Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:27:05 UTC No. 16247259

>>16247033
They're as good as dead.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:50:38 UTC No. 16247481

>>16247033
>coping
A bit, but from what I understand the systems that failed would not survive reentry, so they're staying put up there to study everything while they can. It makes sense if true.
Also, don't fly in the 787, don't fly in the 737 max.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:21:59 UTC No. 16247740

>>16247481
Didn't Starliner have issues separating the service module in previous test flights? That could cause LOCV.

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:46:32 UTC No. 16247784

>>16247740
both of the previous uncrewed test flights were failures, this is the 3rd test flight, also a failure.
why did they launch with a crew before having a successful test flight?

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:48:47 UTC No. 16247798

>>16247784
PR pressure

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:57:32 UTC No. 16247819

>>16247033
Who is this "diverysity" hire?

Anonymous at Sat, 22 Jun 2024 18:18:27 UTC No. 16247865

it's technically not possible to be "stranded" on the ISS, any moreso than the regular crew are. this is damage control PR speak.

>>16247259
absolute worst case scenario you just detach and deorbit the Starliner module and send another reentry capsule, likely a Soyuz, up there to bring them back down.