🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:17:35 UTC No. 16240400
Quantum mechanics cannot be calculated by a classical computer.
Your mind is the perception of your brain, which is a classical computer.
Thus, whatever it is, if you can imagine it, then it's not quantum mechanics.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:25:46 UTC No. 16240409
A God is something I can imagine. Because I can imagine him, he's not a part of quantum physics, so there is definitely something that overpowers him. So whatever god is, I can still imagine him, so at least that much of god must not exist in quantum mechanics and if some part of him cannot exist then it's neither whole nor impervious to injury so even a god I could imagine could not be that. God makes no sense. Quantum mechanics wins again and I'll never even be able to imagine what it is. Checkmate, sometheist.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:30:52 UTC No. 16240418
>>16240409
Every part of this universe interacts on the quantum level. You have to interact on the quantum level to even be here. God can be imagined. Therefore it's not quantum mechanics and thus, cannot exist in this universe, as having quantum mechanical interactions is necessary. If it's able to interact in a quantum world, which it can't because I can imagine it then it does not exist. Not in this universe and not in any other universe where he could get here. God is not quantum mechanics. It cannot exist.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:38:33 UTC No. 16240431
"You can't imagine his powers!"
But I can still imagine him. Her. It. God. In this universe I can only show something exists if it interacts in accordance with relativity, classical physics and quantum mechanics. If I can imagine that God could have the power to summon power I can't imagine, I can still imagine him doing it. So whatever you think it is, it is not. Not that it does not exist it is that it cannot exist.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:42:07 UTC No. 16240434
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:44:51 UTC No. 16240436
>>16240434
That's how we cheat the system, boys. Pretend the mind has something like a speed limit, or set directions. If there are numbers in the brain, then there's a lot, lot more than one of those numbers.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:47:17 UTC No. 16240440
>>16240409
The Weak Anthropic Principle goes halfway toward an answer by applying a probabilistic selection function: “the relationship has been logically selected by the fact that only certain kinds of universe can accommodate acts of observation and an observer like the questioner.” This is right as far as it goes, but omits the generative, pre-selective phase of the explanation … the part that accounts for the selection function and the domain to which it is applied. In this respect, the WAP is a bit like natural selection; it weeds the garden well enough, but is helpless to grow a single flower.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:49:41 UTC No. 16240442
>>16240440
I didn't get it at all until that last bit about weeding for no flowers. That's poetic as fukin' Hell.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:49:52 UTC No. 16240443
>omg, my brain, it feels so big!!!
>its full of so much schizo kike jargon and fancy basedence polysyllables
>oh no
>i can't hold it in any longer
>i'm…
>i'm gonna…
>i'm gonna QUANTUUUUUUUUMMMMMM!!!!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 02:51:17 UTC No. 16240446
>>16240443
Almost me right now.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:45:43 UTC No. 16241659
It's fun to say Quantum?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:13:48 UTC No. 16241698
>>16240400
>which is a classical computer
Didn't they discover that Penrose's was right about microtubules recently?