Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:42:15 UTC No. 16236969

>>16236962
its probably true that he doesn't believe in those things, so yeah he's right.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Jun 2024 22:45:49 UTC No. 16236972

>literal who posts a retarded opinion on X

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:30:20 UTC No. 16237076

>>16236969
but are his beliefs correct?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 00:32:32 UTC No. 16237080

>>16236962
Uh, no. That's all retarded.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:13:12 UTC No. 16237139

>>16237076
no, but it is true that he believes them to be

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:16:38 UTC No. 16237144

>>16237076
yes

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:20:48 UTC No. 16237152

>>16237076
no

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 01:33:41 UTC No. 16237167

>>16236962
He's just mad that he was filtered. Unless he can show evidence for why he believes what he does and why this is more correct than what is currently accepted, he is just a retard. Simply believing whatever you are told is true for no reason is stupid, but rejecting everything to feel smarter and say "I'm not a retard who can't do math, I just choose not to believe in what you say!" is just as stupid.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:14:56 UTC No. 16237376

dark matter isn't real

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 08:02:40 UTC No. 16237513

>>16236962
no

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:33:15 UTC No. 16237826

>>16236962
aether is gemmed and even the physicists are trying to bring it back with the dark energy thing.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:06:13 UTC No. 16237934

>>16236962
Why doesn't he believe in these things?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:16:11 UTC No. 16237946

>>16237376
The evidence for its existence is overwhelming. Why is it so hard to accept there's a type of matter that cannot be seen?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:18:58 UTC No. 16237949

>>16237376
Matter is anything that has mass and volume.
>>16237946
He thinks language has to stick to its traditional meanings.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:22:01 UTC No. 16237951

>>16237949
what has mass but no volume

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:25:58 UTC No. 16237960

>>16237949
>Matter is anything that has mass and volume.
Electrons have mass but no volume.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:32:35 UTC No. 16237968

>>16237951
>>16237960
Point particles are idealizations. Further,
>In quantum mechanics, the concept of a point particle is complicated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, because even an elementary particle, with no internal structure, occupies a nonzero volume. For example, the atomic orbit of an electron in the hydrogen atom occupies a volume of ~10−30 m3.
>Elementary particles are sometimes called "point particles" in reference to their lack of internal structure, but this is in a different sense than lacking spatial extension.
>Even if an elementary particle has a delocalized wavepacket, the wavepacket can be represented as a quantum superposition of quantum states wherein the particle is exactly localized. Moreover, the interactions of the particle can be represented as a superposition of interactions of individual states which are localized. It is in this sense that physicists can discuss the intrinsic "size" of a particle: The size of its internal structure, not the size of its wavepacket. The "size" of an elementary particle, in this sense, is exactly zero.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 16:33:59 UTC No. 16237971

>>16237960
Electrons have a volume though. The volume is zero.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 21:58:22 UTC No. 16238456

>>16236972

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 22:01:42 UTC No. 16238461

>>16238456
I posted the chud because I identify with the chud meme.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:07:43 UTC No. 16238664

>tao lin going schizo
kino..

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:09:24 UTC No. 16238670

Why does Tao's blog have a huge thotty banner?

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 00:52:25 UTC No. 16238708

Note: this is not Terrence Tao the famous mathematician. It might be Tao Lin, the much-less-but-still-somewhat famous /lit/ autist. He appears to have an article on this site
>https://www.documentjournal.com/2022/01/new-cosmologies-could-reconsidering-the-big-bang-theory-save-us/
The site looks weird and possibly fake.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:01:21 UTC No. 16239149

>>16237076
it doesn't fucking matter that he believes it, this is just how shit really is dude

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:14:53 UTC No. 16239154

>>16237826
i used to think ether was a meme but gunbusters references it and its considered the most scientifically accurate super robot anime

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:15:35 UTC No. 16239156

tf