Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 20:59:01 UTC No. 16246221

Greta is based though. She BTFO Andrew Tate.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:01:49 UTC No. 16246227

>>16246173
That climate scientist MIGHT not have been wrong, the process is ongoing, and we MIGHT indeed get wiped.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:03:20 UTC No. 16246230

Greta is based since she switched to eliminating zionism.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:04:08 UTC No. 16246232

>>16246227
Your Mom MIGHT suck my duck. But the process is ongoing and I MIGHT bust my nut in her mouth shortly.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:04:47 UTC No. 16246233

We're fucked in 10 years

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 21:59:38 UTC No. 16246305

>>16246173
>humanity ends in 40,000 years
see, that top scientist was right!! why didn't we listen??

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 22:05:25 UTC No. 16246316

>>16246232
he's still right, you know

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:18:23 UTC No. 16246419

>>16246173
Alarmists do exist, and I disagree with them, but I do still think something is happening.
It's not "oh my god everything is going to go to shit" nuclear-holocaust 9001 levels of happening, but still best to start curving it a bit.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:32:55 UTC No. 16246440

>>16246173
She said the world is going to end if fossil fuel use isn't stopped in five years, not that the world is going to end in five years if fossil fuel use isn't stopped.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:47:28 UTC No. 16246451

>>16246419
How do you explain Mars having no measurable greenhouse effect despite having over 3000% more CO2 per unit surface area in it's atmosphere than Earth does?

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:52:40 UTC No. 16246461

>>16246221
LMAO

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:54:08 UTC No. 16246465

>>16246233

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Jun 2024 23:58:48 UTC No. 16246467

>>16246451
Doesn't it also have no magnetosphere?
I thought it was a pretty thin atmosphere compared to earth due to it being stripped by solar winds and such.
I know Wikipedia isn't the best source but being 2% as thick as earth's atmosphere would probably counteract most of the insulation effects.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:02:09 UTC No. 16246473

>>16246451
I looked it up, sources outside of wikipedia as well, and yeah, it's tons thinner than earth. 90%+ carbon on a 1-2% as thick atmosphere IS much higher than our 0.01% carbon on a 100% thickness (relative) atmosphere, but it's also not enough to insulate the planet.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:15:46 UTC No. 16246501

>>16246467
Since you seem to have some level of well studied expertise in this topic, explain how atmospheric density affects CO2's ability to function as a greenhouse gas. Any one outgoing wave of infrared radiation on Mars is more than 30 times more likely to encounter a CO2 molecule as one on Earth is, the fact that Mars doesn't have vast quantities of oxygen and nitrogen doesn't change that.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:18:41 UTC No. 16246509

>>16246501
The atmosphere itself is required to hold heat, it's the reason you don't burn in the daylight and freeze in the nighttime.
Having a much thinner atmosphere means less ability to hold heat in general, so yes the O2 and N2 do affect the temperature of the earth.
The fact other gasses also affect the temperature and we can (somewhat) control their output means that we can change the insulation of earth.
Again, I'm not an alarmist, like I said. I don't see a reason NOT to curve the usage, at the very least. Is there a particular reason not to use more nuclear, solar, or hydro power?
At worst, nothing changes. At best, things get a bit better.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 00:24:00 UTC No. 16246516

>>16246501
To continue on a bit
>Any one outgoing wave of infrared radiation on Mars is more than 30 times more likely to encounter a CO2 molecule as one on Earth is
Assume earth was 100% nitrogen and mars was 100% CO2, but earth still had 1atm and mars still had 0.02atm
Any one infrared photon would be 50x more likely to interact with a particle on earth than on mars, or put the other way, mars would be much more likely to get it and emit it without any trapping whatsoever.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:15:03 UTC No. 16247720

>>16246173