Image not available

1007x776

25IQ points on ev....jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16246474

IQ question.
Found this fascinating post that I think fits perfectly in this general. What do you think?
Are IQ points important in real life? Can differences in IQ break up families? I've never ever heard anyone irl bring up IQ points in a casual conversation.

Image not available

487x560

1714866972992220.gif

Anonymous No. 16246559

>reddit
>screencap
>thread

Anonymous No. 16246573

>>16246474
>in this general.
in this general what?

IQ has nothing to do with it retard this is a family feud not Jeopardy!

Anonymous No. 16246587

>>16246474
Everyone on my inmediate family has roughly the same IQ, my physicist dad married my mathematician mom and had me and my siblings
We brutally mog our extended family though

Anonymous No. 16246594

>>16246587
does you physicist dad have a high social IQ? can he find his socks or your mom needs to help him?

Anonymous No. 16246595

>>16246573
>in this general
oops meant to say /IQ general/ or just /sci/ I guess. iq is discussed here all the time.

Anonymous No. 16246596

>>16246594
They are both introverts :(

Anonymous No. 16246598

>>16246596
oh. i imagine you are not exactly an extravert either? but at least they found each other. i am curious how introverts even mate. maybe it was easier back then.

Anonymous No. 16246720

Theu should have lobotomized that Ivy tard and this would cure him of his overachievementardation

Anonymous No. 16246825

>>16246596
At least they had kids, and kids with someone roughly equally smart. One of my grandfathers got into MIT, the other, never went to uni, but came from a long line of pharmacists and smartest-guy-in-towns. Both of them chose do-nothing, stupid women. Then my dad picked my mom, whom could barely finish a biochem degree without assistance. I'm at best 125, severely psychiatrically afflicted (OCD/schizotypal, borderline or autistic mystery mix the docs can't figure out). My mom's brother is fluent in Chinese, Spanish, French and English. Travelled the world, encyclopedic knowledge of literature and theatre, absolute chad, although unfortunately, total fuck up relationship- and career-wise. The other siblings on both sides were unremarkable and did not reproduce. Point is, you can really fuck it up. Smart people don't have enough kids, including the faggot who wrote the screencapped post in OP and his cunt sister. Then you've got the secondary mistake of that sister, shaving points off her offspring's potential ability for nothing. There's no shortage of intelligent men, as a ratio to intelligent women.

Anonymous No. 16246831

>>16246474
First, IQ can only be compared between people who took the same test(s). Some IQ tests top-out at 130. And some prioritize different skills.
>Are IQ points important in real life?
No. I've maxed-out proctored IQ tests (generally 140), have 2 engineering degrees, but at age 35 have never had $2k at a time in my life. It measures something, but whether that equates to success in life... no, it doesn't.

Anonymous No. 16246835

>>16246825
By which I mean that there's no excuse for an intelligent woman to pick a stupid (<135) male. The gap in standard deviations of IQ by sex would have left her with a pool of men more than twice the size of that for women. That's assuming she herself was over 135. I've dated girls in the 135-145 range a few times. They are self-limiting as a phenomenon in the way that they forsake reproduction.

Anonymous No. 16246838

>>16246831
It does measure some sense of capacity for productivity, which is important for the advancement of the collective human organism. We'd stall without people that are innately drawn to problem-solving and analysis.

Anonymous No. 16246841

>>16246838
That's great, but if no one hires you because you're an autist who looks and acts half his age and you have no money it kinda doesn't matter.

Anonymous No. 16246845

>>16246825
>one of my grandfathers got into MIT
all due respect, before like y2k, MIT had like a 17%+ acceptance rate

Anonymous No. 16246875

>>16246845
Is that the average across all programs? I think it was for engineering, and he was awarded a scholarship. He was never tested as I'm aware of, but having spent time around a lot of 140's, I'd guess he was somewhere between 135 and 140. Of course, I only ever knew him as his sun was setting.

Anonymous No. 16246899

>>16246875
There's other stuff going on there too. The guy came from a very impoverished family and community. Lightning won't strike twice. There may have been the perfect storm in genotype that made him what he was. His brother was only a modestly successful programmer in Europe, every sister void and worthless. Regression to the ancestral pop's mean. I have a close friend like that, probably somewhere between me and 135 maximum. Parents? Both easily over 145. Two talented programmers with storied careers of meteoric rise, deeply impressive, perfect memory on all fronts (episodic, working, etc.) in both.

Anonymous No. 16246954

>>16246845
acceptance rate is also a factor of the amount of applications they get and the quality of the applications. if a greater number of dumber people apply despite not being qualified, it tanks the acceptance number despite the possibility that the chance of getting in as a remotely intelligent person is roughly the same.

Anonymous No. 16247342

>>16246474
fake as shit

Image not available

527x743

GP5HtPqWIAAyRua.jpg

Anonymous No. 16247588

>>16246474
IQ is fake and gay

Anonymous No. 16248061

>>16246845
Is MIT as woke as Harvard these days?

Anonymous No. 16248210

>>16246587
Interesting, only 3 males of my family generation are highly intelligent (130+), another is a homo and the women are average but introvertedly autistic.
We have no history of education or STEM exposure, yet the 3 of us are in engineering/CS, quite a way to go from coal miners in the previous generations.