Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 05:01:40 UTC No. 16246867
>>16246847
Yeah why not. I can make a device that that fires Röntgenstrahlen at you and fits on my head. It won't have the desired effect though as you need to actually CAPTURE them behind the object you're radiating ya nugget.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 05:11:58 UTC No. 16246891
>>16246847
give it a few years and we could have AR goggles powerful enough to run a real-time nudify app.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:25:02 UTC No. 16246987
>>16246891
DUDE YES
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:29:41 UTC No. 16246993
>>16246891
Surprisingly serious reply for such a silly thread.
To be really real time it would need an unreasonable power though some lag will be inevitable.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:27:31 UTC No. 16247052
>>16246891
>>16246987
Do you have a micropenis? Do you not have a Cowper's gland? That's the only way these glasses would work lmao.
Nude app glasses would be pointless for normal men since you'll have a noticable erection in public and would have visible "precum" leakage on your clothes. Reputation would be ruined even if people didn't think you were wearing some sort of pornographying device. You would also be sweating more and you couldn't focus on what you want to do. I always wanted the opposite. A pill that turns off sex drive completely. It is disgraceful to have an erection in public.
Also if you own expensive clothes like Kiton, SLP, Dior Homme, Brioni the leakage will stain and ruin articles costing more than most people make in a week. Sure was worth being distracted and ruining them to gawk at some whore.
If you're that desperate you're honestly better off using hard drugs instead. Social reputation can be maintained and nobody needs to know if you're on stimulants and opiates. These would also free the mind from being consumed by muh sex.
Basically every unsuccessful person I know in real life takes this "c'est la vie" attitude about sex which leads to weekly alcohol or weed use. They don't think it could be harmful because it's uhhhh natural. They masturbate as often as they get the chance because they don't see it as harmful. I can have sex with most women I want but I've learned it doesn't get me anywhere and indulging in idle fantasies about seeing them nude will do nothing to improve my life.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:23:27 UTC No. 16247099
Xray imaging is a complicated topic, the goggles you want would probably be extremely large and you'd need to wear a counterweight on the back of your head in order to avoid becoming unbalanced.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:55:54 UTC No. 16247136
>>16246867
>you need to actually CAPTURE them behind the object you're radiating ya nugget
not if you could have a portable backscatter capture device that would output the image directly onto your glasses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backs
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:11:00 UTC No. 16247156
>>16247052
besides creating social taboos against erections and precumming in public, there's nothing we would be able to do to stop a technology like that. women would have to adapt by wearing large voluminous robes, camouflaged in a way to break up outlines and confuse nudify algorithms. inconvenient, but that's the price for banning stay-at-home sexbots.
Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 21:49:24 UTC No. 16248234
Aren’t X-rays ionizing radiation? Where are you going to get the X-rays? I would expect more success from radiowave glasses.