Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:43:17 UTC No. 16243884

>>16243875
>a regulatory substance produced in an organism and transported in tissue fluids such as blood or sap to stimulate specific cells or tissues into action.
It's a hormone.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:03:56 UTC No. 16243905

>>16243884
>transporting saliva produced by a female homo sapiens into a male homo sapiens' body has a regulatory effect on the male's physiology
>therefore female saliva is to be defined as a hormone
The absolute state of experts.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:24:18 UTC No. 16243942

>>16243905
Wasn't produced in the male's body, so it doesn't count
>has a regulatory effect on the male's physiology
Citation needed

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:34:54 UTC No. 16243958

>>16243942
>Wasn't produced in the male's body, so it doesn't count
So that needs to be part of the definition or you need to consider that sunlight and animal fat is exogenous as well.
>Citation needed
No citations are needed for obvious axiomatic assumptions that everyone shares except the most mentally ill / woke left.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:50:00 UTC No. 16243984

>>16243875

did not read.

the authors purposefully put a scantily dressed woman and say vitamin "D3" at several places implying le D so people (men) get aroused and think about LE SEX which allows pop sci shit and it's authors get away with bad writing and low quality articles because the readers just read a few snippets think hmmm oh ok and then look up women wearing these clothes or outright porn. this happens every day and people act like it don't affect them but it do because fast forward another hours the coomed they got some insight into le vitamin d but it's a superficial one that was read not understood so another midwit is made.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 11:54:39 UTC No. 16243994

>>16243958
>So that needs to be part of the definition
It is
>>a regulatory substance produced in an organism and transported in tissue
>produced in an organism
This is just a plain english way of saying "endogenous". The saliva of another person is not endogenous.
>No citations are needed for obvious axiomatic assumptions that everyone shares
What the fuck are you smoking, it is absolutely not an axiomatic assumption that female saliva has regulatory effects on male physiology. What do you think "regulatory effects" means in this context?
Stick to physics / maths you autist, stay in your lane.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:28:02 UTC No. 16244022

>>16243994
>This is just a plain english way of saying "endogenous".
No it's not but this would be:
>a regulatory substance in an organism that is produced and transported within the same organism
>What do you think "regulatory effects" means in this context?
It means that a substance is part of a process / chain of chemical reactions in which the substance either stimulates or inhibits the next step in that process / chain. Now first of all humans need an exogenous source of vitamin d or a stimulus like sunlight so the definition of vitamin d as an endogenous substance is at least incomplete. Second of all any interaction between two particles will have a causal chain-like effect like cue sports. In the case of intimacy these effects are well-known: people get less stressed and more aroused which means less cortisol production and more oxytocin for example. I guess you're legit autistic for me to spell it out for you in such a literal way.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:41:16 UTC No. 16244039

>>16244022
> Second of all any interaction between two particles will have a causal chain-like effect like cue sports
That's not the same as "regulatory effects".
Vitamin D is produced endogenously. Yes, it requires sunlight, but all of our endogenous hormones require various substrates from our diet.
You are a retarded hair-splitting pedant. You are the definition of a word-thinker.
>“Word-thinking is a term I invented to describe a situation in which people are trying to win an argument by adjusting the definition of words. In these situations there is no appeal to reason. But that’s okay, because facts and logic are not persuasive anyway. Word-thinking usually happens when people are bad at logic but don’t realize it.”

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:10:50 UTC No. 16244058

>>16244039
>the definition of words
Except there is no ''the definition'' of words. What does the word ''tree'' refer to? An object? An idea? How to universally define an idea to encapsulate all possible trees in existence?

What you call hair-splitting and pedantic is the very heart of science because science is about building the most valid and accurate thus detailed description of what we observe. If you went to university then you would know that a professor will doubt and criticize any word you write.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:14:14 UTC No. 16244062

>>16244058
Mate you're trying to argue that female saliva is a fucking hormone, you swallowed the deconstructivist kool-aid.

Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 14:23:47 UTC No. 16244134

>>16244062
You are responding to a bot brother.