Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:19:29 UTC No. 16237380

>>16237378
we can.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 06:02:33 UTC No. 16237424

>>16237378
QE only works as instantaneous synchronizer, you can know the state of a particle without delay regardless the distance.
ie. you could know if a variant of the Schrodinger's cat is alive (as long as you previously know about the experiment).

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:26:04 UTC No. 16237815

>>16237380
Lies

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:03:40 UTC No. 16238057

>>16237378
We live in a simulation and the speed of light, which is also the speed of information, is actually the clock speed of the processor the simulation is running on. You can't overclock it. The limit is the limit is the limit.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:09:30 UTC No. 16238069

>>16238057
Get off /sci/ and go back to /x/.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 19:32:50 UTC No. 16238169

schizophasia thread
everyone spout out all your memorized polysyllabic jargon and soiyence catchphrases so you can pretend that you're soiyence wizard geniuses just like in your favorite hollywood movies
>muh IQ omg!!!
>it feels sooo big!!!
>i'm gonnnnaaaa quantuuuuuuuuummmm!!!!!!

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:30:03 UTC No. 16238743

>>16238169
N

Sage at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:43:29 UTC No. 16238760

>>16237378
Because if you knew what you were sending before you separated the entangled particles, they wouldn't be entangled anymore. If you kept them entangled, you would only know that the other particle is somewhere else and that it is the other particle.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 17 Jun 2024 01:44:30 UTC No. 16238761

>>16238760
Didn't sage, forgot to clear name field