Anonymous at Thu, 20 Jun 2024 12:11:42 UTC No. 16244011

>>16243999
>"conclusions wasnt supported by study methodology"
Isn't that a valid reason though? The bigger problem is that not all studies with unsupported conclusions are removed or prevented from being published and shared. That raises the question why this particular study is under much more scrutiny than other study. The obvious answer to that can be plausibly denied by claiming that politically divisive issues should be handled with extra care benefiting all parties involved. You can't prove that the removal is an attempt to suppress the truth about the lies. Brilliant how the system works , is it not?