Image not available

4888x3592

SW.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 Why scifi can be more realistic and less ugly?

Anonymous No. 16240910

>scifi movie / show
>SCIENCE fiction
>there is no science, just "looks cool (nope, it's the ugliest shit ever created), consoom it"
Maybe is just me.

Anonymous No. 16240914

Caring so much about 'scientific accuracy' in sci-fi is something only retards do.

Anonymous No. 16240921

>>16240914
>called SCIENCE
>you know what, fuck science
Not caring about accuracy just shows how low-IQ, ameritards are.

Anonymous No. 16240934

>>16240910
it's called science FICTION for a reason Anon...

Anonymous No. 16241044

>>16240934
It's called SCIENCE fiction for a reason anon...

Anonymous No. 16241049

>>16241044
It's called SCIENCE FICTION because Hugo Gernsback wanted a catchy name for his magazine's stories about speculative technology. Don't take either the "science" or the "fiction" part too literally.

Anonymous No. 16241081

>>16240910
>minorities
Why is so much of the language people use in The Current Year such a perverse inversion of reality?

Anonymous No. 16241095

>>16240910
I think The Expanse did a fairly good job of trying to get realism captured.

Anonymous No. 16241099

>>16241081
Even the authorities …are minorities … at my water park

Anonymous No. 16241267

>>16240910
Star Wars is fantasy, set in a science-fiction-y environment. Everyone should know this.

Anonymous No. 16241272

>>16241267
It's a planetary romance more than anything, I guess.

Anonymous No. 16241302

>>16241272
space opera