Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:46:03 UTC No. 16240691

>>16240675
>Unironically how the hell did two bicycle shop owners manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?
they were the only ones insane enough to try probably although or something

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 07:52:10 UTC No. 16240694

>>16240675
>Unironically how the hell did two bicycle shop owners manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?
The knowledge on flight technology was published in technical books which could be purchased, and if you were very much into flying, you'd find the right community and the knowledge would get passed on, like with any other technical interests.
They weren't the only ones trying, others were as well and, if I'm not mistaken, there was a european who almost beat them

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:58:21 UTC No. 16240744

>>16240675
Bicycles were as new as cellphones.

They got their hands at a dural alloy early on.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:59:22 UTC No. 16240745

>>16240675
Bicycles were as new as cellphones.

They got their hands on a dural alloy early on.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:09:41 UTC No. 16240754

>>16240675
>is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
Depending on what you're trying to achieve, you're not going to prove the existence of quarks in your backyard

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:22:47 UTC No. 16240770

>>16240691
>they were the only ones insane enough to try probably although or something
Wrong, there was a substantial government project around the same time led by Samuel Langley. He spent the equivalent of millions of tax dollars to build a series of large planes that instantly crashed without sustaining controlled flight, in one case severely injuring his test pilot. The government tried to insist for decades afterward that Langley, rather than the Wright brothers, was the inventor of the first airplane.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:41:14 UTC No. 16240992

>>16240675
Governments don't actually produce anything. This is a common myth.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:50:03 UTC No. 16241665

>>16240675
The professional scientists of the Smithsonian Institute spent tens of millions of dollars in tax funds working on the heavier than air flight problem during the late 1800s and they got absolutely nowhere on it.
The man in charge of the program was Samuel Langley, a nepo-baby with family government connections. When the Wright brothers pulled off their trick in December of 1903, Langley promptly committed suicide by alcohol (he died in 1905), but not before organizing his fellow politically connected nepo-babys in the press to deny the Wrights' achievement, it wasn't until 1908 that the press admitted that uneducated children of a Christian religious man who learned almost everything they knew from The Bible had invented the airplane.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:25:58 UTC No. 16241714

>>16240754
Well if you find someone crazy and committed enough, you could be just as capable as the big leagues. Don’t act like the Wright Bros did their shit on a hobby budget and didn’t sink most of their life saving and time into their work.

Now that I’m think about it, I wanna see some crazy guy build his own particle accelerator on his own Nevada ranch or something lol.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:45:34 UTC No. 16241743

>>16240675
>Second question, is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
you can be whatever you want elon musk was self taught

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:49:22 UTC No. 16241746

>>16240675
I would FUCKING love to do experiments. However I got to pay bills cause shits fucking expensive. Throw in a wife and kids and I don’t even have time to think.

DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:50:46 UTC No. 16241749

>>16240675
>before any major government or academic scientist?
why would they accomplish it first?

DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:52:36 UTC No. 16241754

>>16241743
>elon musk
he does not invent, he buys

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:57:25 UTC No. 16241760

>>16240770
Langley's design was shit. It didn't even have control mechanisms other than the pilot shifting his body weight. The Wrights invented three-axis control. If his last prototype had actually managed to sustain flight the pilot probably would have died anyway because there was no way for him to control the landing.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:06:43 UTC No. 16241776

>>16241749
Money and expertise, should have been a fleeting head start

DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:17:46 UTC No. 16241793

>>16241776
>expertise
from the modern government?
lol, you will be more likely to find nepotism
listen, rulers and governors only provide culture. they give the money to artist to spread their taste
No one would have heard of Da Vinci if not for them
Because this is a question taste, how can they know anything about expertise or GOOD EXPERTS? they could hire a some mid engineer/architect/etc for all we know. They could also hire some retard due to nepotism.
you can go right now and research government's experts, and you will find many duds among the experts
this is all common sense

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:19:14 UTC No. 16241799

>>16241746
>Both Wilbur and Orville were lifelong bachelors. Wilbur once quipped that he "did not have time for both a wife and an airplane”.

Well it seems you FUCKING LOVE to shag your wife unprotected more than you love to experiment. These guys didn’t let one bitch get in their way

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:22:47 UTC No. 16241805

>>16241799
>Wilbur once quipped that he "did not have time for both a wife and an airplane”.
As a former airplane owner I can sympathize with this sentiment. I tried teaching my wife to fly, but she refused to fly solo so she could never get a license.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:43:18 UTC No. 16241827

>>16240675
>Second question, is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?

No, but they get murdered or commit suicide pretty quickly if they find something amazing.

Guy who invented that hydrogen powered car that was fueled by water just mysteriously died a few days after spooks came to his house.

And don't forget what they did to Rudolf Diesel.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:04:53 UTC No. 16241872

>>16241760
Isn’t that why they subcontract out to skunkworks???

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:49:58 UTC No. 16241939

Wilbur was full autismo and built his own wind tunnel, powered by Orville pedaling a bike. He then used this to evaluate all known aerodynamics and found major flaws with the existing theory.
Additionally, he alone had the idea of a banking turn, perhaps aided by his familiarity with bicycles. This was the breakthrough. All other experimenters were terrified of departing from absolutely level flight, and tried to steer only with the rudder.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:51:56 UTC No. 16241941

>>16241743
>elon musk was self taught
What? He went to good schools. How do you think he was admitted into the Stanford PhD program?

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:56:21 UTC No. 16241946

>>16240770
>Wrong, there was a substantial government project around the same time led by Samuel Langley
And it was dog shit. The wings are far too short and it doesn't even have a tail. The Wright glider of 1902 actually looks like a plane, with long narrow wings.
It wasn't the government insisting that it worked, but rather Glenn Curtiss, a rival of the Wrights, who knowingly modified the Langley shitmobile as part of his ongoing patent war with the Wrights

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 01:03:43 UTC No. 16241956

>>16240675
>how do people specializing in lightweight aerodynamic speed machines make a lightweight aerodynamic speed machine???
There were plenty of people attempting to make a plane, and some purportedly managed to do it independently at a similar time.
Also the age of the government pouring money into new technology feels kind of recent. Or at least if there was a new bayonet affixing device it was in the hands of ordinary soldiers relatively quickly.
>Second question, is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
https://wiki.installgentoo.com/wiki/Stagnation

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 01:41:13 UTC No. 16241991

>>16240675
1) Jew funding and CIA time travellers seeding technologies.
2) Garage geniuses always pop up when Jews fund the CIA Time Corp to seed a new technology.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:18:25 UTC No. 16242020

>>16241991
Why is it always da jooos?? If da jooos are so powerful as you make them out to be, is that an admission of inferiority?


Da jooos live in your average 4chans users head rent free.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:20:45 UTC No. 16242024

>>16242020
Is a living organism inferior to HIV? What has HIV invented? How many symphonies has it written? Has stepped foot on the moon? Does the power to rob something of its life mean its inherently inferior?

Let rattle around in your empty little reddit head for a while.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:22:49 UTC No. 16242026

>>16242020
If only you knew how bad it really was

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:27:59 UTC No. 16242028

>>16240675
The backyard scientist (and effective people in general) are a dying breed because they aren't having kids.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:40:53 UTC No. 16242034

>>16242024
What have you invented? How many symphonies have you written? Have you stepped foot on the moon?
Just because you happen to have the same skin color as the people who DID do those things, doesn't mean you get to take credit for them.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:44:04 UTC No. 16242037

>>16242034
Nice try, but I know your tricks. No changing the subject Abe, answer the question.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:45:03 UTC No. 16242038

>>16242034
Dont engage anon, at best this is bait and at worst your speaking to someone who's mentally challenged

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:48:15 UTC No. 16242043

>>16242034
Pride in one's community is what encourages people to be better and aim for lofty heights. Without it the only people working for these positions will be nepo-babies and power fetishists

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:48:25 UTC No. 16242044

>>16242038
>>16242034
lolsamefag

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:50:35 UTC No. 16242050

>>16242038
Fair point.
>>16242043
We all know the people who seething about Jews on 4chan will never work for anything or reach any heights higher than the top step of their mom's basement stairway (so they can yell at her to hurry up with the hot pockets you stupid bitch).

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 02:51:30 UTC No. 16242052

>>16242050
this post was written by someone with deep-seated personal issues

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:04:51 UTC No. 16242072

>>16242020
Jews literally live everywhere rent free.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:05:48 UTC No. 16242074

>>16242072
that's because they own the buildings kek, why do you think landlords are universally hated?

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:16:26 UTC No. 16242090

>>16242020
>complaining about jews
anon everyone knows the jews are in cahoots
>not pointing out TIME TRAVEL

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:18:20 UTC No. 16242097

>>16242074
Thank you, Prof. Explainer, MPH, MD, PhD.
I have never understood the "Jewish Landlord" meme joke before now.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:19:33 UTC No. 16242101

>>16242090
it's because he's jewish and it upsets him when he is called out

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:26:16 UTC No. 16242107

>>16241991
>Garage geniuses always pop up when Jews fund the CIA Time Corp to seed a new technology.
Find out who owns all the Apple stock. And commercial leasing in Cupertino, CA.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 03:52:01 UTC No. 16242131

>>16240745
>Bicycles were as new as cellphones
Huh? No way is that possible. Bicycles must date back to the 18th century at least

🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 04:30:19 UTC No. 16242170

>>16242131
It seems surprising, but it is so.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 04:32:25 UTC No. 16242172

>>16240675

because, at the time, there was no formal government support for industrial engineering

OP, the world was different before WW1.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 04:44:12 UTC No. 16242179

>>16240675
They weren't the only ones trying, it is still debated on who accomplished it first between inventors from these 3:
>USA
>France
>Brazil

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 05:05:05 UTC No. 16242203

Australian aboriginals invented flight several thousand years ago. They got bored of it and basically turned it into toys, like boomerangs. They often find ancient aircraft in the deserts of Australia alongside Egyptian hieroglyphs and other "Out of place" objects.

As usual, white people completely ignore this history because it doesn't adhere to their Western Canon ideals. Instead we have to listen to these retarded seppos sperging about some irrelevant nobodies who weren't even the first. Straight up moonlanding or Christopher Columbus shit.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 05:08:47 UTC No. 16242209

>>16242203
didn't know they had internet on the abbo reserves. Gas must be really taking you to the dreamtime, eh?

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 05:15:45 UTC No. 16242221

>>16242037
> Nice try, but I know your tricks. No changing the subject Abe, answer the question.

We are witnessing mental health problems on full display folks.

drink some vitamin c and get some rest. The high will wear off soon.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 10:37:03 UTC No. 16242425

>>16240675
I wonder what it'd be like to invent planes and live long enough to see Enola Gay drop the bomb.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 11:08:50 UTC No. 16242456

>>16241946
>curtiss
Its funny how organization like smithsonian has to find another bikeshop owner against them.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:08:12 UTC No. 16242798

>>16240675
>Unironically how the hell did two bicycle shop owners manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?
Skill issue

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:15:36 UTC No. 16243654

>>16240675
>Second question, is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
Given how little the Wrights benefited from their invention, why would any backyard independent scientist ever bother sharing their inventions with the rest of the world rather than just keep it for themselves?

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:24:30 UTC No. 16243660

>>16241714
>Well if you find someone crazy and committed enough, you could be just as capable as the big leagues.
It's not so much about capability more than it is about shit being expensive, you can be commited to building a large hadron collider but you'll never have the money or permission to build one

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 05:54:53 UTC No. 16243681

>>16240675
Capitalism creates incentive for inventing. Government workers are also known for being useless twats. And I tend to doubt academia was really much better during their time than it is today; I'm sure it was better, but probably not by much.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:23:00 UTC No. 16243829

>>16240675
Because Wilbur Wright was a genius.
As other posters have said, he invented the idea of banking to turn. He even had a patent for it.
He started from first principles and worked out how to fly. He was the very first real pilot in history, and he had no trainer other than himself. His guiding principle was that the plane should be unstable, so that the pilot has absolute control, rather than being trapped by the plane's aerodynamics. Later pilots experimenting with Flyer replicas said it was the most unstable plane they had ever flown, but Wilbur made it work.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:38:43 UTC No. 16243882

>>16243654
It isn't about money.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:15:29 UTC No. 16244063

>>16240675
Glowies Probably

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:19:43 UTC No. 16245260

>>16243882
How would you know? You've never invented anything useful and if you did, you'd expect to be rewarded for doing so.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:19:46 UTC No. 16245310

>>16240770
>>16240992
Market entrepreneur vs political entrepreneur.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:02:04 UTC No. 16245346

>>16245260
Going down in history as the inventor of the first airplane worth more than any money. You wouldn't understand this either.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 10:32:52 UTC No. 16245378

>>16241665
>1903
>1905
>promptly
>suicide by alcohol
kek

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:26:22 UTC No. 16245607

>>16241665
Died aged 71 after a long career as an astronomer and in his later years running the Smithsonian institute.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:50:21 UTC No. 16245633

>>16243654
>just keep it for themselves
Assuming you invented something, keeping it to yourself poses several risks. Patent law states first to patent gets ownership. So by not patenting it you risk having it being stolen by someone else. So what if you patented it first but just kept it to yourself?
>>16243882
>It isn't about money.
Patents cost money. Doing patents right with a patent lawyer is expensive. Defending patents cost even more money. If patents go undefended patents can be lost. Simply sitting on a patent incurs maintenance fees.

Owning a patent and not utilizing it for profit has negative cost to benefit.
Not patenting and working stealthily in secret has negative risk to benefit in the form of patent theft.
The only way to be in the green is to patent and then have a business plan to profit, but if you don't have capital already, if you don't have a workshop already, if you don't own your own means of production you're at the complete mercy of investors. Wright Bro's were lucky they owned a bike shop.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:22:50 UTC No. 16245680

>>16240675
Now if you're backyard scientist it's propable somebody will tell you you have mental condition...

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:28:39 UTC No. 16245688

>>16241746
>Throw in a wife and kids and I don’t even have time to think.
marriage consumes men. I saw it while being an incel. I saw how men with bigger salaries sunk in debt while i bought techno-scientific toys and books. No wonder the gay mafia is so wealthy

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:33:39 UTC No. 16245697

>>16242020
>Why is it always da jooos??
its because they are the biggest cohesive network. Biggest and most connected

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:36:57 UTC No. 16245703

>>16242034
>What have you invented? How many symphonies have you written?

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:37:26 UTC No. 16245778

>>16242203
YOU PUT THE PETROL
IN THE CAR IT GOES
DON'T BE RAMA RAMA
AND SNIFF IT UP YOUR NOSE

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:53:32 UTC No. 16247073

>>16245607
He was unsuccessful as an astronomer too

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:18:25 UTC No. 16247091

>>16245260
>you'd expect to be rewarded for doing so.
Yeah but you also know its never certain or likely, you are just playing the odds. Not getting rich isnt the worst thing that can happen to a backyard engineer, they can also get killed by corporate sicarios. If they get lucky they get hired by a corporation for a good engineering job and get put to work for the corpo benefit.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:23:39 UTC No. 16247306

>>16245697
There used to be witches too but the jews killed them all. We live in total jew victory timeline

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:00:32 UTC No. 16248763

>>16241760
He was a drunken moron, he spent more of his research budget on holding cocktail parties and other social events for members of congress than he did on his non-flying contraption, thats what guaranteed he endless budget appropriations.
The Wrights put their successful aircraft together for less than $100 of their own money and Langley's budget ended up being over 8 figures, so its easy to estimate what portion of the tax funds that were granted to Langley were actually put to their intended use, probably substantially less than 1%.

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:23:05 UTC No. 16249900

>>16241991
Have you considered binging less Marvel slop?

>>16240675
Rules and regulations kill everything nowadays. In my country, you need to tell the state administration if you have a lab room

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 21:57:45 UTC No. 16249949

>>16242020
This. It's like crying someone is cheating in videogames or someone must be roiding because they look better than you; it's an admission of inferiorship and a cry for validation. In other words, it's pathetic.

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 03:41:53 UTC No. 16250302

>>16243660
>or permission to build one
I don't know about that. I think the govt would be fine with a billionaire building one in his ranch

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 04:25:26 UTC No. 16250359

>>16241941
Bribery, actually. Emerald slave mine money has its advantages

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 05:15:30 UTC No. 16250397

>>16242050
jewish fingers typed this post

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:20:50 UTC No. 16250803

>>16241665
WTF. The Wright brothers werea Trump supporters? What a disappoinment.

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:07:28 UTC No. 16250905

>>16241805
No sane wife would let her husband live to collect her insurrance.

Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 15:11:39 UTC No. 16250909

>>16240675
what inherent quality of a "government" or "academic scientist" would make it more likely that they* would invent something, rather than your regular genius?

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 04:35:13 UTC No. 16252166

>>16241665
The Bible is the best book you can read if you want to learn to understand science and figure out how to contribute to building a better world.

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:02:48 UTC No. 16253357

>>16240675
>Second question, is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
No.

t. Patent attorney

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:20:50 UTC No. 16253405

>>16252166
>The Bible is the best book you can read if you want to learn to understand science and figure out how to contribute to building a better world.
How's that?

Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:25:05 UTC No. 16253415

>>16253357
>t. Patent attorney
What are some backyard scientific inventions you've seen lately?

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:13:45 UTC No. 16255092

>>16242107
Apple (stock) didn't really take off until the late 90s tech boom though.

Anonymous at Wed, 26 Jun 2024 18:17:21 UTC No. 16255096

>>16241991
>>16242020
Fucking idiots.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 06:10:22 UTC No. 16256175

>>16255092
The 1990s was a terrible time to own Apple stock, its one of very few companies that didn't do well during that period.

Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:14:53 UTC No. 16256835

>>16253415
That would be a surefire way of doxxing myself, no thanks. In any case there are not many backyard science projects, mostly because this is rather expensive on such a small scale. If you want the project to get airborne, you need to set up a company, get people in on the project and funding.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 04:23:15 UTC No. 16257665

>>16253415
Why should anyone who invents something useful on their own bother to share it with the rest of the world?
>because they get rich from patents an sheeeeiiiiittttttt
Nope, the Wright brothers didn't, they were forced to go to endless court hearings and never ended up making a penny on their invention. In 1912 Wilbur Wright was overheard lamenting the fact that they'd invented the airplane while exiting a courtroom, he died later that year.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 04:46:23 UTC No. 16257685

They were college educated, for starters.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:25:48 UTC No. 16257920

>>16257665
If you can prove that the opposing party was 100% deliberate in their fraud against you could you not counter-sue them for literally every penny they own?

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:28:09 UTC No. 16257924

>>16240675
>backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?
yes because science is hard now. Back then, you could be the world's most succesful biologist by just walking out your front door and crudely dissecting insects or plants you found.

Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 22:56:11 UTC No. 16258862

>>16257665
I am sure that is what big pharma tells little pharma when they offer a pittance for their IP portfolio.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 00:45:49 UTC No. 16259067

>>16257920
you can't because you have to prove damages and also because the judge is a political appointee and the people who stole your intellectual property felt emboldened to do so because they were politically connected and knew that the judge in any court case would be on their side.

Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:05:29 UTC No. 16260024

>>16257920
if thats the case how come the wrights never made any money off their invention?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 06:19:52 UTC No. 16260772

>>16253405
You'll never know because you'll never read The Bible

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:44:11 UTC No. 16261004

>>16240675
Unironically how the hell did a car salesman manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:46:19 UTC No. 16261087

>>16240675
>accomplish
Imagine they were Russians living near nowhereland and did exactly the same.

Muuh, it's a glider,
Muuh their wind tunnel was primitive
Muhh "someone" invented the motor long before them
Muuh they never flown, using the ground effect doesn't count
Muuuh even Liliental was higher wider better without a motor
Muuh, propellers were invented long ago
Muuh, Ancient chines paper planes had flaps before Christian calendar
aso.

UShitholers are world class in robbing, stealing inventionandb usurp inventions not in doing them

Btw, Bleriot made first plane worth the name.. Has had all the modern parts.

Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 23:33:02 UTC No. 16262118

Quintessential "idea guy" here. Yes I'm aware that's regarded as a slur and not something to be proud about.

I have a series of ideas, each building upon the other, that could redefine the way people think about robotics completely. But how is a poor uneducated pleb suppose to make use of this? I don't think I could afford to go through the patent process even one time, let alone the multiple times necessary for each successive idea. How the heck am I suppose to profit off my ideas if not through patents?

Also there's ethical concerns about contributing to the advancement of what someone will inevitably repurpose into a weapon. I don't want that on my conscious. I'm convinced that by sitting on this idea and keeping it secret, it will ensure nobody will come up with the same idea. I mean it's based on old tech that's not obscure or anything. If after 100 years or whatever, if nobody else has thought of this I'm pretty sure it'll safely remain undiscovered for many more years if I simply remain silent.
>if I simply remain silent
And yet here I am posting about it like a dumb ass. Plz don't ask for details.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 00:12:59 UTC No. 16262151

>>16262118
Build something to the first sellable product as quick as you can.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 01:30:01 UTC No. 16262210

>>16262151
This was my first thought as well and would be very easy to do, but how does this secure an IP? Right now the only thing I've got going for me is nobody has a clue. However once the cat's out of the bag so to speak the only thing protecting me will be the law, which truthfully I don't trust to do it's job. Also this doesn't address my ethical concerns.

>as quick as you can.
I've sat on this for 10+ years so I'm in no rush. It's given me time to refine and expand upon my ideas.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 05:16:07 UTC No. 16262463

>>16262118
Be an engineer and start making drawing with rulers and proposals, putting cardboards together, learn to use just enough math to tackle variables in design.
https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/24681

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:00:39 UTC No. 16263398

>>16262118
you're a moron and you have zero skills. your lack of skills and knowledge is what powers your dunning kurgerism and your idiot delusions of grandiosity

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:29:32 UTC No. 16263428

>>16262118
>I'm a genius inventor with a world changing idea
>>16262151
>try actually making something in real life
>>16262210
>hm that would be very simple but no
>>16263398
Why does /sci/ attract these delusional schizos

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:34:26 UTC No. 16263438

>>16263428
That's why I love this board so much

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:37:05 UTC No. 16263444

>>16261004
Spacex better off ban

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 22:59:00 UTC No. 16263465

>>16262210
Write it down.
Seal in envelope.
Mail it to yourself, registered mail or whatever.
Don’t open it.

Now you have sealed proof you thought of it first. Present it as evidence when you sue someone for stealing your idea.

Anonymous at Mon, 1 Jul 2024 23:08:47 UTC No. 16263472

>>16240675
>nironically how the hell did two bicycle shop owners manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?

>two bicycle shop owners
If you're educated, I'm sure you understand that everything you learn and accomplish could have been done without ever stepping foot into academia. You only need to self study, and the scope of printed works at the time was far smaller.

>major government or academic scientist
Major government accomplishments are really the work of a few great men, and a multitude of people around them that provide support. For the academic scientist bit, I already addressed it in my first point. A formally conferred degree does not grant you magic powers.

>is the backyard independent scientist extinct in today's world?

Mostly, and only due to the financial barrier to entry. Low hanging fruit all picked and such.

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 17:30:08 UTC No. 16264553

>>16263472
>A formally conferred degree does not grant you magic powers.
it only makes you stupider

Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 23:29:56 UTC No. 16265151

>>16263428
By all accounts, based on this thread, the person inventing something rarely benefits from it.
I might be fine with this if it would help humanity, but realistically robots are going to be used to replace humans in the work force to the benefit of only a small select few individuals or be used as weapons of war and violence.
Maybe it's just the pessimist or Luddite in me but I simply can't see where the good in this endeavor is.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 06:27:44 UTC No. 16265554

>>16262118
They gave out loans to anything bipedal back in zero intrest rates
Just wait it out

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:06:55 UTC No. 16266620

>>16261004
That technology will never lead to a space age.

Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 23:26:16 UTC No. 16266857

>>16265151
They benefit if they invent something they need to want to use and keep the secret to themselves and take it with them to their grave.
t. beneficiary

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 00:40:44 UTC No. 16266947

>>16262118
>I don't think I could afford to go through the patent process even one time
Patents are surprisingly affordable if you're willing to DIY it. Less than $2 grand. You can check the USPTO fee schedule.

>t. patent holder

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:29:05 UTC No. 16266987

>>16240675
This is the same line of question authors get asked all the time by hylics and NPCs:
>where do you get your ideas for books?
As if there is a “10,001 story ideas reference” and authors go up to the attic and flip through the pages.
If you don’t understand “creation of something novel’ without an explanation you won’t understand with one.

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 01:47:52 UTC No. 16267001

>>16240754
You can deduce the existence of quarks a priori dumbass

Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 16:35:09 UTC No. 16267762

>>16265151
Lol no, material wealth is of little concern to those who enjoy the gift of non-material wealth like thoughts. Ideas are just recombine and resequence thing you already know, and schizo does for free when they zone out when bored with the material. However only well versed(trained) schizo can select ideas that really concerns the real world by doing experiments. And the best of them, powerful yet easily accessible ideas spread by self fueling and duplication like memes and wild fire, not something one can control or name after. Mid ideas needs a lot of training and written down instructions.
Secrets are frankly embarrasing. And to play along and live off of secrets is just doubly embarassing. And to dilute and wipe the masses of their existing memeories for a profit has to be done on matters most embarrassing of them all on just how little contribution they are actually making. Only a pyscho would consider doing this an honorable profession.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:29:17 UTC No. 16268548

>>16267001
you don't even have a back yard

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:23:54 UTC No. 16268586

>>16260772
I read it caver to cover, but they didn't let me set up the nativity scene anymore when I killed two birds in a spell to sacrifice to Yahweh like the virgin Mary did.
Overall, unhelpful.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 06:37:48 UTC No. 16268601

>>16240675
>Unironically how the hell did two bicycle shop owners manage to accomplish this before any major government or academic scientist?
Because they stoled the idea from a brazilian but because of "sopa de macaco uma delicia" the global press didn't paid attention.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:54:09 UTC No. 16268716

>>16243654
it's not about the money it's about the glory and fame of being the genius, it's having your name next to people like Einstein

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 08:55:14 UTC No. 16268718

>>16268716
I fart in your face.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:04:03 UTC No. 16269172

>>16242034
Those inventors and explorers were the product of white societies. Doesn't matter how talented and clever they are, they would ammount to nothing if they lived in africa or india. In fact, the achievements of most non white scientists (except for east asians) are the result of all whites forming functional societies that encourages discovery and exploration.
So fuck off. Without whites there wouldn't be a single black scientists at all.

Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 17:14:39 UTC No. 16269189

>>16263465
Every book on patents and the protection of your ideas states that this doesn't work and can backfire. You can check all the court cases when this was done and judges never take those envelopes into account.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 05:16:52 UTC No. 16269990

>>16269172
whites elevated every civilization in the entire world by bringing everyone vast knowledge, technology and a culture that creates progress and what did whites receive in return?
genocidal hatred. jealousy and backstabbing.
just goes to show how useless altruism is when nonwhites are concerned.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 19:52:21 UTC No. 16270649

>>16240675
They were smart because they never went to school. Instead of spending their youths memorizing propaganda out of schoolbooks they spent it engaging with reality and developing useful hands on skills.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 23:15:53 UTC No. 16270897

>>16242072
kek

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 23:16:58 UTC No. 16270899

>>16249949
When Satan tricked Adam and Eve into eating the apple, God should've given up all his powers and let Satan rule the world. He deserved it, right?

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 23:18:21 UTC No. 16270901

>>16242034
Something tells me you wouldnt have the confidence to say this to a black guy, or a jew.

Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 23:33:02 UTC No. 16270917

>>16269990
>vice
>ignorance
>superstition
>brutality
>cruelty
>cannibalism
>oppression
All these things are good anon. The entire "white man's burden" was just a Jewish trick to pacify the planet when white man should have been learning from darkie.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:41:08 UTC No. 16271380

>>16240675
i am surprised that the first powered flight vehicle was invented so late, even if it failed mid-air, i think a competent machinist in the modern day could probably build and fly the powerplant and the airplane frame and fly it for a couple meters under its own power.

Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 18:19:15 UTC No. 16271742

>>16271380
The surprise is that unpowered GLIDERS were invented so late. No one in the renaissance ever made a paper plane?
First gliders were made in the 1890s.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 19:32:14 UTC No. 16273129

>>16271742
>No one in the renaissance ever made a paper plane?
they didn't even know that air existed back then. it wasn't until the late 1600s that the atmosphere was discovered.
also its somewhat wrong to consider the renaissance as some sort of great leap forward, it was a rediscovery of and newfound appreciation for ancient philosophies

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 19:57:47 UTC No. 16273155

>>16273129
The Wright Brothers were able to create their incredible success also via rejection of contemporary information and reliance on well aged philosophies. Nearly all of their education was from The Bible.

Anonymous at Mon, 8 Jul 2024 20:04:26 UTC No. 16273161

>>16240675
Loads of software and apps still get developed in "backyards". it's just that mechanical tech specifically is now dead. As for your first question, I too find it surprising for there were a lot of big names working on the theory of flight before them yet they all failed to achieve it practically.

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 05:22:08 UTC No. 16273744

>>16270917
Unironically kys edgy faggot

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:13:47 UTC No. 16273999

>>16271380
Leonardo DaVinci inventedone, he just lacked a proper engine.

Anonymous at Tue, 9 Jul 2024 16:45:46 UTC No. 16274364

>>16273999
that weird spiral thing isnt a flying machine, engine or not. He could not even come up with a paper plane.

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 03:32:45 UTC No. 16275539

>>16273161
>it's just that mechanical tech specifically is now dead
A lot of the things people would want to invent and build on their own have been made illegal. Thats one of the way government and globohomo inc. collude to prevent competition from encroaching on business monopolies

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 05:15:03 UTC No. 16275598

>>16273129
>they didn't even know that air existed back then. it wasn't until the late 1600s that the atmosphere was discovered.
There is no way for sailing ship to exist before someone discovered air.

>>16273155
>The Wright Brothers were able to create their incredible success also via rejection of contemporary information and reliance on well aged philosophies.
This.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aow8hVpdSHQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAYPi0nqJ50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaUzq4YuErs

Anonymous at Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:45:26 UTC No. 16275749

>>16275598
>There is no way for sailing ship to exist before someone discovered air.
you're clearly wrong about that.
selective breeding was done for thousands of years before DNA was discovered

Anonymous at Thu, 11 Jul 2024 04:07:58 UTC No. 16276883

>>16275749
>There is no way for sailing ship to exist before someone discovered air.
Really makes you wonder if cannon fire and catapulted projectiles followed parabolic paths before Newton invented gravity

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 05:55:24 UTC No. 16278300

>>16276883
>schrodinger's cannon fire

Anonymous at Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:27:24 UTC No. 16278584

>>16275749
>selective breeding was done for thousands of years before DNA was discovered
Your analogy doesn't make any sense.
An experienced breeder can look at 2 dogs from different breeds and tell which is which in a couple seconds. The same breeder can collect samples from one, but label it after the other on purpose. Without a reliable database for comparison, no geneticist would be able to tell and again, he must rely on someone experienced.

>>16276883
>Really makes you wonder if cannon fire and catapulted projectiles followed parabolic paths before Newton invented gravity
gravity is such a funny joke.

>newton discovered mass attraction
>cavendish proved mass attraction
>einstein discovered it is actually space push
>the best proof for einsteinian space push is a newtonian mass attraction based experiment
>space push is a natural law
>Natural law based experiment is very dificult to get to work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PdiUoKa9Nw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fW5Wz2PGlQ

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 05:16:35 UTC No. 16279911

>>16278584
the analogy makes sense, you just don't want to understand it

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 06:16:13 UTC No. 16279942

>>16242034
Race isn't just skin color
I agree it's cringe to take any credit at all. But it's only right to feel pride in it just as one would if their immediate family had done it. And race is an extended family, a genetic cluster.

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:01:27 UTC No. 16280022

>bunch of scientists postulate for a decade whether something is possible
>bunch of engineers get drunk in a weekend and want to test if something is possible
Many such cases

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:07:19 UTC No. 16280025

>Remains undiscovered until 1890

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 09:24:19 UTC No. 16280075

>>16279942
racism is the one true ideology, people who disagree all look like this or worse

Anonymous at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 12:32:47 UTC No. 16280197

>>16240675
Because they wanted to fly and the "scientists" only wanted their paycheck for writing bullshit.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 03:05:21 UTC No. 16281906

>>16280197
If Langley had actually invented anything there would have been no more excuse for his massive annual budget

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 06:56:19 UTC No. 16282084

>>16279911
No, it doesn't

The idea that generations of sailors died from natural causes without realizing what men are up against during a storm is absurd.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:05:38 UTC No. 16282584

>>16274364
>that weird spiral thing isnt a flying machine
OK, so what is it then?

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:07:10 UTC No. 16282587

>>16282584
This looks like a helicopter to absolutely no one

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:10:14 UTC No. 16282594

>>16282587
You don't have to announce what you do not think it is; it is sufficient if you enlighten us as to what it is.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:20:18 UTC No. 16282600

>>16240675
All it takes is the right person with the right skills, and knowledge then the rest is effort and time. Without knowing anything about aerodynamics try to design a plane in kerbal space program. See how long it takes you to just get a shitty thing going, it will not fly.

B at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:50:00 UTC No. 16282621

Is this your stupid moment where you say stupid things even though you're already retarded?

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:51:05 UTC No. 16282818

>>16250397
he is not wrong though you goy cattle

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:02:11 UTC No. 16282827

>>16261087
nice revisionism and victim mentality you subhuman third world shitholer faggot.

Anonymous at Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:04:13 UTC No. 16282829

>>16268601
your brazilian shitskin cope does not work when you talk to people who know how planes actually work.

Anonymous at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:17:08 UTC No. 16284011

>>16282827
third worlders are third worlders because of their inherent mental deficiencies, so you should be expecting them to behave foolishly and stupidly.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 03:04:53 UTC No. 16285955

>>16282829
Sure, but for any given topic the overwhelming majority of people don't know anything about it. Even in a popular topic like aviation that discussed constantly on this board, most of the people discussing it don't know enough about it to land a plane even if their life was on the line.

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 03:09:11 UTC No. 16285962

>>16282587
It actually works if you spin it fast enough bud.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsG-Mcn29kg

Anonymous at Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:32:58 UTC No. 16286338

>>16240675
Because the modern era is cucked?

Anonymous at Fri, 19 Jul 2024 04:47:02 UTC No. 16288066

>>16285962
he could've spun it fast enough using the greek steam engine, but he didn't figure that out because he was too low IQ

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 04:01:08 UTC No. 16289219

>>16288066
>but he didn't figure that out because he was too low IQ
He was low IQ because he was gay. Homosexuality and low IQ are synonymous, thats why theres no famously successful gay scientists.

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 04:30:45 UTC No. 16289229

They lived in an era where they had no access to advanced engineering tools, and the equations for fluid mechanics were only useful for simple flows. The existing ideas of lift acting on an airplane wing with sufficient force to allow a manned flight was theoretically known, but again, there was no established way to design or control such a wing.

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 05:45:58 UTC No. 16289276

>>16285962
That drone looks like it really sucks. The problem isn't generating life. Almost any design can produce a small amount of lift if you spin/launch/shoot it hard enough. The problem is producing enough lift to allow a human pilot.

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:01:29 UTC No. 16289285

>>16285962
That video has nothing to do with leonardos design. That is 4 separate corkscrews mounted on a drone. Leonardo's design doesnt have a rotor, its a rigid, fixed corkscrew. At this point i consider the leonardo helicopter design as a litmus test to tell apart whos human and whos an animal on 2 legs, imagine the mental gymnastics, conformity and self-delusion required to believe this silly corkscrew is a helicopter.
Also... the engine is 99% of the merit, you need a high power to weight ratio. Some hueg 17th century steam engine would have not lifted any helicopter, not that Leonardo had any of those available or thought of inventing one
https://www.key.aero/forum/historic-aviation/118978-with-a-big-enough-engine-you-can-make-a-barn-door-fly-who-said-that
WITH A BIG ENOUGH ENGINE YOU CAN MAKE A BARN DOOR FLY-Pilot proverb

Leonardo could have invented a paper plane if he was that smart. A glider. Doesnt need engine. No one invented paper planes until the late 19th century
Leonardo had a shitty design for a parachute though, but they have had designs for shitty wooden parachutes since the 9th century so it wasnt his invention

I'll give him credit for his invention of the ball bearing though

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:02:38 UTC No. 16289286

>>16289229
>They lived in an era where they had no access to advanced engineering tools

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:11:38 UTC No. 16289295

>>16289286
I suppose technically the engineering tools they had at the time were comparatively advanced, but compared to modern tools or even tools which existed just 30 years later it was nothing.

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:18:23 UTC No. 16289301

>>16289295
What advanced engineering tools you need to make a glider?
Theres examples from nature. Flying squirrels, and pretty much any common bird like seagulls or doves glides a lof of time, you just see them going on not flapping their wings for stretches of time, plenty of inspiration for alleged observers of nature
>hmm im just an observer hmm this is so interesting
No one ever thought of making a wood or iron frame and covering it with waxed fabric or leather? Doesnt seem very advanced

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 17:55:36 UTC No. 16289858

>>16289301
You would think, but hindsight is 20-20

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 18:12:18 UTC No. 16289879

>>16289295
modern tools design useless garbage like shartliner, 737s that crash killing all aboard and the f-35. peak engineering was in the 1950s & early 60s

Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 18:28:22 UTC No. 16289895

>>16240675
Hard work and dedication.
Read books about it.
This is a good one.
If you're too lazy/busy to read, get the audio book.

Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 18:59:18 UTC No. 16291169

>>16289879
This. Aircraft have become less capable over the past 50 years. Projects like Concorde or the SR-71 don't happen anymore because nobody has the capacity to make them happen

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:36:27 UTC No. 16291824

>>16291169
what happens to china when there is no more advanced western technology for them to rip off?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 05:42:37 UTC No. 16291829

>>16240770
Overregulated systems create conformity which stifles innovation.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:17:57 UTC No. 16292215

>>16291824
>what happens to china when there is no more advanced western technology for them to rip off?
The goal is domination, not technology. When your opponent dies you can relax.
If there were no enemies we could relax in a tropical delta but alas you need military might hence an economy hence engineering

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:47:30 UTC No. 16292239

>>16245378
stuff used to move slower back then without internet and stuff

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 16:04:09 UTC No. 16292262

>>16252166
This is unironically like one of those Bell curve memes where the low and high ends of IQ share the same opinion for different reasons. The Bible itself is very intelligently designed despite being written across generations, and there is meaning in so many aspects of it.

>>16253405
Like the other guy mentioned, it's best to start by reading the Bible, but you'll begin to notice patterns, symbolism, paradoxes, and parallels that have their own meanings and contribute to a larger expression of the messages the Bible conveys.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:58:25 UTC No. 16292570

>>16292262
give me an example, i can only see stories that can teach you lessons about life, maybe, like "its good to be savvy" or "dont have sex out of marriage because this bad thing can happen"

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:04:15 UTC No. 16292581

>>16240675
because engineering is the only actual science.

(｡>﹏<｡) at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:44:58 UTC No. 16293980

bumo

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 23:26:48 UTC No. 16294080

>>16240675
>is the backyard independent scientist
see the anons building their robowaifus, we'll live to see replicants from blade runner soon enough

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 00:53:07 UTC No. 16295448

>>16294080

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:47:48 UTC No. 16296175

>>16249949
>t. cheating, roided kike

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:40:09 UTC No. 16296299

>>16292570
Men and women are different. Start there.

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:46:04 UTC No. 16296308

>>16296299
I know men and women are different, what does that have to do with the bible?
Oh oh, the bible has some story with men and women? And they acted different? Mindblown!

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:09:24 UTC No. 16296922

>>16296308
why don't you want to read The Bible? what do you have against it?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:40:03 UTC No. 16298439

>>16296922

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:41:19 UTC No. 16299888

>>16289895
You should read Orville's books, first person accounts are always better than 3rd person ones

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 05:36:57 UTC No. 16299974

>>16298439
>star of david shirt

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8XrJxIyu0w

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 05:41:05 UTC No. 16299976

>>16296922
I've read some of it, but I got bored, and I've been slacking.
I've been meaning to finish it, but have you ever tried to just *read* psalm after psalm? It's brutal.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:16:11 UTC No. 16300084

>>16240675
Yeah, I remain skeptical, these rarely ever take off .

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:05:05 UTC No. 16300544

>>16296922
>why don't you want to read The Bible?
I barely read anything today because by adhd got very bad but once upon a time i read many books, i also dont have time now (i work a lot). When i had time and an attention span i tried to read the bible, i read part of it and found it boring. I saw nothing of value in terms of teachings, patterns, whatever you want to call them. Why dont you just tell me what these ahmazing teachings are?
Man and woman are different? I knew that before i read a part of the bible

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 17:47:34 UTC No. 16300591

>>16299976
Save time, just read one of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John). You can read one in an afternoon easy.

Then go from there if you want.