🧵 Is this real?
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 02:29:55 UTC No. 16244976
What is the actual scientific basis for this post? Pop Or is this an agenda to normalize these types of relationships citing biological nature,
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:25:52 UTC No. 16245267
>>16244976
>Is this real?
Yes, obviously it's real. All you have to do is spend some times with horny animals.
Animals are horny, they don't have the social constructs of gender and sex and behavior expectations and rules that we humans have imagined and instituted, so they act on impulse. A ravagingly horny male has to release all that tension, and not all animals know how to masturbate, or they simply cannot masturbate, and sometimes they'll release it with with any hint of intimacy, including with other males.
It doesn't mean that they're "gay". it means they are horny and any sexual release will do.
If it's with a female, a pregnancy results, and the horny genes get passed on. If it's with a male, they got a release and but nothing happens.
That's it, that's all there is to it, there's no agenda, just natural animal impulses at work.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:18:52 UTC No. 16245593
What nonsense is that? Stay near a horny goat/dog, it will hump you. It will hump anyone nearby regardless of species or sex.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:34:47 UTC No. 16245615
>>16244976
Atheists are sodomites and reprobates, that's the "basis" for it. Man is not an animal though, no matter how much those pederasts will claim we are. They just want to bring man down to live like the beasts of the field. They literally think man-made classifications of species proves we're animals and related to apes and all life came from a common ancestor.
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 14:04:23 UTC No. 16245644
>>16244976
Inter-species sexual behaviour is also widespread in animals. Doesn't mean it should be encouraged in humans.
>An appeal to nature is a rhetorical technique for presenting and proposing the argument that "a thing is good because it is 'natural', or bad because it is 'unnatural'."[1] In debate and discussion, an appeal-to-nature argument can considered to be a bad argument, because the implicit primary premise "What is natural is good" has no factual meaning beyond rhetoric in some or most contexts.