🗑️ 🧵 A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination
Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:35:02 UTC No. 16246121
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien
>We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
>Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death.
>These findings indicate the urgent need to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of death with the goal of risk stratification and avoidance of death for the large numbers of individuals who have taken or will receive one or more COVID-19 vaccines in the future.
Fully peer reviewed analysis on covid deaths. Yes, >70% of deaths are found to be caused by the vaccines themselves.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 16:01:37 UTC No. 16247578
>>16246121
Too bad the pharmaceutical corporations are not liable! Don't you remember your governments agreeing to that contract? That contract which releases the corpos' from all liabilities? The contract which makes it YOUR fault for taking it?
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 16:46:00 UTC No. 16247669
>>16247578
They're immune to lawsuits as long as there was no deception involved.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:36:02 UTC No. 16247761
>>16246121
>2024
>still thinking about "the vax"
rent-free, all day, every day.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:45:54 UTC No. 16248100
>>16247761
No refunds vax cattle.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:37:40 UTC No. 16248586
>>16246121
I can't believe it pfizer is now responding to this claim. Check this link to find out about how you can be entitled to compensation.
https://www.pfizer.com/refunds.html
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 05:46:23 UTC No. 16248816
>>16247761
Getting emotionally triggered by these threads is essentially admitting that you regret getting the clotshot jab
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 07:18:47 UTC No. 16248895
Some of the highlights among the causes of death they said were the vaccine
>'Unexplained' (1 day after the vaccine)
>COVID-19 positive. Respiratory failure due to bacterial pneumonia, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and encephalopathy. (250 days after the vaccine)
>Hypoxic brain damage following an anaphylactic reaction to anesthetics (8 days after the vaccine)
>Hyperglycemic coma (6 days after the vaccine)
>Sepsis (234 days after the vaccine)
>105 cases where they didn't even have individual case data but the deaths were "cardiac/hematological related"
>Head injury (1 day after the vaccine)
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:05:01 UTC No. 16249172
>>16247669
This. Since they told you what they were going to do, you implicitly accepted it.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 14:08:18 UTC No. 16249175
>>16248895
head injury is 100% vax related
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:51:19 UTC No. 16249312
>>16246121
the good news if you didn't get the vaxx is that now you know who is truly a slave. You can treat vaxxed people like cattle without any remorse as they are too stupid to understand they are cattle just like cows think they are free and offer no resistance
thank you for all your money vaxx cattle lol. I live a great life while you were injected with a mystery fluid and defend it ahahahahahahahahahahah
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:01:00 UTC No. 16249323
>>16246121
why'd they capitalize "review" like that
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:15:42 UTC No. 16249337
>>16249332
Funny how that argument wasn't used to nuance covid-death rate during the pandemic.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:22:32 UTC No. 16249356
>>16248816
>you regret getting the clotshot jab
I'm about to get the next one, happily and voluntarily.
Fuck off, paranoid shithead.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:22:43 UTC No. 16249358
>>16249337
It was though.
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:42:05 UTC No. 16249400
>>16249358
Which is why toddlers needed to get injections that had no value to them?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:49:43 UTC No. 16249412
>>16249358
So you agree that masks, lockdowns and jabs were unnecessary because old people die anyway so who knows and who cares about the exact cause of death?
Anonymous at Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:51:36 UTC No. 16249415
>>16248895
lol
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 07:01:46 UTC No. 16250457
>>16249312
you wont do shit, you never do, fatty
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 08:12:50 UTC No. 16250496
>>16246121
Is this even a reputable journal? What kind of journal charges for submitting an article? Is this common in medicine?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 10:53:53 UTC No. 16250660
>>16250496
Plenty of journals charge for submitting articles. I'd argue it's more common than not. The real red flag is journals that let you self-publish for a fee.
Anyway, I've no idea how reputable or not this particular journal is, but you only have to actually read the paper to see it's a complete joke.
See
>>16248895
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:13:38 UTC No. 16250680
>>16250660
Unfortunately random summary of summaries is irrelevant. They had three physicians independently review case files. You can only be mad at the scientific bar which they certainly held or exceeded. If science isn't good enough for you, maybe you shouldn't be on this board antivaxxer.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:31:57 UTC No. 16250689
>>16249412
Maybe I do or don't, what's it to this study?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:07:29 UTC No. 16250719
>>16250680
>They had three physicians independently review case files
And said 3 physicians are demonstrably idiots by their own work.
Also, they didn't have access to the case files for all the shit they declared vaccine deaths.
Also also, you can't accurately determine something is a vaccine death from a fucking one word summary that simply declares the death "unexplained" let alone from a report that says the death was caused by a fucking head injury.
Also also also, the reviews might have been done independently, but the reviewers weren't "independent". They were all fucking antivax coauthors from the paper. They neglected to actually fucking name the reviewers within the text of the paper, but the initials match.
In summary, vaccines don't cause allergic reactions to sedatives, and you're an idiot.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:14:13 UTC No. 16250726
>>16250719
1. What is wrong with their work? Do you have the case information? Are you a physician and can you review their work?
2. The physicians who are key in reporting the data have their names on the paper. Are you retarded?
Just make some concrete claims. You won't, of course, because you want everyone to just believe your shoddy critique. Tone-down the obvious antiscience bias and stick to facts. It is very alarming that you can't even quote the paper for these so-obvious flaws.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 12:46:24 UTC No. 16250760
>>16250726
>1. What is wrong with their work?
Their conclusions are nakedly ridiculous.
>Do you have the case information?
I have the information they used to reach their conclusions which was included in the supplemental materials of the study you didn't fucking read, you fucking clown.
>Are you a physician
No, and they shouldn't be either. The physicians that actually performed the autopsies that they're contradicting with dipshit conclusions are though.
>and can you review their work?
Anyone can. They included their work in the study, as previously mentioned.
>2. The physicians who are key in reporting the data have their names on the paper. Are you retarded?
Dipshit, paper authors and citations are completely separate things. You will note, the physicians who actually performed the autopsies they're shitting all over DON'T have their names on the paper except as citations.
In summary, learn to read, learn how scientific papers work, eat shit, and die. In any particular order.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:50:10 UTC No. 16251250
>>16250496
Most good journals have two options:
1) Submit for free, but the article becomes paywalled for x amount of time
2) Pay ~1000 USD to make you article open access to all
The price in that journal is surprisingly high. The impact factor is 1.8, which is very low for medical fields.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:17:41 UTC No. 16251318
>>16250719
>>16250726
>and you're an idiot.
>I'm summary, learn to read, learn how scientific papers work, eat shit, and die. In any particular order.
What compels people to behave and direct vitriol in such a manner?
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:17:46 UTC No. 16251319
>>16250760
>nakedly ridiculous
>supplemental materials
>not a physician
>anyone can review science
No argument, just endless bluster.
As for the point about the physicians that performed the autopsies, it is very obvious why their names wouldn't be on the paper. You are obviously an ill-informed jackass incapable of stringing together a cogent point.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 21:19:42 UTC No. 16251576
>>16251318
Disrespect is earned.
>>16251319
>No argument
Yeah. You didn't have one. I provided specific citations from the paper of them being wrong. Fucking clown.
Also
>implying their work is science
>As for the point about the physicians that performed the autopsies, it is very obvious why their names wouldn't be on the paper
Yes. They didn't help produce it. Which went to my original point, you dumbfuck. I hope in your next life you're born with higher intelligence. Or as something that can't type. Whichever.
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:25:57 UTC No. 16251856
>>16250660
>but you only have to actually read the paper to see it's a complete joke
how would a vaccine supposed to protect from covid 19 have a covid 19 death on its hands if it worked? at best youre just making the case the vaccine is useless
Anonymous at Mon, 24 Jun 2024 23:51:36 UTC No. 16251883
>>16251856
>how would a vaccine supposed to protect from covid 19 have a covid 19 death on its hands if it worked?
What does that have to do with the claims made in the paper regarding vaccine caused deaths?
God, not only are you a fucking idiot, you can't even stay on topic. Does the infant need some keys jangled for them so they can have something to focus on?
https://www.cdc.gov/ncird/whats-new
>Protection against COVID-19 from earlier versions of the COVID-19 vaccine decreased over several months after vaccination. Based on that, we expect that protection from the updated vaccine will also decline over time. The same is true for the protection derived from infection.
>>16248895
>(250 days after the vaccine)
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:34:06 UTC No. 16253014
>>16251318
cognitive dissonance, when people are put in the position of choosing between changing their world view and throwing a crybaby tantrum, people who are too narcissistic to consider the possibility that they were ever wrong about anything will always react by throwing a crybaby tantrum. people who are mature and intelligent to learn will accept new information and adapt to it
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:48:31 UTC No. 16253796
>>16249356
>t, (((judas goat))) trying to lead goyim to their genocide
Anonymous at Tue, 25 Jun 2024 23:38:33 UTC No. 16253879
>>16247761
I seem to be in a minority where i didn't take it but don't give a fuck about covid or the vaccine anymore its boring ,these people are worse than vegans now
Anonymous at Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:37:28 UTC No. 16256879
>>16255418
How come excess deaths spiked so massively after the administration of the vax?
Anonymous at Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:41:03 UTC No. 16258595
>>16257310
lol
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 05:50:45 UTC No. 16259339
"The data reported in the Dutch paper is as damning as it's blunt. It details how the Pfizer placebo-controlled randomized trial in advance of the roll out showed a 36% higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group. People who had been given the so-called vaccine were 36% more likely to suffer an adverse event than people who had received the placebo. And yet the populations of the world were soon told it was a pandemic of the unvaccinated. They were told the products that were not vaccines in any sense were safe and effective. Safe and effective, that's lies. Lies. The trusting millions, the trusting billions were relentlessly shamed by propaganda telling them that avoiding the products they were as good as murderers granny and everyone else within a five mile radius. They were called Covid deniers, anti-vaxxers, Covidiots, when big pharma and governments knew in advance that the products were not fit to be described as safe. In fact they were lethally dangerous for some. And since they've not been tested anyway for transmissibility, they ought never for a moment to have been described as effective either. Because the side effects of the jabs were things like stroke, heart attack, blood clotting conditions which are common enough in the general population, it was all too easy to pretend people dying of those were not dying because of the jabs. In the words of the report "this commonality hinders clinical suspicion and consequently it's detection as adverse vaccine reaction."
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 05:51:45 UTC No. 16259340
…continued
All these conditions, cardiovascular disease, excess blood clots, hemorrhages, myo- and pericarditis, autoimmune disease, encephalitis which is inflammation in the brain, bleeding in the brain, diffuse blood clots all over the body, these were showing up in the autopsies of the dead...As we used to be told in the tv show the X-files: The truth is out there. The truth despite conniving lying efforts on a global scale by big pharma, by governments, by complicit health professionals and complicit media working for years to persuade us otherwise, the truth is out there and for those responsible still in post richer by miles, untouched so far by any consequences whatsoever, surely there's a storm coming."
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:09:02 UTC No. 16259355
Sudden deaths don't seem to be slowing down
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:10:17 UTC No. 16259357
>>16251318
Jewish culture
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:12:20 UTC No. 16259359
>>16253879
An even smaller minority that seeks such content out to then whine about it seems. Absolute cuck behavior
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:15:52 UTC No. 16259363
>>16247761
I can choose to stop thinking about it, you can not choose to be unvaxxed.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 06:32:35 UTC No. 16259379
>>16259363
>I can choose to stop thinking about it
Why are you then still seething over things that happened 3 years ago?
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:28:08 UTC No. 16259512
Frontiers tier quackery. I'm surprised it's not all Mohammeds and Zhongs listed as the authors.
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 09:32:32 UTC No. 16259514
Poltards keep spamming this board with "science bad" and "scientist dumb", therefore this study is also bad and the authors dumb
Anonymous at Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:51:16 UTC No. 16259610
>>16259514
post nose
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 01:02:30 UTC No. 16260472
>>16259512
Racism is banned on 4chan outside of /b/
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 04:36:38 UTC No. 16260665
>>16246121
I'm not saying there isn't evidence of the vax causing negative things and not saying there won't be a lot more negative things coming from it but McCullough sells supplements and Makis is a "Nuclear Medicine Radiologist"
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:46:38 UTC No. 16260952
>>16259610
So which one is it? Is science fake and bad, or is science suddenly reliable when it aligns with your political views? Answer me.
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:01:35 UTC No. 16262016
>>16260665
>Nuclear Medicine Radiologist
AKA a cancer specialist
Anonymous at Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:05:18 UTC No. 16262020
>>16262016
Get insurance policies on your jabbinated loved ones before they start adjustment for black swan events.
Anonymous at Tue, 2 Jul 2024 07:02:57 UTC No. 16263963
>>16263288
damn i wish i'd gotten fired for refusing to take the vax.
Anonymous at Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:39:34 UTC No. 16266271
>>16265119
>THE SCIENCE HAS CHANGED
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 02:59:53 UTC No. 16267067
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:01:24 UTC No. 16267068
>>16248895
>>Sepsis (234 days after the vaccine)
On opponents of vaccines, he said: “ They are just completely and utterly barking mad; there are no two ways around it and they must be ignored. It must not detract from anyone going to get a vaccine, which is the road to recovery.”
https://archive.is/BzaQG
https://youtu.be/U6sWzoewefk?si=HdJ
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:02:56 UTC No. 16267073
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 03:09:09 UTC No. 16267080
>>16246121
After watching the lockstep lying of all doctors and scientists during covid, why would anyone give a shit what some study found about covid?
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:32:42 UTC No. 16267692
>>16253014
>cognitive dissonance
of only you knew how retarded you sound.
Anonymous at Thu, 4 Jul 2024 15:37:04 UTC No. 16267697
>>16260633
Daily reminder that spike proteins are in you forever, no matter the amount of cope.
Anonymous at Fri, 5 Jul 2024 05:21:02 UTC No. 16268534
>>16267080
how many boosters did you get?
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 03:24:12 UTC No. 16269910
>>16250496
>attacking the source because you can't refute it on a rational, scientific basis.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:11:08 UTC No. 16269942
BOOSTER SUPREMACY NOW
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vg4M
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:13:15 UTC No. 16269944
>>16251250
>impact factor is 1.8
lol, lmao even. I read somewhere an impact factor of 30 in medicine is equivalent to <5 in some other fields. this impact factor of 1.8 put this as trash of the trash.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 04:13:32 UTC No. 16269945
>>16246121
This study is specifically on deaths which is a small population of vaccinated. All vaccines carry a risk the same way all foods carry an anaphylaxis risk. Studies like this are to examine if the risk is higher than it should be, and any factors that could have contributed. Think of it this way, you wouldn't avoid eating something with egg in it if there was no personal risk. But if you had a family history of egg allergy you might avoid a potentially allergic food. And since studies have shown more people then average react to egg that is why it gets put on an allergy list and labeled in bold on packages food ingredients.
Anonymous at Sat, 6 Jul 2024 14:12:47 UTC No. 16270319
>>16248895
What? Conservatives lying and creating hoaxes to protect their feelings? That's never happened before.
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 04:08:05 UTC No. 16271059
>>16270319
you're obsessed with politics
>>>/pol/
Anonymous at Sun, 7 Jul 2024 04:27:32 UTC No. 16271075
>>16265119
From Mayo
>In June 2020, the FDA ended the emergency use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for treatment of COVID-19.
>Over time, clinical trials showed hydroxychloroquine:
>Led to serious heart problems in some people.
>Did not effectively treat COVID-19.
>Did not prevent infection with the virus that causes COVID-19.
References
>Terminated or revoked EUAs. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/emergency-prepa
>FDA cautions against use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19 outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial due to risk of heart rhythm problems, review of safety issues. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safe
>COVID-19 treatment guidelines. National Institutes of Health. https://www.covid19treatmentguideli