting above 100% in this summer class because the undergrad section of this class can do the grad section problems for bonus marks.

I really wish I never wasted so much time being an alcoholic. It fucking sucks to be basically restarting at 34. I will be late 30s when I am finishing up my PhD. I always knew I had a talent for mathematics, but this shit is easy as fuck with minimal effort if I am sober. Granted, I have not taken any proof intensive courses yet though I plan to take topology next semester.

Not sure what this post is for.

Anonymous No. 16237499

>>16237017
>>16237026
>>16237185
>>16237186
>>16237390
Here retards: >>16187402

Anonymous No. 16237501

Are quaternions based

Anonymous No. 16237613

>>16237501
Quaternions are based, but other Clifford algebras are even baseder. Split-complex numbers, dual numbers, split quaternions, biquaternions - they are so heckin geometric, it's just skibidi fanum tax.

Anonymous No. 16237618

>>16237499
I posted in that one but nobody answered me >>16237052

pls respond

Anonymous No. 16237622

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsy4bPJOGME